Hitler absolutely wanted all of Poland and all of Europe under his rule. The only peaceful land he annexed was Austria. All other lands were taken by force, and not just because he was concerned for the German citizens of Danzig. Saying it again and again, will not make such a silly and easily controverted position true.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ he did not want all of poland. that contradicts national socialism. his political model requires ethnic homogeneity...having a bunch of poles around would ruin germany. what conquests the nazis did was out of necessity because they were at war. poland wanted war, the nazis had to force capitulation. The ussr also invaded poland at the same time...and hitler obviously had to maintain control over territory that divided the ussr from germany. its quite simple.
you are just wrong. czechia also joined peacefully.Skans » 08 Sep 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Hitler absolutely wanted all of Poland and all of Europe under his rule. The only peaceful land he annexed was Austria. All other lands were taken by force, and not just because he was concerned for the German citizens of Danzig. Saying it again and again, will not make such a silly and easily controverted position true.
Dude....Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Poor. poor Adolf Hitler. He was a sad victim of circumstances. He was forced to invade all of Europe by France and the UK.
Just like Trump, no one has ever mistreated anyone as much as poor poor Trump/ Except Hitler. They drive the poor schmuck to suicide, they did.

when those of your collective we change their mind, how will you survive being "I". I am the eye of a perfect intellectual storm that was always on every event horizon of tomorrow already arrived today.Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Poor. poor Adolf Hitler. He was a sad victim of circumstances. He was forced to invade all of Europe by France and the UK.
Just like Trump, no one has ever mistreated anyone as much as poor poor Trump/ Except Hitler. They drive the poor schmuck to suicide, they did.
And the ussr...correct. I don't see what is implausible about that. What was the ussr doing as Germany annexed Austria and czechia? They annexed Estonia, Lithuania, and latvia...then they invaded Finland.Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Poor. poor Adolf Hitler. He was a sad victim of circumstances. He was forced to invade all of Europe by France and the UK.
Just like Trump, no one has ever mistreated anyone as much as poor poor Trump/ Except Hitler. They drive the poor schmuck to suicide, they did.
Yeah WWII was a serious victory for Hitler and the Germans.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ And the ussr...correct. I don't see what is implausible about that. What was the ussr doing as Germany annexed Austria and czechia? They annexed Estonia, Lithuania, and latvia...then they invaded Finland.
The invasion of Finland was very politically risky for Stalin and I can assure you that hitler hoped very much that it would provoke the western powers against stalin...and it almost did.. but clearly Churchill and fdr had too much personal love for Stalin. Oh well.
of course you know nothing of war...but the fact is that there is no way to win a war of attrition against a far greater empire.. the smaller country must become active.
.
really the only thing you should find mysterious is why france and uk decided to declare war instead of becoming allies. War was a very stupid decision for then. Certainly did not turn out well for them.
Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah WWII was a serious victory for Hitler and the Germans.
It was a pity that the Soviets drove poor Adolph to blow his brains out.
The Soviets were no threat to the UK or the US. Nazi Germany WAS a threat, economically as well as politically. Stalin was simply a potential ally of the UK and the US. The enemy of an enemy is at least a potential friend.
The War could not have been won without the Soviets, most experts say.
Could the Allies Have Won the War Without the Soviet Union? – James Holland's Griffon MerlinThe War could not have been won without the Soviets, most experts say...
Lol dude...come on...we have Stalin classified records since 1996. He was planning to conquer all of Europe and the usa. He was very happy that Germany and the uk were fighting eachother. He considered both of them an enemy.Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 11:46 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah WWII was a serious victory for Hitler and the Germans.
It was a pity that the Soviets drove poor Adolph to blow his brains out.
The Soviets were no threat to the UK or the US. Nazi Germany WAS a threat, economically as well as politically. Stalin was simply a potential ally of the UK and the US. The enemy of an enemy is at least a potential friend.
The War could not have been won without the Soviets, most experts say.
You are the sorry clown that knows nothing.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Lol dude...come on...we have Stalin classified records since 1996. He was planning to conquer all of Europe and the usa. He was very happy that Germany and the uk were fighting eachother. He considered both of them an enemy.
You literally just make **** up that you know nothing about. You have clearly read absolutely nothing about this...right? So why are you talking?
Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You are the sorry clown that knows nothing.
Germany was a bigger threat to the USSR than the UK or the US, it was right on the border of c0untry that the Nazis had invaded.
What Stalin wanted and what Stalin could get were quite different. I am sure that Churchill and FDR and later Truman were well aware of Stalin;s plans as well as his abilities.
It means it Carrie’s ground artillery and vehicles, not planes, nitwit Nazi.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ what the **** do you think that means? yes...they are used to assist in amphibious invasions lol...which normandy was
suck a dick, you Rohm wannabe.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ excuse me?...it was an aircraft carrier...you are just lying lol
um **** lol. It carries planes.Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 12:42 pm » wrote: ↑ It means it Carrie’s ground artillery and vehicles, not planes, nitwit Nazi.
145IQ. Was it one of those IQ tests on FB? You kkk no iq those are not rea, right dummy?
Poor Adolph, misunderstood schmuck. Nobody has ever been treated so badly by the rest of the world as Adolph. Not even Donald...but cIose, eh?FOS » 07 Sep 2022, 6:22 pm » wrote: ↑ lol he could have eventually? That's supposed to be an argument?
the fact is he didnt...and you have no reason to presume he ever would have.
The uk declared war on Germany...not the reverse. And I don't believe Germany could ever manage a land invasion of the uk without aircraft carriers and a bunch of u boats. Hitler did begin making u boats AFTER the uk declared war but he rejected a plan to convert a cruise ship into an aircraft carrier.
and why did Hitler choose not to wipe out the entire British army at Dunkirk? Why did Hitler approach Churchill with constant peace proposals?
the answer is obvious. Hr felt the uk was making a mistake fighting him. He believed the uk would be better served as his ally fighting to global threat of communism.
but that's the think. Western 'leaders' behaved like complete idiots throughout ww2..perhaps because they were idiots...perhaps because they were paid to
suck a dick, stupid Nazi.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ um **** lol. It carries planes.
you are seriously trying to sell me that an 'escort' AIRCRAFT CARRIER doesn't carry planes?
What the holy **** man
Your homo friend is fixated on the aircraft carriers, dick sucker.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Sep 2022, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ What other fantasies besides your make believe NAZI aircraft carriers and your make believe NAZI ICBMs would you like to share with the rest of us...?
GHETTOBLASTER » Today, 6:16 am » wrote: ↑Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Your homo friend is fixated on the aircraft carriers, dick sucker.
Yes.. they escorted convoys lol...by offering them air power....what the **** dudePastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ suck a dick, stupid Nazi.
“Escort carriers were too slow to keep up with the main forces consisting of fleet carriers, battleships, and cruisers. Instead, they were used to escort convoys, defending them from enemy threats such as submarines and planes. In the invasions of mainland Europe and Pacific islands, escort carriers provided air support to ground forces during amphibious operations. Escort carriers also served as backup aircraft transports for fleet carriers, and ferried aircraft of all military services to points of delivery.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escort_carrier