I don't have to stick with it, I exist within it same as everything else specifically occupying the moment here never same total sum as individually or as a whole universe present.
Cannonpointer » 12 Sep 2022, 6:58 am » wrote: ↑ That is the gay narrative you desperately wish you could get ANYONE to believe.
The people who care already saw the beat down I gave you on this topic - which obviously still burns, fruity. You aren't going to bluff their memory of the event away.
The people who DON'T care aren't reading this, Trump fluffer.
If you want your future beatdowns copy-pasted, perform better, fruity. Your limp performance doesn't merit being memorialized.peepee » 12 Sep 2022, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑
...[...psssst...all you have to do is copy and paste 'the beat down' if you're telling the truth...
jack » 12 Sep 2022, 4:43 am » wrote: ↑ Comes a voice from the side of the political spectrum that feeds entirely on social media, that wouldn't be caught dead with a serious book.
....spoken like a whipped puppet trump/desantis/republican cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] ....Cannonpointer » 12 Sep 2022, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ If you want your future beatdowns copy-pasted, perform better, fruity. Your limp performance doesn't merit being memorialized.
It's okay. Everyone sees through my lies - don't worry. Everyone knows that you beat the bark off me.
All right, let's unpack the second part of your reply. Is "Your" a reference to the person you are addressing, i.e. me, or are you making a general observation? Since you don't know me I assume the latter. So, one question: isn't accepting "your reality is a constant state of denying why you exist" (whatever this means) an "intellectual choice"?omh » 12 Sep 2022, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ Sarcasm noted. Your intellectual choices show you rather pretend life isn't real than accept your reality is a constant state of denying why you exist in the first place.
Yet peepee is a well know liar whose claims are worthless.peepee » 21 Aug 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑
21 Aug 2022, 9:04 am
."this from someone who says he hates jewish people" ...
HEYY PEEPEE.....KEEP LYING ABOUT WHAT I NEVER SAID .... YOUR REPUTATION AS A PATHETIC LIAR CAN'T GET ANY WORSE.peepee » Yesterday, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑Yesterday, 8:57 am
peepee » 25 Jul 2022, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑25 Jul 2022, 9:46 am
Image Image
."this from someone who says he hates jewish people" ...
Cannonpointer » 12 Sep 2022, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ It's okay. Everyone sees through my lies - don't worry. Everyone knows that you beat the bark off me.
Harold Bloom, the late great literary critic once said that if he could take only two books with him to a desert island they would be The King James Bible and a single volume copy of Shakespeare's plays and sonnets - "serious books" even if fanciful. Your last question is not any more relevant to this thread than the irrelevant fact you read engineering books.GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Sep 2022, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑ In your Parallel Universe you see crowds of Social Media addicted Conservatives with their faces buried at all times in their ELECTRONIC BABY SITTERS...?![]()
In your opinion what is a "SERIOUS BOOK"...?
The most serious books I own are full of ways to perform engineering calculations.
What have YOU ever designed and built on your own...?
...i sense the lying puppet trump/republican cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus] will now ask for your college math transcripts!!jack » 12 Sep 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ Harold Bloom, the late great literary critic once said that if he could take only two books with him to a desert island they would be The King James Bible and a single volume copy of Shakespeare's plays and sonnets - "serious books" even if fanciful. Your last question is not any more relevant to this thread than the irrelevant fact you read engineering books.
So in other words you shot your mouth off with a couple very stupid comments ...I called your bluff.....and all you have is this weak nonsense in return.jack » 12 Sep 2022, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑ Harold Bloom, the late great literary critic once said that if he could take only two books with him to a desert island they would be The King James Bible and a single volume copy of Shakespeare's plays and sonnets - "serious books" even if fanciful. Your last question is not any more relevant to this thread than the irrelevant fact you read engineering books.

In other words, it is "nonsense", in your typically illiterate opinion, for Shakespeare's works and The King James to be thought of as "serious books".GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Sep 2022, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑ So in other words you shot your mouth off with a couple very stupid comments ...I called your bluff.....and all you have is this weak nonsense in return.
Maybe next time you'll think things through better before you decide to go off "HALF COCKED"...?
^ I put this girl on ice so bad she had to answer twice.peepee » 12 Sep 2022, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
...i don't give a f@ck about your lies... i feast on your stooooooooooooooooooooopidity, puppet trump/desantis cacksucker [and monetary ignoramus]
@Pastafarian is right. Aircraft carriers were just fancy hood ornaments for Republican limousines. Clearly, it was American storm-rifles "Assault Rifles" that won the war in Europe.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑ How the actual **** can you pretend to know what is useful? You just made up out of nowhere that they were not used...and then you could not even read words you posted your own **** self. And now...you can't even admit that you are acting insane...Forgive me but nobody is going to consider you an expert on aircraft carriers
doesn't change per individual or the whole food chain so imagine why everyone in your ancestry prefers to ignore how genetics eternally separated each person in your family tree since inception of Homo Sapiens compounding DNA results here now as specific as numbers occupying space in this moment here.jack » 12 Sep 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ All right, let's unpack the second part of your reply. Is "Your" a reference to the person you are addressing, i.e. me, or are you making a general observation? Since you don't know me I assume the latter. So, one question: isn't accepting "your reality is a constant state of denying why you exist" (whatever this means) an "intellectual choice"?
YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT THIS SILLY **** UP..AND SO I SHOVED IT RIGHT BACK IN YOUR SILLY FACE.jack » 12 Sep 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑ In other words, it is "nonsense", in your typically illiterate opinion, for Shakespeare's works and The King James to be thought of as "serious books".

You need to moderate your opinion of yourself. Say to around the smallest fraction you can manage.GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Sep 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ YOU'RE THE ONE WHO BROUGHT THIS SILLY **** UP..AND SO I SHOVED IT RIGHT BACK IN YOUR SILLY FACE.
NOW I'LL JUST LET SILLY BOY JACK SPEND ALL DAY FRETTING ABOUT WHO SPENDS MORE TIME ON SOCIAL MEDIA AND WHO READS THE MOST "SERIOUS BOOKS".
"What the f is up with the lefty tendency to just make stuff up?"jack » 12 Sep 2022, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑ You need to moderate your opinion of yourself. Say to around the smallest fraction you can manage.
jack » 12 Sep 2022, 4:43 am » wrote: ↑jack
Comes a voice from the side of the political spectrum that feeds entirely on social media, that wouldn't be caught dead with a serious book.
FOS claims the Nazis needed an aircraft carrier to invade the UK. I merely mentioned that aircraft carriers are not necessary when the Allies invaded Normandy. Planes could not even take off from escort carriers in the rough English Channel waters.Skans » 12 Sep 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ @Pastafarian is right. Aircraft carriers were just fancy hood ornaments for Republican limousines. Clearly, it was American storm-rifles "Assault Rifles" that won the war in Europe.
And, if you believe that, then you are a retarded Democrat.
ok, pedo.Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, Groomer.
You're a crime stopper.
And I'm a cantaloupe.