Making social consensus imagined possible rule of law ordering ancestral progression to obey idealists or become eliminated by society on moral grounds, legal precedence, ethical situation scenarios, economic performance serving humanity, protecting reasonable doubt typecasting ancestral positions into stereotyped definitions of who's who here now.
This is based upon some assumptions. First off, You believe that the MSM wouldn't be covering this if they could prove it. This is clearly false because this would be driving rating and Fox wouldn't shut it down in a heartbeat.Cannonpointer » 19 Sep 2022, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ You're thinking of the Kavanaugh situation.
The daughter's diary isn't mud - it's a victim's outcry.
WOMEN HAVE A RIGHT TO BE BELIEVED, fruitcake.
Dumbduck is a two headed freak.nuckinfutz » 19 Sep 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Shut the **** up DUCK! And get back in your **** hole on the other site!![]()
![]()
Because you blew your negative rep points wad, loser?
what is time displacement? event horizons an object of molecular or cellular substance individual gaseous, liquid, mineral or combination occupying space for the time it individually exists parallel in series to everything else evolving now to each cycle present.Xavier_Onassis » 20 Sep 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ All living never exceeds occupying space as displaced now.
WTF does this even mean?
Is space ever displaced?
How does one displace space?
It you displace a space from A to B, then does the former area formerly occupied by the displacement become a vacuum?
Nature ABHORS a vacuum, sole.
set a retroactive precedence into laws governing social loyalty or facts sustaining charges of dishonoring what humanity should have been by now.FOS » 19 Sep 2022, 11:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I looked into this issue years ago.
There was NEVER any statute of limitations on molesting children. Never was a thing. So what did his bill REALLY do?
How many genders are there?ScottMon » 19 Sep 2022, 10:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You guys say this diary exists but damn if any of you can prove it.
It's proved - they're not.ScottMon » 20 Sep 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑ This is based upon some assumptions. First off, You believe that the MSM wouldn't be covering this if they could prove it. This is clearly false because this would be driving rating and Fox wouldn't shut it down in a heartbeat.
Oh really? Who proved that the diary was actually Ashley Biden?Cannonpointer » 20 Sep 2022, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ It's proved - they're not.
Take your mealy mouthing to a different pair of trousers.
Where's the proof the diary is legit?Warcok » 20 Sep 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ How many genders are there?
Now read this..
https://wbckfm.com/new-pew-study-white- ... m=referral
ScottMon » 20 Sep 2022, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh really? Who proved that the diary was actually Ashley Biden?
Link her DENYING it, you **** asswipe.
Show me her owning it. Shut me up.
Got nothing?Cannonpointer » 20 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Link her DENYING it, you **** asswipe.
The people who stole it are facing being sentenced to PRISON. They had to forfeit the money because they were trafficking in stolen goods.
There is no shutting you up - you have no capacity for embarrassment. The new york times has said it's her diary. The entire mainstream media admits it. She has not denied it. Hnd writing experts affirm it.
Fine. Prove it.Cannonpointer » 20 Sep 2022, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no shutting you up - you have no capacity for embarrassment. The new york times has said it's her diary. The entire mainstream media admits it.