Liberal Forum

B.See » 06 Sep 2022, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 9:42 pm

You can't possibly be arguing that systemic racism doesn't exist because there are no "laws of the books" (you say) that penalizes one for their race, are you???  How **** RIDICULOUS.

LMFAO.    

So there are no racist laws, we have to believe systemic racism exists without codification? Sorry but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Blacks committ a disproportionate amount of violent crime, crimes not easily  subject to confirmation bias. Why?  
 

Neo » 06 Sep 2022, 9:47 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 9:47 pm

So there are no racist laws, we have to believe systemic racism exists without codification? Sorry but extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Blacks committ a disproportionate amount of violent crime, crimes not easily  subject to confirmation bias. Why?

There's nothing "extraordinary" about the FACTS (not "claim") nor the EVIDENCE, excepting perhaps that there's an ABUNDANCE of the LATTER. 

Funny though how deniers of systemic racism are quick to deny its existence as a CONTRIBUTING FACTOR while they in turn try to make Black people out to be inherently VIOLENT. 

And judging by the hate speech YOU'VE been party to herein, one doesn't exactly have to be a rocket scientist to connect the DOTS....  Y'know???

So I'm done wasting my time with you too.

...all this f@cking republicrat-level bullsh!t about 'grooming in government schools,' etc. phony issue$ ad nauseam, is rendered moot if/when the/you f@cking fool authoritardian groomers learn about the blessings of free/fair/egalitarian enterprise...   

..of course the no.1 problem here is, again, (((((((THE MONEY))))))... so, again, republicrat dum-dum$ will be of zero/negative help...   

Neo » 06 Sep 2022, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Sep 2022, 9:39 pm

Name one law on the books that penalizes one for their race, just one example? Whites are not victims. Blacks are but it's not racism holding them back. It's well intentioned rape of the black family perpetuated by progressives. 
 

Embezzlement of each person's biological time to be forced by law to perform as typecast in anti discrimination orders. Reverse psychological class warfare to create topics of divide within one species that are always perpetual conflicts of interpretation every generation the issues are handed down ancestrally forward here.

ScottMon » 05 Sep 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

05 Sep 2022, 11:27 am

https://ffrf.org/news/news-releases/ite ... f-exclaims

Yes, the kids volunteered to be baptised but still, being baptised on a school ground is grooming.

That's not a Baptism, it's just an ice bath for athletes. If you've ever been in an ice bath, you'd pray too.
 

"Suffer the little children to come unto me", said Jesus.
How is that not 'grooming'?

Xavier_Onassis » 07 Sep 2022, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 11:20 am

"Suffer the little children to come unto me", said Jesus.
How is that not 'grooming'?

got to save ancestrally chosen realities humanity has become all or nothing eternal hell or high water isn't grooming every next generation arriving here one at a time replacing the 4 previous generations every great great grandchild added.

Feb. 1967 Star Trek aired an episode that originated the Khan character where I first heard "Better to rule in hell than serve in heaven.". I was 16 and instantly comprehended the meaning of that but everyone I knew rather believe time changes everything than accept everything is only changing now.

clevelandsteamer » 07 Sep 2022, 4:47 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Sep 2022, 4:47 pm

Jesus didn't groom them into homosexuals

I do not think there is evidence that he actually groomed them at all.
He was speaking to his disciples about what THEY should do.

You are aware that (1) Jesus was not married (2) people addressed him as Rabbi, and (3) Rabbis generally set a good example about proper behavior by getting married in their 20's.

 

clevelandsteamer » 08 Sep 2022, 4:16 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2022, 4:16 pm

Below is your original question. If you don't think he actually groomed them at all, why did you ask the question? You are in no position to teach me Biblical History.
At this time I am going to say you are a few sandwiches short of a picnic.

Well, what Jesus wanted his disciples to do was to groom little children into proper Jews.
Jesus never claimed that he wanted to start a new and/or different church.
Paul did that.

Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Sep 2022, 4:30 pm

Well, what Jesus wanted his disciples to do was to groom little children into proper Jews.
Jesus never claimed that he wanted to start a new and/or different church.
Paul did that.

Jesus didn't write anything, he was instinctively navigating life understanding the actions of biological results in plain sight never staying same details again.

He was leading people back to using their own brain occupying space here. He was describing life that doesn't fit contextual promises of better tomorrows, he was describing life in real time.

why the disciples manifested Christianity over paganism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, I Ching, or any other religion of the time. Jesus was resurrecting instinctive awareness within blind faith communities worshiping tomorrow's possibilities into fruition of traditional behavior currently taking place re-interpreted every generated lifetime added creating eternal conflicting information between siblings each generation using emotions against actual displacement, self loathing, everyone is born a sinner and must spend their time being alive honoring contextual codes of ethical behavior cradle to grave.

i.e. rule of law be it by God, country, community, generations present.