Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Anyone can write on Wikipedia. It isn’t always correct.
I found an historical source and posted it.

peepee » 10 Sep 2022, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ ...wiki's descriptions of fascism are brilliant, right dud?
C'mon, spill, Loquotion. What's the rest of the name?
They should stop getting their information from the United Negro Knowledge Fund.DeplorablePatriot » 10 Sep 2022, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ FOS, I claim the answer is a simple one. They can't do battle and win when the other guy uses truth in their arsenal. Making **** up just prolongs their inevitable failure.
January Martina or Martin.Cannonpointer » 10 Sep 2022, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ C'mon, spill, Loquotion. What's the rest of the name?
January what? Shaquay? Jerezibal? Föquantä? Azikabiä? January Shanaynay?
SPILL!
My info was right.Cannonpointer » 10 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑ They should stop getting their information from the United Negro Knowledge Fund.
Damn thang is bankrupt.
It’s my Catholic upbringing.Cannonpointer » 10 Sep 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, you're no fun. You call yourself an of-colored?
Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ My info was right.
Your boyfriend claimed the Nazis needed aircraft carriers to invade UK.
The Normandy Invasion proves his hypothesis wrong.
I know Nazis hate being corrected by inferior races but damn, **** Von Suckadick is a high IQ nitwit.
https://i.imgflip.com/6sy9vl.jpg
**** off.
Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 5:49 pm » wrote: ↑ **** off.
Im only referring to my parents and intimate family not the pedo priests.
THE OP CLAIMED THAT HITLERS LACK OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS WAS PROOF HE DID NOT PLAN ON CONQUERING THE WORLD.Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ My info was right.
Your boyfriend claimed the Nazis needed aircraft carriers to invade UK.
The Normandy Invasion proves his hypothesis wrong.
I know Nazis hate being corrected by inferior races but damn, **** Von Suckadick is a high IQ nitwit.
I do not empower and support crimes.Cannonpointer » 10 Sep 2022, 6:03 pm » wrote: ↑ I, too, exempt myself from the sins I empower and support.
MY mom isn't responsible for America's war mongering. YOURS is.
Hitler admired the Brit’s. I never claimed otherwise. But he knew Churchill would not back down from fighting him. He was cornered by Churchill to fight the British.GHETTOBLASTER » 10 Sep 2022, 6:18 pm » wrote: ↑ THE OP CLAIMED THAT HITLERS LACK OF AIRCRAFT CARRIERS WAS PROOF HE DID NOT PLAN ON CONQUERING THE WORLD.
HE BROUGHT UP DUNKIRK AS PROOF HITLER DID NOT WANT TO OBLITERATE ENGLAND AT THAT STAGE OF THE GAME...HITLER SHOWED THOSE POOR HELPLESS BRITISH TROOPS SOME MERCY.
Mysteries of the World War II: Why Hitler Didn’t Destroy the British at Dunkirk - Learning Mind (learning-mind.com)
This took me 30 seconds to find that link and I had 100% confidence that I would find proof you are a totally full of **** LIAR and that FOS is 100% correct.....
Knew him well huh?Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ . Hitler could easily use the Brits carriers after conquering the UK. That’s what he was planning on.
Hitler was a big time opportunist.
The link I provided proves you are FULL OF ****.Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Hitler admired the Brit’s. I never claimed otherwise. But he knew Churchill would not back down from fighting him. He was cornered by Churchill to fight the British.
The London Blitz took care of any affections Hitler had for the British.
But your ***-tickling buddy was wrong. Hitler could easily use the Brits carriers after conquering the UK. That’s what he was planning on.