Liberal Forum

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Twm7W926JWg
 

The FBI scored big!

#1 A bunch of empty folders.

#2 Melania's panties.

This time for sure.         
 
 

You can buy top secret folders all over the internet. Shhh...don't tell anybody.

roadkill » 03 Sep 2022, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 9:21 am

The FBI scored big!

#1 A bunch of empty folders.

#2 Melania's panties.

This time for sure.       

Road,

There is a complete inventory list available. 

You're a moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:44 am

Road,

There is a complete inventory list available. 

You're a moron.

There is an inventory list of how many folders/cover sheets were discovered.

They have yet to say what was on them AND if they were really classified.

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:50 am

There is an inventory list of how many folders/cover sheets were discovered.

They have yet to say what was on them AND if they were really classified.

False.
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am

False.

Then A real man would post what this list of documents contains and make his point and do a victory dance.

It you didn’t because you are running from your epic beat down this morning.  I bumped it for you,  

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:55 am

Then A real man would post what this list of documents contains and make his point and do a victory dance.

It you didn’t because you are running from your epic beat down this morning.  I bumped it for you,

No need.

It you didn’t because you are running from your epic beat down this morning.  I bumped it for you,

You couldn't find your balks.

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:56 am

No need.

You couldn't find your balks.

No need because it does not exist.

I am still waiting for you to make your point.

Manafort-the man who lied to the FBI.

Hahahahahahahahahaha

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:57 am

No need because it does not exist.

I am still waiting for you to make your point.

I show you, and you take a year off.

I am still waiting for you to make your point.

we are waiting for you to answer, truthfully.

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am

False.

My words:

There is an inventory list of how many folders/cover sheets were discovered.

They have yet to say what was on them AND if they were really classified.

Here is a link to the complete inventory.  It doesn’t say what is contained in the documents/folders or if they are really classified.

You May shut up know.

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:59 am

I show you, and you take a year off.

we are waiting for you to answer, truthfully.

I just posted the inventory list.
 

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:03 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:52 am

False.

My words:

There is an inventory list of how many folders/cover sheets were discovered.

They have yet to say what was on them AND if they were really classified.

Here is a link to the complete inventory.  It doesn’t say what is contained in the documents/folders or if they are really classified.

You May shut up know.

 

 

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:03 am

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 10:59 am

I show you, and you take a year off.

we are waiting for you to answer, truthfully.

I just posted the inventory list.
 

 

You're a **** idiot.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:06 am

You're a **** idiot.

Yes, you are.  

Now, if you want to challenge you got to do something first.  Clearly state that you are going to show me an inventory list that contains the following:

1.  A list of what was actually going in the folders and what the paperwork was about.

2.  A list of what the documents with/without cover sheets were about.

Then I will consider the challenge and your repercussions when you lose.

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:09 am

Yes, you are.  

Now, if you want to challenge you got to do something first.  Clearly state that you are going to show me an inventory list that contains the following:

1.  A list of what was actually going in the folders and what the paperwork was about.

2.  A list of what the documents with/without cover sheets were about.

Then I will consider the challenge and your repercussions when you lose.

No..

Just stipulate to the facts.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:10 am

No..

Just stipulate to the facts.

ok, you were bluffing on the challenge.  

The inventory that I posted a link to answers none of those questions.  Now you turning into pretzel trying to figure out how to get out of looking so STOOPID.

Now, I will stipulate to any facts you actually post to and are linked to credible sources.  I will not answer questions or demands where I am doing your work for you.

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:14 am

ok, you were bluffing on the challenge.  

The inventory that I posted a link to answers none of those questions.  Now you turning into pretzel trying to figure out how to get out of looking so STOOPID.

Now, I will stipulate to any facts you actually post to and are linked to credible sources.  I will not answer questions or demands where I am doing your work for you.

Funny..

You can't type a dozen words from a title, or stipulate to facts....because iPad..

But you can type paragraphs of blather.


 

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:17 am

Funny..

You can't type a dozen words from a title, or stipulate to facts....because iPad..

But you can type paragraphs of blather.

Still no facts.  Keep spinning.  Accept your defeat.

Go see what is on the other thread.

Huey » 03 Sep 2022, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2022, 11:18 am

Still no facts.  Keep spinning.  Accept your defeat.

Go see what is on the other thread.

Separately from the more than 100 documents with classified marking seized by DOJ in their search, the property inventory also reveals that agents gathered more than 11,000 documents or photographs without classification markings, all described as property of the U.S. government


https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/judge-u ... d=89220999

admit you're a loser..
Again