No, just an asshole problem.
He was t a dentist. He was a policeman who took an oath to serve and protect.DeezerShoove » 08 Sep 2022, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ No, just an asshole problem.
The **** guy could just as easily have been a dentist. They're kinda depressed too, ya know.
yeah from this....an I got lots more if you want to see itPastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He was t a dentist. He was a policeman who took an oath to serve and protect.

Nothing about being an asshole though, right?Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He was t a dentist. He was a policeman who took an oath to serve and protect.
That guy earned those pills. He laid hands on a man with a gun - ON THAT MAN'S PROPERTY (google "quiet enjoyment").
One of the folks he has a duty to protect is himself.Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He was t a dentist. He was a policeman who took an oath to serve and protect.
Kayroniqua wuh mayud.nefarious101 » 08 Sep 2022, 5:15 pm » wrote: ↑ yeah from this....an I got lots more if you want to see it
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfz4br-CZAM
Literally.Cucurbitophobia » 08 Sep 2022, 6:01 pm » wrote: ↑ He got what he asked for. I heard him repeatedly say "shoot me".
How was the shooter the asshole?DeezerShoove » 08 Sep 2022, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nothing about being an asshole though, right?
I guess you can blame the next cop you see, too.
Pastafarian » 08 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm » wrote: ↑ He was t a dentist. He was a policeman who took an oath to serve and protect.

If the shooter had been black, pasta would be laughing at the fool who earned a couple of gut-shots.GHETTOBLASTER » 08 Sep 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Your first duty is to defend yourself and your loved ones.
Only some totally out of touch idiot WHO NEVER TOOK ANY OATH TO DEFEND ANYTHING would not be able to understand that.
That's right..Cannonpointer » 08 Sep 2022, 9:45 pm » wrote: ↑ If the shooter had been black, pasta would be laughing at the fool who earned a couple of gut-shots.

I tire of watching people seek "Oh lookee! Bad cop, bad cop" videos.Cannonpointer » 08 Sep 2022, 9:42 pm » wrote: ↑ How was the shooter the asshole?
Did HE lay hands on another man? Did HE go to another man's house and assault him?
I watched the vid. I saw a bullet magnet attract a couple of bullets.
I'm petfectly happy to bash lots of groups when merited. But that guy could have been a jew banker and I'd have still called this a good shoot.DeezerShoove » 09 Sep 2022, 6:52 am » wrote: ↑ I tire of watching people seek "Oh lookee! Bad cop, bad cop" videos.
Didn't watch it myself.
I'm sure you are not too far off the mark in your assessment.
My comment only had to do with a habitual ritual boor poster.
Confirmation bias thread.
The property belongs to the man who was shot.Cannonpointer » 08 Sep 2022, 9:32 pm » wrote: ↑ That guy earned those pills. He laid hands on a man with a gun - ON THAT MAN'S PROPERTY (google "quiet enjoyment").
If I lay hands on someone, it will be an unarmed woman or child.
Am I a coward? Maybe. Am I in the ICU? Definitely not.
If I am armed, and another man lays hands on me, he's going down - no question. I am no kind of cop lover. But the fact that the assault victim who stood his ground is an off duty cop has no bearing on the fact that he was at HIS HOME, and was assaulted at HIS HOME.
We retreat TO our homes - not FROM our homes.
The shooter acted as a citizen - not s a cop. He was at home - not on duty. He was assaulted: another man laid hands on him in anger. That moron was a bullet magnet, and now he's a house plant.
Pretend the shooter was black You would be taking his side. You would clearly see the bullet magnet sat pretty for it, attacking a man with a gun. Never bring a mouth and a shove to a gun fight.
Pastafarian » 10 Sep 2022, 6:49 am » wrote: ↑ The property belongs to the man who was shot.
Pulling a gun on an unarmed man is about as cowardly as one can get. The gun puller escalated the situation every time.
You are dishonest as ****. I’ve never defended a black cop whose acted inappropriately.
