Keep running.roadkill » 02 Oct 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑ Maybe you want my sources so you can subscribe to the truth and change yer life for the better.
Surprise surprise surprise! Well not really.roadkill » 25 Sep 2022, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ "Houck’s wife, Ryan-Marie, said that around 25 to 30 fully-armored FBI agents stormed their property early Friday morning, aiming their rifles as the children screamed in horror."
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022 ... ren-watch/
Pastafarian » 02 Oct 2022, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Surprise surprise surprise! Well not really.
.Your link is lying about the encounter.
https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news ... milys-home
Ya, your side lies.
You post links about FBI swat team raids that never happened as your links claim.
Pastafarian » 02 Oct 2022, 12:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You post links about FBI swat team raids that never happened as your links claim.
Eat that ****, ****.
The response to crack was far less insulting than the reaction to opioids. Crack addiction was seen as at least partially the responsibility of the addict. They had agency, they had control over their actions and were thus held accountable. Opioid epidemic was blamed on the manufacturer, the doctors, and everyone but the addict. The same addict that deliberately ground up a slow dissolving tablet, placed it in a spoon, melted it down and injected it. Those actions are not mentioned in the dosage instructions on any of these products yet somehow the manufacturer is liable.Pastafarian » 02 Oct 2022, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ And when exactly were the gays tolerated? Like you claim.
You did not mention race until now.
Few listened to racial grievances, you mean. There were grievances but nobody cared about the incarcerated crack addicts. At least today’s opioid crisis among white people aren’t landing y’all in prison.
Hmmm....
that’s right, avoid the question about when gays were tolerated.Neo » 02 Oct 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ The response to crack was far less insulting than the reaction to opioids. Crack addiction was seen as at least partially the responsibility of the addict. They had agency, they had control over their actions and were thus held accountable. Opioid epidemic was blamed on the manufacturer, the doctors, and everyone but the addict. The same addict that deliberately ground up a slow dissolving tablet, placed it in a spoon, melted it down and injected it. Those actions are not mentioned in the dosage instructions on any of these products yet somehow the manufacturer is liable.
Tolerance of *** dates back to biblical times, angel rapists of Sodom come to mind. Rome and Greece celebrated pederasty, parents of young citizens dreamed of finding a teacher that would school their child in ways both secular and sexual. They have faced oppression but not at any remarkable levels compared to any other disadvantaged minority. Today they are worshipped, their every queer notion foisted on the public as law demanding acceptance, tolerance, and celebration.Pastafarian » 03 Oct 2022, 6:20 am » wrote: ↑ that’s right, avoid the question about when gays were tolerated.
Deflect, know nothing.
In America, weakness.Neo » 03 Oct 2022, 7:07 am » wrote: ↑ Tolerance of *** dates back to biblical times, angel rapists of Sodom come to mind. Rome and Greece celebrated pederasty, parents of young citizens dreamed of finding a teacher that would school their child in ways both secular and sexual. They have faced oppression but not at any remarkable levels compared to any other disadvantaged minority. Today they are worshipped, their every queer notion foisted on the public as law demanding acceptance, tolerance, and celebration.
^^^^Excusing the racism like he always does.Neo » 02 Oct 2022, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ The response to crack was far less insulting than the reaction to opioids. Crack addiction was seen as at least partially the responsibility of the addict. They had agency, they had control over their actions and were thus held accountable. Opioid epidemic was blamed on the manufacturer, the doctors, and everyone but the addict. The same addict that deliberately ground up a slow dissolving tablet, placed it in a spoon, melted it down and injected it. Those actions are not mentioned in the dosage instructions on any of these products yet somehow the manufacturer is liable.
You asked when *** had been accepted so I guess you concede that it's always been widely accepted by most human populations throughout history. Even in puritanical societies it was accepted as long as it stayed in the closet.Pastafarian » 03 Oct 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ In America, weakness.
Having to hide yourself is extremely oppressive, depressive and degrading.
Rome destroys your whole narrative that a society becomes weakened bcuz of too much gay. At their height, Rome was a hedonistic and depraved society for the most part. Even at the height of Christendom in Constantinople, Romans were never as strong as they were prior.
Big pharmaceutical made a slow release drug to help millions get relief from chronic and ceaseless pain. It was a godsend to those having to take pills every few hours to stave off unimaginable suffering. Humans, being the corrupted apes we are, decided to crush these engineered slow release pills and freebase the powder. This is why we can't have nice things. The developers and companies are not responsible for deliberate misuse and re-engineering of their products.Pastafarian » 03 Oct 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ ^^^^Excusing the racism like he always does.
big pharma manufacturer=crack dealer.
wrong. at its height, romans killed homosexuals.Pastafarian » 03 Oct 2022, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ In America, weakness.
Having to hide yourself is extremely oppressive, depressive and degrading.
Rome destroys your whole narrative that a society becomes weakened bcuz of too much gay. At their height, Rome was a hedonistic and depraved society for the most part. Even at the height of Christendom in Constantinople, Romans were never as strong as they were prior.
Wrong, at its height, noble Romans and their military hierarchy were having sex with young boys.FOS » 03 Oct 2022, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ wrong. at its height, romans killed homosexuals.
during its decline, homosexuality was accepted.
an interesting perspective on this is the satires by Juvenal, who was noting the shift in elite behavior towards homosexuality around 200 AD. He thought it was disgusting.
https://www.poetryintranslation.com/PIT ... tires2.php
"I’d like to flee this place, go far beyond the Sarmatians and icyOcean, while those who pretend to the Curii’s virtue, but liveLike Bacchanals, have the gall to preach to us of morality.Lesson one: they’re ignorant, though their houses you’ll findFilled with plaster busts of Chrysippus; for the most perfectIs he who’s bought the most lifelike Aristotle, or Pittacus,And ordered an antique Cleanthes to watch over his bookcase.Put no trust in appearances; after all isn’t every street packedWith sad-looking perverts? How can you castigate sin, when youYourself are the most notorious of all the Socratic sodomite holes?