The Nazis had the largest submarine fleet ever assembled. It was highly successful at sinking supply ships coming from the US and Canada. But then the Brits cracked the Nazi code and they knew where the subs were and sank them.SJConspirator » 09 Sep 2022, 9:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Nazi Germany did not have much of a navy. They were too busy fighting the Soviet Union on the land
was it they cracked the code or sonar(underwater radar) became more effective?Xavier_Onassis » 11 Sep 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ The Nazis had the largest submarine fleet ever assembled. It was highly successful at sinking supply ships coming from the US and Canada. But then the Brits cracked the Nazi code and they knew where the subs were and sank them.
Here is something I found interesting
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-b ... ired-18607
They are high IQ Nazi nitwits.Xavier_Onassis » 11 Sep 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑ The Nazis had the largest submarine fleet ever assembled. It was highly successful at sinking supply ships coming from the US and Canada. But then the Brits cracked the Nazi code and they knew where the subs were and sank them.
Here is something I found interesting
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-b ... ired-18607
If I see abuse happening in front of me I will act. I ain’t going to go looking for it.Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ So taking slaves is okay - as long as it isn't you.
Rapists aren't something you care about, as long as it doesn't affect you.
Got it, spook.
No skin in the game - not that your skin is worth a yankee dollar in the first place, Eb.
what was the ratio between the two, breaking the code or people getting more experience reading sonar results? 70/30 experience with new equipment or breaking the code.Xavier_Onassis » 11 Sep 2022, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ was it they cracked the code or sonar(underwater radar) became more effective?
It was most likely both.
The code gave to location coordinates and sonar told them how deep.
Books have been written about this. Get your library card and read all about it.
I do not claim to be an expert. I do know that the Germans had LOTS of subs and they were defeated because of improved technology of the Brits and the Americans.
When I witness a kidnapping I will jump into action.Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ So taking slaves is okay - as long as it isn't you.
Rapists aren't something you care about, as long as it doesn't affect you.
Got it, spook.
No skin in the game - not that your skin is worth a yankee dollar in the first place, Eb.
embezzling other persons' biological time to bring your reality to fruition buying their substance using symbolic value really is beyond just being dishonest about yourself.Pastafarian » 11 Sep 2022, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ When I witness a kidnapping I will jump into action.
Is paying slave wages okay? Cons never complain about that and it happens way more these days.
This is the only thing a cheap guy like you has. It's what beevee has. It's what every pedophile enabler has - "you don't wanna SAVE the kids we're molesting - you wanna molest them yourself."Pastafarian » 11 Sep 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑
You mad bcuz trans girls affects you preying on real girls.
Yeah - defending the crime, using *** as an excuse.
Cheap guy like me? I am only giving you a taste of your own medicine.Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ This is the only thing a cheap guy like you has. It's what beevee has. It's what every pedophile enabler has - "you don't wanna SAVE the kids we're molesting - you wanna molest them yourself."
You're a cheap punk with no game, running weak sauce invented out of house. You have other men's words coming out of your mouth and other men's ccocks going in.
There is no science behind the trans hysteria - so you can't use that.There is no morality or equity in the game - so you can't go there. The only thing you can do is accuse those trying to protect children of being jealous that THEY aren't the ones molesting them.
And the saddest, most telling part? You accidentally admit that trans girls are NOT real girls - which according to your *** narrative is a "transphobic" thing to say. You can't even keep your OWN horse **** straight, you **** midwit fruit. When you can't even SERVICE your narrative, it's no wonder that you cannot DEFEND it, and can only hide behind slandering those who embarrass you by questioning it.
You’re an idiot.
I really suggest you re read what you posted here. I see you admitting you are a child molester. you admitted your "we" do accusing another of wanting to try. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ This is the only thing a cheap guy like you has. It's what beevee has. It's what every pedophile enabler has - "you don't wanna SAVE the kids we're molesting - you wanna molest them yourself."
Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑ None of us are very likely to forget your verclemption when it fell to you to explicate a method by which honest money might be introduced... You became quite hysterical and shrill - not to mention jumpy and evasive and defensive....
Here's what it boils down to, fruit. A man who lets his wife convince his son he would be more loved without his nuts is a man who has no nuts.Pastafarian » 11 Sep 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Cheap guy like me? I am only giving you a taste of your own medicine.
I thought it was a cheap way to debate and argue but you set the rules, you just don’t like me abiding yo these rules.
There is a science behind it or it would not be a thing. I’ve posted some a whole back that you claim is not valid. Brain scans, psychological testing, ypu will accept none of it.
Okay, Groomer.Pastafarian » 11 Sep 2022, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ You’re an idiot.
How is stopping a crime from occurring, defending the crime?
omh » 11 Sep 2022, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I really suggest you re read what you posted here. I see you admitting you are a child molester. you admitted your "we" do accusing another of wanting to try. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha .
won't blame you for editing it.
Don't know if this has been mentioned but the Left never made up anything as unhelpful to truth and The American Way as "The Stolen Election", which Trump inaugurated in August, 2020, more than two months before the election, though he was behind in all the polls.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ It's **** amazing. I got in a silly argument about aircraft carriers with @Pastafarian ...I was suggesting they were required for major land invasioms from the sea.
This dude out of nowhere then just asserts there were no aircraft carriers present on d day.
I'm like...wtf? And after a quick Google search I discover the allies had 3 carriers present...hms emperor, hms tracker, and hms pursuer.
So clearly the dude just made up his story that there were no aircraft carriers...and why make that up? It's so easy to prove him wrong.
But here's the amazing g thing...I showed him proof and just a simple wiki page of one of these carriers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Emperor_(D98)
And the dude refuses to admit this is an aircraft carrier. Seriously.
Despite the **** table clearly stating that it carried 24 aircraft...pasta STILL refuses to admit mistake ..
HOW? Lol...and why is it always the lefty psychology that is like this?
We all remember your desperate scramble, fruity - and your repetitive misuse of/over-reliance on the word pro-rata, which you appeared to believe was magical - and your complete incompetence to present a cogent narrative.peepee » 11 Sep 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ ...nice try, puppet desantis cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] ...i told you that all of us could have an account with the treasury where new money could be issued to individuals pro-rata... duuuuuuh.....i also expressed amazement at your lack of imagination...[so typical of puppet desantis cacksuckers (and monetary ignoramuses)]...
Oh, I shoved your inane screeches up your *** and down your throat until they met in the middle, fruity. I'm sure it was embarrassing, being reminded of it, trump fluffer.peepee » 11 Sep 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ ...[ever notice how these ptc's and mi's never merely copy and paste MY words and then critique MY words...i always copy and paste their gd fool words/ideas and then rub their f@cking fool puppet-sucking noses in it...winning....won...and thanks to lf for allowing the complete trashing of the republicrat-level ideas....]
lol so since all you care about is who lost wars, i can assume you scoff at the native americans as dismal failures as wellXavier_Onassis » 11 Sep 2022, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑ I was not referring to the number of aircraft, I was referring to the number of troops that were airborne, and the number of troops delivered by gliders far outnumbered the number of pilots and others involved in the invasion.
The D Day invasion was primarily a seaborne and land operation. And it succeeded because Hitler was successfully deceived and had way more troops in places other than Normandy. Hitler was not always a clever strategist.
After all, he LOST. And before he blew his brains out, millions and millions of Germans died because of his unnecessary aggression against his neighbors.
Hitler was a failure. Naziism is a failure. You are an apprentice to a deceased failed cause.