Vikings, Franch, saxons, romans, scots, spanish, germans, dutch - pretty sure that covers it, if you ignore all the American bases there "by invitation." But it wasn't the UK for most of those - they were pre-UK.Neo » 08 Sep 2022, 6:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Didn't many of the landing craft launch from carriers? I know most of the air support flew in from surrounding territories.....
when has the uk been invaded?
https://i.postimg.cc/GhfBpsgt/6bz7ma.jpg
Is it true that 30,573 PANICKED LIBERALS DIED FROM "MAINLINING" CLOROX after Trump did nothing more than to MENTION THAT BLEACH HAS BEEN INVESTIGATED AS A POSSIBLE TREATMENT...?


FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ It's **** amazing. I got in a silly argument about aircraft carriers with @Pastafarian ...I was suggesting they were required for major land invasioms from the sea.
This dude out of nowhere then just asserts there were no aircraft carriers present on d day.
I'm like...wtf? And after a quick Google search I discover the allies had 3 carriers present...hms emperor, hms tracker, and hms pursuer.
So clearly the dude just made up his story that there were no aircraft carriers...and why make that up? It's so easy to prove him wrong.
But here's the amazing g thing...I showed him proof and just a simple wiki page of one of these carriers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Emperor_(D98)
And the dude refuses to admit this is an aircraft carrier. Seriously.
Despite the **** table clearly stating that it carried 24 aircraft...pasta STILL refuses to admit mistake ..
HOW? Lol...and why is it always the lefty psychology that is like this?
Xavier_Onassis » 08 Sep 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Let the word go forth to every city, town, village, hamlet and farmstead in this land that Fos the Nazi is indeed a lying sack of ****!
Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑ They did not lie. Aircraft carriers were used in the Pacific, Atlantic, Africa and Italy but they could not be used for aircraft Ilona the English Channel. They carried ground artillery, jeeps and planes. But the planes did not take off from them on D-Day. After the invasion tge carriers were relocated in tge waters northwest of yge Uk.
The high IQ superior intellect Nazi needs basic **** explained to him bcuz he is too lazy to research it or most likely he doesn’t like the answers.
...wiki's descriptions of fascism are brilliant, right dud?FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 5:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Dude...Wikipedia is a lot more reliable than some random history forum
What makes up facts made up historically setting precedence of social behavior ignoring the core of how living evolves forward now. as biologically existing in compounding DNA replacements present changing total sum population remaining each generation gap present.FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ It's **** amazing. I got in a silly argument about aircraft carriers with @Pastafarian ...I was suggesting they were required for major land invasioms from the sea.
This dude out of nowhere then just asserts there were no aircraft carriers present on d day.
I'm like...wtf? And after a quick Google search I discover the allies had 3 carriers present...hms emperor, hms tracker, and hms pursuer.
So clearly the dude just made up his story that there were no aircraft carriers...and why make that up? It's so easy to prove him wrong.
But here's the amazing g thing...I showed him proof and just a simple wiki page of one of these carriers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Emperor_(D98)
And the dude refuses to admit this is an aircraft carrier. Seriously.
Despite the **** table clearly stating that it carried 24 aircraft...pasta STILL refuses to admit mistake ..
HOW? Lol...and why is it always the lefty psychology that is like this?
All day long? Maybe for your long-winded diatribes.LincolnNebraska » 08 Sep 2022, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ *** claims to be a black man with a thriving psychology practice. He claims a wife and two kids. He claims his "wife" is expecting their third child in January.
And yet, the troll sits here all day and looks up stuff on WWII.
The old white homo is hilarious!
we are naming our next child, January.LincolnNebraska » 08 Sep 2022, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ *** claims to be a black man with a thriving psychology practice. He claims a wife and two kids. He claims his "wife" is expecting their third child in January.
And yet, the troll sits here all day and looks up stuff on WWII.
The old white homo is hilarious!
FOS » 08 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ It's **** amazing. I got in a silly argument about aircraft carriers with @Pastafarian ...I was suggesting they were required for major land invasioms from the sea.
This dude out of nowhere then just asserts there were no aircraft carriers present on d day.
I'm like...wtf? And after a quick Google search I discover the allies had 3 carriers present...hms emperor, hms tracker, and hms pursuer.
So clearly the dude just made up his story that there were no aircraft carriers...and why make that up? It's so easy to prove him wrong.
But here's the amazing g thing...I showed him proof and just a simple wiki page of one of these carriers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Emperor_(D98)
And the dude refuses to admit this is an aircraft carrier. Seriously.
Despite the **** table clearly stating that it carried 24 aircraft...pasta STILL refuses to admit mistake ..
HOW? Lol...and why is it always the lefty psychology that is like this?
Got anything important to add. PIG.. Arent you a genius!murdock » 10 Sep 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ All the bitches do is lie. You offer any proof and they just lie more.