Scottmon doesn’t believe youXavier_Onassis » 06 Sep 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ That is seriously wrong. Every US president up to Truman was a mason, and the Masonic Orders are still in existence.
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Sep 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ That is seriously wrong. Every US president up to Truman was a mason, and the Masonic Orders are still in existence.
1) no they arent. Find me any hitler speech on yourtube.ScottMon » 06 Sep 2022, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ They're on Youtube and transcribed. And yes, Jews have a major reason for hating Jews and the 3rd Reich. Hitler rose to power by blaming them.
I am telling the truth and you can easily determine this.FOS » 06 Sep 2022, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ hilarious. 1) you failed to detect my sarcasm.. 2) not even close to EVERY president lol
ScottMon » 05 Sep 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Pretty sure Hitler brought all that **** on himself. He and his cohorts had easy pickins when he played on the sympathy of the downtrodden Germans.
Xavier_Onassis » 06 Sep 2022, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑ I am telling the truth and you can easily determine this.
You are no good at sarcasm. I see no need for detecting it in any case.
Yes, I also mentioned this subject years ago...and how saturated everything has become which is why we have a bunch of paper pushing jobs (meaningless corporate/white-collar work) with glorious titles bestowed upon 110-120 midwits on LinkedIn such that they can brag about "how intelligent" they areSJConspirator » 04 Sep 2022, 1:22 am » wrote: ↑ Automation displaces workers (bank tellers, cashiers, factory workers, assembly lines etc.) while simultaneously increasing production tenfold. This results in massive surplus of every commodity, while decreasing the number of wage earners who can afford to buy them.
That is the paradox of abundance, the “crisis of capitalism” and it all but guarantees there will be some sort of UBI eventually
https://www.colombotelegraph.com/index. ... -headache/
Super duper old world political theory's with the same old world monarchy feudal-tribal war results. The Germans made the mistake of discontinuing their constitution and joining a gang for the said-claimed purpose of fighting off a gang. The solution was respect for all the constitutional rules and individual protections without allowing various corporation communes to ignore all the laws and abuse individual citizens.LibDave » 03 Sep 2022, 11:47 pm » wrote: ↑ I've just a few comments on your posts.
1st: A minor suggestion. Many of your target audience do not fully understand key terms in your subject. I hate that this is the case, but something we have to live with due to the constant attempts by various interests to obfuscate what they profess. I find it consistently confusing to readers when addressing the subject of Capitalism, Socialism, Communism and Fascism. I know it's rough but foresight can stave off much of the misunderstanding.
Marxism is socialism. Marxist-Leninism is a bastardization\augmentation of socialism called communism. You referred to Nazism as socialist. Hitler and the Nazi's were not socialists, they were a bastardization\augmentation of socialism called National Socialism or Fascism. In many ways augmentations from socialism for Communism and Fascism are opposites. Which is why the Nazi's battled in the streets with the Communists. See how confusing it can be. It helps to use consistent terms such as the following:
Hitler didn't hate Jews any more than he hated anybody else in Germany. Those he hated more than any others were those who tried to keep him from power. Hitler saw Mussolini use communists as scapegoats in his rise to power. Hitler found Jews as even more convenient scapegoats than communists (although he used both), but the nazi persecution of Jews (who Hitler blamed for the severe treatment Germany received after WWI), was all about working the German people into an anti-Semitic rage that would carry him into control of the country. He was good at this.LowIQTrash » 10 Jan 2023, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, I also mentioned this subject years ago...and how saturated everything has become which is why we have a bunch of paper pushing jobs (meaningless corporate/white-collar work) with glorious titles bestowed upon 110-120 midwits on LinkedIn such that they can brag about "how intelligent" they are
Economics Compacted, by Fred Reed - The Unz Review
"It all but guarantees there will be some sort of UBI" - I think (((they))) would rather get rid of the "useless eaters"...just a hunch.
I can't prove it but we'll see how this plays out. And even IF we get some kind of UBI it will be a complete joke...rent for a single bedroom apartment right now in my medium COL city is like $1500/month, yet Trump during the Covid-19 scamdemic paid like what? $1200 for just a couple months per adult + $500/child?
