Liberal Forum

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:22 am

Still waiting.  Enough of your diversions.

Bring it on.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:24 am

Define what you insist you haven't seen.

If you don't want to do so, then acknowledge the fact in the citation, and brace yourself for the Mother of All Taint Punts.

Your choice.

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:31 am

still nothing.  I want to see you kick my ***.

Git ‘er done

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:41 am

I've already done so...but, because you demand I show you something you can't define, you leave me no option other than defining it for both of us.

If you persist, you will have to accept my definition.

Agreed?

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:43 am

You have cut and pasted and made demands.  No point.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:45 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:43 am

You have cut and pasted and made demands.  No point.

 

 

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:58 am

Still nothing but talk.  Just tell me how your citation kicks my ***.  Or at least what it means.  All your talk of definitions and stipulations shows you have no clue what your are talking about.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:06 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 8:58 am

Still nothing but talk.  Just tell me how your citation kicks my ***.  Or at least what it means.  All your talk of definitions and stipulations shows you have no clue what your are talking about.

 

 

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:07 am

You are still diverting.  I am waiting to see you kick my ***.  Bring it on.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:11 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:07 am

You are still diverting.  I am waiting to see you kick my ***.  Bring it on.

 

 

If you don't want to do so, then acknowledge the fact in the citation, and brace yourself for the Mother of All Taint Punts.

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:13 am

And still nothing.  

Just do it.  Stop diverting and running.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:24 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:13 am

And still nothing.  

Just do it.  Stop diverting and running.

 

 

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:32 am

Again, explain how your citation will give me for the Mother of All Taint Punts.  A really simple task that even you should understand.  

Until you do all you have done is cut and paste.

Ball is in your court, Control Freak.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:48 am

.

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:56 am

All that is needed is an explanation as to how your pertains to the discussion and how it kicks my ***.

so far you are losing

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 10:15 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 9:56 am

All that is needed is an explanation as to how your pertains to the discussion and how it kicks my ***.

so far you are losing

No....

I don't need to tell you how I will punt your taint....the board of ethicists I consulted on the matter say I only bear a moral obligation to inform you that I shall do so with Vigor.

Consider yourself so informed.
 

 

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 11:24 am

*******,  Again, I am waiting you to do it.

1...2...3....Go....Start punting....

Good God, more action, less talk.

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 7:02 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 6:50 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 6:50 am

Fourth time:

You first have to explain, in your own words, what that citation means, I am not obligated to acknowledge anthing.  You must show YOU understand the citation. 

As noted before the velocity of the .22 ranged from that as a low upwards of 3000 FPS.

You complain about acknowledging citations.

now get on with it..

you've got another taint punt coming.

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Sep 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 11:53 am

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 11:24 am

*******,  Again, I am waiting you to do it.

1...2...3....Go....Start punting....

Good God, more action, less talk.

Tiny,

You are sitting in the satellite parking lot demanding to be entertained.

If you will either stipulate to facts, define "argument", or acknowledge a definition of "argument" provided, I will proceed to use Argument to taint punt you into the sun.

Now you have been told how.

Your failure to act is an admission that you can take no more curb.


 

 

Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 1:03 pm

Blackvegetable » 06 Sep 2022, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 12:31 pm

Huey » 06 Sep 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 12:23 pm

 

The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY developed to launch a modified .22 caliber round at 3X its "civilian speed".

A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.

But for its use in an Assault Weapon, it was increased by a factor of 3.

Nonsense edited out for Post Count.  

The AR-15 was SPECIFICALLY developed to launch a modified .22 caliber round at 3X its "civilian speed".

But for its use in an Assault Weapon, it was increased by a factor of 3.

Yes, the Armalite Rifle 15 was designed to fire at 3x the speed of a .22.  But it wasn't a .22.  Also, the fastest, as I have already posted for you was  the 270 Winchester was the high velocity “champ” at 3290.  A civilian rifle.  
https://www.rifleshootermag.com/editori ... eed/392248

This is the link to my previous posted.  

viewtopic.php?p=2119234#p2119234

A muzzle velocity long held sufficient for civilian purposes.

Explain the 270 Winchester. Or even this from 1912.

 

The .22 Savage High-Power loaded with a 70-grain bullet at 2,750 fps was introduced in the Savage 99 in 1912. Three years later, Savage introduced the .250-3000 Savage in its Model 99 and Model 1920 rifles; an 87-grain bullet at 3,000 fps made it the fastest sporting cartridge of American design to reach that velocity level.

You should have read the link.  It contains a great history of "high velocity" rounds and firearms.

Huey » 07 Sep 2022, 12:15 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 12:15 pm

This is how a man does it.  Notice I did not make demands.  I just did it. 

@Blackvegetable