Liberal Forum

So he broke the law and was blocking the entrance of a business.

Pretty cut a dry.

You cant do that at any business.

The right wing stopped unions from doing this years ago.

Now the law comes to protect something the right wing doesn't like and now it's bad.



You gotta love these right wingers.

Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:06 am

What are they raiding the place for roadkill?

Was a crime committed. 

You know the f.b.i can't raid with a judge owing it correct?

You mean like when the FBI used the fake Russian dossier to get a warrant to spy on Trump's campaign?  

It's been clear to the adults in the room that the FBI/DOJ are corrupt. But hey...stay useful.  

Did you notice the "not guilty" part?  
 
A raid was for photo ops to intimidate people.

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:17 am

You mean like when the FBI used the fake Russian dossier to get a warrant to spy on Trump's campaign?  

It's been clear to the adults in the room that the FBI/DOJ are corrupt. But hey...stay useful.  

Did you notice the "not guilty" part?  
 
A raid was for photo ops to intimidate people.

What were they looking for?

You cant just make a reciaion without a judge approving it roadkill


What will he be charged with in the future?



T
 

Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:08 am

So he broke the law and was blocking the entrance of a business.

Pretty cut a dry.

You cant do that at any business.

Do you not understand what not guilty means?

Huey » 31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am

Do you not understand what not guilty means?

Wat were they looking for?

I guess I got to keep it short or roadkill gets confused.

You honestly think the f.b.i would raid somebody without probably cause with republican running the house.

How stupid do you think they are roadkill.

Hopefully that wasn't too long for you to understand roadkill.

Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:20 am

What were they looking for?

You cant just make a reciaion without a judge approving it roadkill

What will he be charged with in the future?

T

Either the judge was corrupt or the FBI was not honest when they sought the warrant.

I know yer just doing this to obscure the "not guilty" verdict.   

Huey » 31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am

Do you not understand what not guilty means?

Justthecrap is gaslighting.  It's what useful people do.     

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 5:50 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 5:50 am

The dems would call Bv a good soldier (useful).

"Pro-Life Activist Mark Houck Found Not Guilty of Violating FACE Act"

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023 ... -face-act/

bump

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 6:32 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:32 am

Either the judge was corrupt or the FBI was not honest when they sought the warrant.

I know yer just doing this to obscure the "not guilty" verdict.

or you have no clue and don't want to actually look into it. 

You want it so bad to be corruption that you paint it that way.
​​​

Just so you can play the victim. 

Do a little research and get back to me. 

There is a set of steps the f.b.i has to go through to do this sort of thing. 

Do ypu know them or are you trying to pull the corruption card?

       

You see it looks nice having crying children thrown in just tp pull on the heart strings.

If you don't know the process roadkill I can show the people the actual process the f.b.i has to go through before doing this.

Just to educate you?

Huey » 31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:22 am

Do you not understand what not guilty means?

The verdict has obviously trigger Justthecrap.  

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:43 am

The verdict has obviously trigger Justthecrap.

Nope just want people to know you just can't pull this **** without certain steps being made that you seem to be ignorant of. 

Trying Trying educate here. 


What are you doing?


 

I guess right wing news doesn't tell these Republicans the steps the F.B.I. have to go through to pull this off.

Wonder how many Trump appointed judges were in connection with this raid.

I'm betting a few.

Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:45 am

Nope just want people to know you just can't pull this **** without certain steps being made that you seem to be ignorant of. 

Trying Trying educate here. 

What are you doing?

The FBI pulls **** all the time...they've done this kind of thing dating all the way back to when the FBI was founded.  

Now tell the forum what "not guilty" means.   TIA

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:53 am

The FBI pulls **** all the time...they've done this kind of thing dating all the way back to when the FBI was founded.  

Now tell the forum what "not guilty" means.   TIA

Who were the judges that approved this raid?

roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:53 am

The FBI pulls **** all the time...they've done this kind of thing dating all the way back to when the FBI was founded.  

Now tell the forum what "not guilty" means.   TIA

Was a trump appointed judge in the loop. 

Im bettIng they were. 
 

Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jan 2023, 6:54 am

Who were the judges that approved this raid?

What were the criteria the FBI used to get the warrant in the first place?  


Then you can explain to the forum what "not guilty" means.