Freemasons existed during the building of Solomon's Temple in the Torah/Old Testament of Christian Bible. Freemasons were Pagans before Christianity started and they built the Cathedrals of every religion known to mankind.Xavier_Onassis » 06 Sep 2022, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑ That is seriously wrong. Every US president up to Truman was a mason, and the Masonic Orders are still in existence.
And did he require her in the future to pay for her rent and meals? Your analogy fails.LibDave » 04 Sep 2022, 12:20 am » wrote: ↑ Very much agree. I was surprised to find out my girlfriends children were not taught anything about socialism in school (though they had been convinced it was the bee's knees). In order to teach them about socialism I offered to pay 20$ to clean the living room. My 10 year old daughter volunteered vigorously. She cleaned it meticulously and came for her pay. I paid her 4$ and each of her 4 siblings 4$. When she objected, declaring she did the work alone without their input I explained we are going to operate under a socialist system. It does not matter who does the work, everyone gets equal pay. As the tears welled up in her eyes I told her, well tomorrow I will pay 20$ to have the bathrooms cleaned. So if one of your siblings cleans the bathrooms you will get another 4$. So if they all apply themselves as you have you will benefit. "Who wants to clean the bathroom tomorrow?" Crickets! I of course then paid her the 20$. But they never forgot what socialism is and why it doesn't work. I explained to her, you think socialism is bad when you're dealing with just the size of your family? Imagine how little you would have gotten if I split it just among the 200 people in the neighborhood. Any attempt to increase your earnings would have netted you 10 cents. And what about at the municipal or national level. Under socialism there is no hope. Nothing but despair. No amount of effort on your part to improve your lot in life results in more than a 1000th of a penny's worth of reward. It definitely does fail with scale very quickly.
The bigger the safety net, the more likely the "Government" will cull those who are adverse or do not contribute = regressive evolution.slideman » 11 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ And did he require her in the future to pay for her rent and meals? Your analogy fails.
The industrialized nations have demonstrated that a mixed economy of capitalism with a strong social safety net can succeed.
So what?
Skans is probably entirely okay with Herr Adolf's plan to euthanize all disabled people, all people incapable of supporting themselves as "useless eaters".Skans » 11 Jan 2023, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ The bigger the safety net, the more likely the "Government" will cull those who are adverse or do not contribute = regressive evolution.
No safety net - the best succeed; those less than mediocre die off = positive evolution
There was no plan to do that. Geez, are you people totally lacking in critical thinking.Xavier_Onassis » 11 Jan 2023, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Skans is probably entirely okay with Herr Adolf's plan to euthanize all disabled people, all people incapable of supporting themselves as "useless eaters".
slideman » 11 Jan 2023, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑ And did he require her in the future to pay for her rent and meals? Your analogy fails.
The industrialized nations have demonstrated that a mixed economy of capitalism with a strong social safety net can succeed.
My philosophy is more Darwinian and Galtonian than Hitlerian. Hitler arbitrarily, and with little to no real information or even education, attempted to engage in eugenics. Basically, Hitler's debacle was a bad clown show.Xavier_Onassis » 11 Jan 2023, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Skans is probably entirely okay with Herr Adolf's plan to euthanize all disabled people, all people incapable of supporting themselves as "useless eaters".
Perhaps all gays, Lesbians, barren women and women who refuse to bear children, as they do not comply with what is the obvious evolutionary solution.
No, he didn't.Skans » 11 Jan 2023, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑. Hitler arbitrarily, and with little to no real information or even education, attempted to engage in eugenics.
Yes he did. He tried to create a pure Aryan race, breeding blond, blue-eyed young Germans, thinking this would be the height of evolution. He also tried to get rid of what he termed "undesireables" from Germany. He thought he was enabling the German people to a new height in evolution. This is "clown-science". The guy was a clown. He really was. He had no concept of genetics, yet the science of genetics predated Hitler's rise to power. Hitler had no real knowledge of the sciences, and didn't have a clue what advancements in genetics had been made while he was fighting in WWI or after. Hitler was a great motivational speaker.