Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Was a trump appointed judge in the loop.
Im bettIng they were.
Who was the judges that approved this raid.
The man was found not guilty of violating the Face Act.Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 6:59 am » wrote: ↑ Who was the judges that approved this raid.
And yes it matters.
So you are not interested in the process.roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 7:11 am » wrote: ↑ The man was found not guilty of violating the Face Act.
"Mark Houck is NOT GUILTY! Praise God!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iOjDAz5Fl3Q
Another failed narrative on yer part. You don't care that he was found not guilty.Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ So you are not interested in the process.
You said the process doesn't matter.
You don't care about the process you just want to claim corruption without knowing the facts.
OK at least you are honest you don't care.
You already told us you don't care about the process.roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Another failed narrative on yer part. You don't care that he was found not guilty.
"Jury finds man not guilty in encounter with Planned Parenthood volunteer"
https://www.wfmz.com/news/area/southeas ... 859f9.html
Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑ You already told us you don't care about the process.
You just want the corruption without knowing the process to take ahold.
You already told us you don't care about the process that came to this decision.
And what judge approved it.
And why.
Ypu don't care about the what in this equation.
You just want to claim fraud with no proof.
We already saw this song and dance in 2020
Ypu trumpers need to change up your game.
Everybody with a brain can see right through this ****.
Well you already claimed you did care about process.Huey » 31 Jan 2023, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ You tell me. Apparently you know more than the justice system.
They weren't "looking" for anything.
RedheadedStranger » 31 Jan 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ They weren't "looking" for anything.
The Biden Admin had Garland send his goons in to Houck'd home to send a message to the pro-life right that dissenters will not be tolerated.
Sounds pretty "democratic" eh?
Exactly
Seeing how the PROCESS is what matters to you, here's PROCESS that you seem to NOT want to talk about.Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ So you are not interested in the process.
You said the process doesn't matter.
You don't care about the process you just want to claim corruption without knowing the facts.
OK at least you are honest you don't care.
Remember Justthe"doofus" said the FBI must follow proper procedures.RedheadedStranger » 31 Jan 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ They weren't "looking" for anything.
The Biden Admin had Garland send his goons in to Houck's home to send a message to the pro-life right that dissenters will not be tolerated.
Sounds pretty "democratic" eh?
roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ Remember Justthe"doofus" said the FBI must follow proper procedures.
Check this out...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wI3UFA3KTHc
Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑ and you told all of us I doesn't matter who was all in the process of this raid.
Oh they scared the children.roadkill » 31 Jan 2023, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑ Why was there a raid? The FBI knew Houck was at home and wasn't a threat. They could have sent one agent to his house and brought him in for questioning.
He did not violate the Face Act and he was found "not guilty".
I'm sure that's what the children took from the experience.Justthetruth » 31 Jan 2023, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Oh they scared the children.
Nope.
It taught these chdren to not break federal laws or you might cry a little.