Damn, if that is true (which it is NOT) then I need more pollution in the Central Texas area where I live because we have been in an extreme drought for several years now.ScottMon » 03 Oct 2022, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑ False. All rain stems from cold air and accumulation of humidity around particles in the atmosphere. The more particles in the atmosphere, the more likely the rain will accumulate. Pollution are considered particles.
nefarious101 » 13 Sep 2022, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Migrants killing dogs, stealing from homes prompts some Texas border town residents to arm themselves
Border town residents describe how mass migration has made them feel unsafe, despite Kamala Harris' claim that 'the border is secure'
https://www.foxnews.com/us/migrants-kil ... themselves
Agw zealots won't admit it but any reasonable person with average mental faculties can entertain their suggestions and take them to their logical conclusions. Wind, solar, tidal, geothermal aren't going to be enough. We need to reduce the population of the climate destroying human cancer by 6 billion persons or so. Nothing less will have the required impact.Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ IF and IF that were true what do you propose be done about it without destroying the earth and civilization along with it...or are you for that you **** idiot?
How are those agw zealots going to control volcanic eruptions that spew CO2 into the atmosphere that affect the earth's climate?Neo » 03 Oct 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Agw zealots won't admit it but any reasonable person with average mental faculties can entertain their suggestions and take them to their logical conclusions. Wind, solar, tidal, geothermal aren't going to be enough. We need to reduce the population of the climate destroying human cancer by 6 billion persons or so. Nothing less will have the required impact.
I see when scottyboi is challenged he disappears. This has happened before.
You are confusing climate and environment. Can't really blame you, this confusion is deliberately installed to take advantage of the ignorant.ScottMon » 03 Oct 2022, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑ That's literally impossible. Light a match, You change the climate in a tiny way. To say that the match doesn't change the climate is to violate the 1st law of thermodynamics. So consider the millions of cars on the road, Each one making changes to the climate. Each smokestack, Each lawnmower, Each cow.
Climate is part of the environment. You can't seperate them.Neo » 03 Oct 2022, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑ You are confusing climate and environment. Can't really blame you, this confusion is deliberately installed to take advantage of the ignorant.
It's well known that every raindrop has a particle in its center. That particle is often pollution.Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 10:49 am » wrote: ↑ Damn, if that is true (which it is NOT) then I need more pollution in the Central Texas area where I live because we have been in an extreme drought for several years now.
I'm still here and you're wrong.Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I see when scottyboi is challenged he disappears. This has happened before.
The **** you can't.ScottMon » 03 Oct 2022, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Climate is part of the environment. You can't seperate them.
No air pollution=no rain is a pro pollution argument.ScottMon » 03 Oct 2022, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ It's well known that every raindrop has a particle in its center. That particle is often pollution.
Dusty rain: Why does rain leave a residue behind and where does it come from? | New Scientist
Rain needs particles to form. That's settled science for decades.Neo » 03 Oct 2022, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑ No air pollution=no rain is a pro pollution argument.
And no, rain falls regardless of particulate pollution. Clouds form regardless of particulate pollution, they lose mass as a function of temp and pressure density altitude. A first year pilot knows this and I am going on 30.
American Association For The Advancement Of ScienceScottMon » 03 Oct 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Rain needs particles to form. That's settled science for decades.
No, I say YOU are wrong!!!
A fairy tale:Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I say YOU are wrong!!!
Why are their droughts and monsoons? Dirt/dust is NOT pollution!!!
Tldr. It's the **** giant ball of thermonuclear energy at the center of the solar system that drives climate on earth.Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ "The concept of an anthropogenic global warming (AGW) driven by the increase in atmospheric CO2 is compared to the concept of a natural global warming (NGW) driven by solar variability. The application of the AGW concept only rests on models, whilst the NGW concept rests on multiple observational and evidence-based facts. Even more so, the long-term solar variability predicts a new Grand Solar Minimum with severe climatic conditions (type Little Ice Age) to occur in 2030-2050. This violates all talk about an increasing, even accelerating, global warming. Similarly, there is no true treat of a future sea level rise flooding lowlands and islands."
Do the magic ******, al goresand lurch kerrys know something the rest of us don't. Their beachfront MILLION$ mansion say they don't beleive the **** they peddle to the proletariat...
https://www.scirp.org/journal/PaperInfo ... erID=87829
https://sciencestruck.com/what-causes-monsoonsNeo » 03 Oct 2022, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Tldr. It's the **** giant ball of thermonuclear energy at the center of the solar system that drives climate on earth.
Acid rain and air pollution: 50 years of progress in environmental science and policy - PubMed (nih.gov)Buffalo » 03 Oct 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I say YOU are wrong!!!
Why are their droughts and monsoons? Dirt/dust is NOT pollution!!!
Pollution has **** all to do with climate.