Okay, Groomer. You're mad because I busted your *** out when you **** up and admitted that you do not consider trannies real females - whch is an admission they do NOT belong in, or have any right to, women's sports and showers.
What if it’s the husband’s fault?Cannonpointer » 11 Sep 2022, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Here's what it boils down to, fruit. A man who lets his wife convince his son he would be more loved without his nuts is a man who has no nuts.
CLEARLY, you would not expect other men to do that which YOU would not do. So we know if the woman you married decides to feminize your son Martin and thereby castrate you by proxy, you're gonna go along. You're gonna put up with that like the panty waist your mama raised. You're gonna let your own son get played and nut-cut. And you can mumble some partisan pseudo-science about brain scans.
And that makes you a worthless piece of **** who does not deserve to have a son. You won't protect him - why should God let you have him, you **** waste of a sac?
I’m never mad.Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, Groomer. You're mad because I busted your *** out when you **** up and admitted that you do not consider trannies real females - whch is an admission they do NOT belong in, or have any right to, women's sports and showers.
So, your "It's not my business" dodge = women's rights is "not your business."
What would the world be like, if women had said that *** rights are not THEIR business, fruity? The answer is, you're a punk. A cheap little sold-out punk who lacks the balls to stand with women for their rights.
You are on record supporting the right of the confused to impose on women, you lying sack of garbage - and now, you are on record panty-dancing away from your previous position. When I abandon a position, I do it like man, you cheap little punk,Pastafarian » 13 Sep 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ I’m never mad.
Busting my *** was your wet dream was about last night.
I’ve already admitted trans women should compete in their own leagues.
Trans women in women’s sports affects real women and their ambitions. That’s why I disagree on that.
a trans person wants to dress and feel like a real woman? It ain’t hurt in’ nobody except you Jesus freaks.
What about their showers, fruitcake?Pastafarian » 13 Sep 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Trans women in women’s sports affects real women and their ambitions. That’s why I disagree on that.
a trans person wants to dress and feel like a real woman? It ain’t hurt in’ nobody except you Jesus freaks.
Well, I'm not about to play armchair QB when it comes to what COULD HAVE won WWII for either side. Fact is, the US did have aircraft carriers; that's my only point.Pastafarian » 13 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ FOS claims the Nazis needed an aircraft carrier to invade the UK. I merely mentioned that aircraft carriers are not necessary when the Allies invaded Normandy. Planes could not even take off from escort carriers in the rough English Channel waters.
FOS is a high IQ Nazi nitwit.
Pastafarian » 13 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑ FOS claims the Nazis needed an aircraft carrier to invade the UK. I merely mentioned that aircraft carriers are not necessary when the Allies invaded Normandy. Planes could not even take off from escort carriers in the rough English Channel waters.
FOS is a high IQ Nazi nitwit.
Pastafarian » 13 Sep 2022, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What if it’s the husband’s fault?
I have no experience dealing with a trans child. And I’m not about to speculate as to why they want to be women.
I’ve not seen much heroics from you except to whine about it on this anonymous forum.
I might have two sons soon. You jealous?
If any of my sons want to transition, that’s up to them when they become adults.
bcuz no airplanes too k off from aircraft carriers on DDay.FOS » 13 Sep 2022, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑ how do you knoyothe allies didn't need them? Apparently they were used for defense against u boats...which seems really **** important to me. In the English Channel? Maybe not...and so what? You clearly are not some sort of naval expert and stop pretending to be.
Now...furthermore...landing in the uk would be a lot more difficult roam landing basically anywhere in Europe. Cause the uk is an island, you see. So your whole comparison is fundamentally flawed anyway. I am not some naval expert either but I think I know a lot more than you, lol.
I never said we didn’t have them.Skans » 13 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I'm not about to play armchair QB when it comes to what COULD HAVE won WWII for either side. Fact is, the US did have aircraft carriers; that's my only point.
Pastafarian » 14 Sep 2022, 7:17 am » wrote: ↑ bcuz no airplanes too k off from aircraft carriers on DDay.
More difficult than landing on fortified beaches in Normandy?
...much more importantly the U$/alliance had the bankster$/plutocrat$, ptc and mi...Skans » 13 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, I'm not about to play armchair QB when it comes to what COULD HAVE won WWII for either side. Fact is, the US did have aircraft carriers; that's my only point.
Is that French for "I like old, rich cocks in my ***?" I don't speak French, but sounds about right.peepee » 14 Sep 2022, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑ ...much more importantly the U$/alliance had the bankster$/plutocrat$, ptc and mi...
Skans » 14 Sep 2022, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑ I'm a brain-laundered @sshole who watched the PBS series on WW2. Furthermore, I'm a monetary ignoramus who sucks Republican puppet cack. Always have. Always will.
Dude, you're gross.peepee » 14 Sep 2022, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑I am a bi-sexual who enjoys both Semite-cock cock in my *** and French cock in my mouth. Don't judge me, because I read about my bi-sexual adventures to your 5-year old kids in Public School.
Over and over, you have blithely supported CHILDREN transitioning. I showed you doing so, and you responded, "AND???"Pastafarian » 14 Sep 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑ If any of my sons want to transition, that’s up to them when they become adults.
Tell that to a dick sucker named pasta, pasta.
Keep dancing for me, ***.Pastafarian » 30 Mar 2022, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Since trans kids is a thing OR HERE? and some do take puberty blockers, I see no problem with competing with girls then.Pastafarian » 14 Sep 2022, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑Children aren’t getting their junk chopped off. ARE YOU LYING HERE?
How about this: public showers should be divided into stalls, so no bather has any view of any other bather's sexual equipment.Cannonpointer » 13 Sep 2022, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑ What about their showers, fruitcake?
Do women have a right to penis-free showers?
Nice dodge, fruity. Now, answer the question in the real world instead of the should world.Xavier_Onassis » 14 Sep 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑ How about this: public showers should be divided into stalls, so no bather has any view of any other bather's sexual equipment.
I support whatever a family and their dr decides is their best course of action.Cannonpointer » 14 Sep 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑ Over and over, you have blithely supported CHILDREN transitioning. I showed you doing so, and you responded, "AND???"
ALL OF A SUDDEN, you back down and abandon ship.
******.
Tell that to a dick sucker named pasta, pasta.
Keep dancing for me, ***.![]()
![]()