Trump says "...just grab 'em by the ******." And he gets 46% of the vote and is elected. But it's not what a system ****, it's what an ignorant/opportunistic electorate, with no social conscience the USA has.walkingstick » 07 Sep 2022, 8:48 pm » wrote: ↑ after biden reads his speeches. biden has no idea of what he babbled. but his rating goes up. what a system usa has.
Got some sort of poll that backs up this silly ****? You assholes never got over the international popularity of Barack Obama, either. It's your christian white supremacist cross to bear.
Put that limp dick back in your pants, quit waving it around and shut the **** up.
We should be selling nukes to Taiwan. Lots of Nukes. Let the Chinese come and take them.Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2022, 7:45 pm » wrote: ↑ He put his balls on the table on this one. Watch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dN20uvzqa_0
China is a superpower, because the only power that matters is economic power, and China is so valuable to the American people that perhaps we should be figuring out a way to gain economic independence from them and their cheap goods and sub contracted electronics. Of course the only way to do that is to tell the American people that everything they want is going to be costing them at least 25% more...and the American people will never go for that.LibDave » 07 Sep 2022, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ China isn't a super power. If China invades Taiwan they will pay a price heavier than any value they gain and in the end it will bring about their destruction. They are rattling their saber because they sense Biden is weak minded and will make a mistake and give them concessions. The only thing we have to fear is Biden's incompetence.
We are much more valuable to China as a friend than we are as an enemy. And much more valuable than Taiwan. They might make the mistake but I doubt it. Not for now. Some time out in the future but not now. That would be a BIG mistake.
Y'know...the educational level of some of those living in China and running the country doesn't matter. Like the Russians, the vast majority of Chinese, including their leadership, come from peasant stock. And if on any particular occasion one decides to push them too far, they'll just pick up an axe handle and whack you in the face with it, whether in the long run is does them any good or not.Skans » 08 Sep 2022, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ We should be selling nukes to Taiwan. Lots of Nukes. Let the Chinese come and take them.
Go **** yourself, chat tough guy.IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ Put that limp dick back in your pants, quit waving it around and shut the **** up.
Looks like a reply.
I do not care one way or the other about the "peasant stock" of the Chinese.IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑ Y'know...the educational level of some of those living in China and running the country doesn't matter. Like the Russians, the vast majority of Chinese, including their leadership, come from peasant stock. And if on any particular occasion one decides to push them too far, they'll just pick up an axe handle and whack you in the face with it, whether in the long run is does them any good or not.
No. It's belated, but still apt. We should have destroyed China during the Vietnam war. The United States should have completely ignored Vietnam and decimated China directly in the 1960's. We had the ability and resources to do this. Rather than sending men to die in the jungles of Vietnam, our leaders, Democrats who lacked any testicular fortitude whatsoever, should have launched an all out annihilation attack on China. We missed our opportunity. Now, under Democrat rule once again, we are too weak to do anything about China.So throwing around the idea of generating a nuclear winter is pretty **** stupid.
And, this is genuinely how all Democrats and Leftists view Humanity. Most lie about this. Most will never admit this. This is "bad for politics", but you are the rare Democrat who actually admits their core political belief here - that you believe humanity is the worst plague to ever strike this world.Humanity is the worst plague to ever strike this world.
Ulnar struck...BWAAAHAHAHAHAH!
Lookie here you hogs...it's the George S. Patton of NHB.
I didn't say "Nation Build" China.IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑ Lookie here you hogs...it's the George S. Patton of NHB.![]()
Yeh sure, destroy China and rack up an additional half million casualties. You're **** in the head.
You started with the Big Tough Talk.IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ Ulnar struck...BWAAAHAHAHAHAH!
Mirror...mirror...you spot it you got it. Go beat your woman (if there's a woman stupid enough to get involved with you), or your kids (if mother nature was stupid enough to let you reproduce) or kick the dog. That's your style, asshole.
I read what you said. You're **** in the head. Yeah we pushed the Chinese around in Korea and it cost us 40,000 lives in three years...ten thousand less than in Vietnam in ten years. And the Chinese in Korea weren't defending their homeland. You're **** nuts, particularly when you know how bombing the **** out of the Vietnamese in their homeland worked out.Skans » 08 Sep 2022, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't say "Nation Build" China.
I didn't say "Spread Democracy to China".
I didn't say "Make China A Better Country".
No, I said destroy it. Destroying China in the 1960's was quite feasible, but the Democrats in charge did not have the testicular fortitude to bomb it into oblivion.....AND THEN LEAVE!!
We were pussies in Korea because of Democrat Leadership. We should have been fighting China. Korea is irrelevant.IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ I read what you said. You're **** in the head. Yeah we pushed the Chinese around in Korea and it cost us 40,000 lives in three years...ten thousand less than in Vietnam in ten years. And the Chinese in Korea weren't defending their homeland. You're **** nuts, particularly when you know how bombing the **** out of the Vietnamese in their homeland worked out.
Transsexuals aren't part of the LGBTQ people, I thought that was what the 'T' stood for?Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ My only position on LBGTQ people and transsexuals is to leave them alone, and accord them the same rights as all other citizens.
I now know u just make up stuff. U cannot prove I am a Christian nor a white supremacist...IkeBana » 08 Sep 2022, 8:09 am » wrote: ↑ Got some sort of poll that backs up this silly ****? You assholes never got over the international popularity of Barack Obama, either. It's your christian white supremacist cross to bear.
I tend to agree - but taiwan is essentially a brown water target. China has the second largest carrier fleet on earth - not that carriers are needed for China to reach taiwan with air power. They could park 'em, and use their land bases.LibDave » 08 Sep 2022, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑
China has what is known as a brown water navy at the moment. They can control their rivers and their coastlines. They cannot control deep water. They have 30 submarines, only one is nuclear and it is decent. Wouldn't last long. The rest are diesel and should they invade Taiwan these would be relegated to port or destroyed in fairly short order. As for carriers they are quite lacking. The South China Sea islands would be neutralized and made ineffective in time.
Essentially, yes China could take Taiwan but would have all their international commerce cut off within a very short time. I don't know how long China could function on an economic basis without the ability to export so much as a teddy bear. And imports? Forget it. Food would become a problem for them over time. It will take a little more time for China to get to a point it would be a viable option.