Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
A Progressive Idiocracy Favorite....No Witnesses
A Progressive Idiocracy Favorite....No Witnesses
By nefarious101
31 Aug 2022 5:18 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
6 Sep 2022 1:03 pm
Nonsense edited out for Post Count.Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑It doesn't demand one.
The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY developed to launch a modified .22 caliber round at 3X its "civilian speed".
A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.
But for its use in an Assault Weapon, it was increased by a factor of 3.
Again,, no existing civilian market for the system.
Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22. Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290. A civilian rifle.The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY developed to launch a modified .22 caliber round at 3X its "civilian speed".
But for its use in an Assault Weapon, it was increased by a factor of 3.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248
This is the link to my previous posted.
viewtopic.php?p=2119234#p2119234
Explain the 270 Winchester. Or even this from 1912.A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.
The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.
You should have read the link. You would have learned something. It contains a great history of "high velocity" rounds and firearms.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Sep 2022 1:05 pm
@Blackvegetable
As I said your report is not relevant. Your comments on what was sufficient for the civilian market were uninformed. You are in way over your head.
As I said your report is not relevant. Your comments on what was sufficient for the civilian market were uninformed. You are in way over your head.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Sep 2022 1:07 pm
Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑Oh, it's coming.Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2022, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑This is an argument, not an exercise in Narrative.Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Sorry, I don't see a detailed narrative. You have failed to explain the relevance of a 1957 report on a weapon that the US military did not buy and how it applies to the modern sports rifles sold today.
Epic fail Didn't think you could do it. That's why you pussied of the conditions. No problem though. You report has absolutely no relevance to the above.
Nod.
Nod.
I just destroyed your argument as a man would!
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Sep 2022 1:09 pm
From the guy who believes me sucking dicks would be heterosexual activity between me and a woman. ^
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:10 pm
No...but I bet you did, bitch...Cannonpointer » 06 Sep 2022, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑ From the guy who believes me sucking dicks would be heterosexual activity between me and a woman. ^
6 Sep 2022 1:12 pm
You don't understand Argument.Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Nonsense edited out for Post Count.
Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22. Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290. A civilian rifle.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248
This is the link to my previous posted.
viewtopic.php?p=2119234#p2119234
Explain the 270 Winchester. Or even this from 1912.
The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.
You should have read the link. You would have learned something. It contains a great history of "high velocity" rounds and firearms.
Enough, you **** brick..Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22
6 Sep 2022 1:16 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:17 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:17 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:18 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:18 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:19 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:20 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:20 pm
No questions, dick sucker.
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
6 Sep 2022 1:20 pm
It's gas..
Light a match.
6 Sep 2022 1:26 pm
Only if you ignore the citations in favor of the yap yap.
I never do.
6 Sep 2022 1:30 pm
What does any of this have to do with the AR-15?Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Nonsense edited out for Post Count.
Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22. Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290. A civilian rifle.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248
This is the link to my previous posted.
viewtopic.php?p=2119234#p2119234
Explain the 270 Winchester. Or even this from 1912.
The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.
You should have read the link. You would have learned something. It contains a great history of "high velocity" rounds and firearms.
6 Sep 2022 1:30 pm
Be sure to stick around.
6 Sep 2022 1:34 pm
Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑You don't understand Argument.Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Nonsense edited out for Post Count.
Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22. Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290. A civilian rifle.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248
Enough, you **** brick..Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22
A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.
or:The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.
Huh, a .22 firing at 3700 FPS designed in the 30s. Who deemed 1100 a muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes?The next major leap in velocity came with the introduction of a wildcat cartridge by gunsmith Jerry Gebby during the 1930s. Gebby called it the .22 Varminter and got the idea for necking down the .250 Savage case for 0.224-inch bullets and changing its shoulder angle to 28 degrees from rifle and cartridge designer Charles Newton. Velocity with a 55-grain bullet was around 3,700 fps.
You should have read the link I provided. What else ya got? This is fun and your argument is ignorant. Sit down, shut the **** up, and don't challenge me on this again.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
6 Sep 2022 1:41 pm
Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2022, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑What does any of this have to do with the AR-15?Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Nonsense edited out for Post Count.
Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22. But it wasn't a .22. Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290. A civilian rifle.
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248
This is the link to my previous posted.
viewtopic.php?p=2119234#p2119234
Explain the 270 Winchester. Or even this from 1912.
The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.
You should have read the link. You would have learned something. It contains a great history of "high velocity" rounds and firearms.
Your muzzle velocity argument is toast.
Your words:
THAT is what this has to do with the ARmalite Rifle 15. Your own words.The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY developed to launch a modified .22 caliber round at 3X its "civilian speed".
But for its use in an Assault Weapon, it was increased by a factor of 3.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Who is online
In total there are 3940 users online :: 10 registered, 14 bots, and 3916 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, RebelGator, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101
Bots: Firefox/7.0, Not, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, Bolt, YandexBot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, bingbot, Applebot