I guess the special master the court just approved will decide that.Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Of course..
If they actually WERE classified, they'd be labeled "Not Blue"...
They found over 100 with classified markings. We don’t know what the subject of each one is or if they are still classified.Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2022, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ They found over 100 of them upon their recent visit.
Why would they not still be classified, if so marked?Huey » 05 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ They found over 100 with classified markings. We don’t know what the subject of each one is or if they are still classified.
I know you find English confusing.
That's not the Special Master's job.Cedar » 05 Sep 2022, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ I guess the special master the court just approved will decide that.
Huey » 05 Sep 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑ They found over 100 with classified markings. We don’t know what the subject of each one is or if they are still classified.
I know you find English confusing.
fredo, please..I know you find English confusing.
DOJ is about to lose all of their “evidence.”
Because Trump had the power declassify them even if so marked by just declaring them unclassified.Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2022, 12:23 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would they not still be classified, if so marked?
It’s all beginning to slip through your fingers, better luck next time.
Cedar » 05 Sep 2022, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Because Trump had the power declassify them even if so marked by just declaring them unclassified.
Sure, Hazel..Cedar » 05 Sep 2022, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ It’s all beginning to slip through your fingers, better luck next time.
**chuckle**
:rofl:
Oh, yea..
You still upset that you’re white knuckling the Bishop to an unknown stranger?
Cedar » 05 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ You still upset that you’re white knuckling the Bishop to an unknown stranger?
**chuckle**
Huey+26 minutes ago
Does the copyright name the subject, groomer?Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ It's a copyrighted image.
It doesn't care about your anxieties.
Independent » 05 Sep 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ These document are so classified they use invisible ink and invisible paper!!!
Thats why they haven’t found them!!
Given that the two OFFICIAL documents provided, including his 2012 driver's license, confirm that his eyes are blue, the only question remaining is "how blue?"Cedar » 05 Sep 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Does the copyright name the subject, groomer?
You’re the one that keeps referencing the debate, the anxiety is yours.
You really are pretty thick...Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ I couldn't find the notquestion in your post....again.