IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Everybody needs to understand that extremists and mainline Republican politicians, who in fear of losing a primary contest, have allowed themselves to become extremists, when faced with the case of a woman, impregnated by an act of rape, would give a rapist standing in civil court, and parental rights if either or both would be necessary to prevent that woman, pregnant by that same rapist, from having an abortion.
Republican politicians, and those who would support them in the voting booth are some sick ****.
I can see why you're afraid of rape: You are a ****.IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Everybody needs to understand that extremists and mainline Republican politicians, who in fear of losing a primary contest, have allowed themselves to become extremists, when faced with the case of a woman, impregnated by an act of rape, would give a rapist standing in civil court, and parental rights if either or both would be necessary to prevent that woman, pregnant by that same rapist, from having an abortion.
Republican politicians, and those who would support them in the voting booth are some sick ****.
The resurrection sounds far fetched to me.GHETTOBLASTER » 26 Sep 2022, 5:07 pm » wrote: ↑ I am going to try to sort out what you are claiming here.
A woman was impregnated by a Rapist.
"Extremist Republicans" gave the Rapist Parental rights.
By giving the Rapist parental rights the Rapist can prevent the woman from having the abortion..
Sounds kind of "far fetched" .
Especially in prison.
The penalty for lots of things should be death. But as long as we have a competitive criminal system, where wealth and winning, and not justice determines outcomes, nobody should be executed by the state.
Yeah so roadrash...besides reminding us that there are assholes in this country, something that we all have known for a long time, what's your **** point?
If this country is not legitimate enough to have a monopoly of force, then execute the politicians.IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The penalty for lots of things should be death. But as long as we have a competitive criminal system, where wealth and winning, and not justice determines outcomes, nobody should be executed by the state.
That also goes for law enforcement. Twenty five percent of the people who had their guilty verdicts reversed through the presentation of DNA evidence by The Innocence Project had confessed to a crime they could not have committed, during vicious coercive interrogation by cops.
IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 6:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah so roadrash...besides reminding us that there are assholes in this country, something that we all have known for a long time, what's your **** point?
Prison is a bad place. Not because it's filled with criminals. Because it's filled with stupid, bad criminals who got caught. Want to avoid I it getting raped in prison? Straighten up and fly right, don't get sent to prison.
Agreed. It's probably as good or better deterrent than capital punishment.IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 6:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Prison is a bad place. Not because it's filled with criminals. Because it's filled with stupid, bad criminals who got caught. Want to avoid I it getting raped in prison? Straighten up and fly right, don't get sent to prison.
Define woman, or shut the **** up about them.IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Everybody needs to understand that extremists and mainline Republican politicians, who in fear of losing a primary contest, have allowed themselves to become extremists, when faced with the case of a woman, impregnated by an act of rape, would give a rapist standing in civil court, and parental rights if either or both would be necessary to prevent that woman,
IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 6:04 pm » wrote: ↑ The resurrection sounds far fetched to me.
Man who raped 12-year-old awarded joint custody of her child
Rapists have already been awarded full parental rights and joint custody. Pretty **** ridiculous, biological parents rights superceding everything else is ****. If the biological father of a child of rape can win custody, the biological father has standing in court to object to his potential offspring being aborted. What I'm saying is, you assholes are extremists, and if there's any possible way for you **** wankers to interfere with a woman seeking an abortion, you assholes will use it, and that includes backing a rapist in a custody hearing.
You sound far fetched.
And by the way...why do you trust the Innocence Project? Since you seem to be aware that institutions can be corrupt...why no skepticism around the Innocence project?IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ The penalty for lots of things should be death. But as long as we have a competitive criminal system, where wealth and winning, and not justice determines outcomes, nobody should be executed by the state.
That also goes for law enforcement. Twenty five percent of the people who had their guilty verdicts reversed through the presentation of DNA evidence by The Innocence Project had confessed to a crime they could not have committed, during vicious coercive interrogation by cops.
Rape baby didn't do anything to deserve being murdered. Progressives turning objectively innocent parties into victimizers. Same playbook, might wanna get a new one. Ever met a rape baby? I have and she was adamantly pro life. As was her mother.IkeBana » 26 Sep 2022, 3:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Everybody needs to understand that extremists and mainline Republican politicians, who in fear of losing a primary contest, have allowed themselves to become extremists, when faced with the case of a woman, impregnated by an act of rape, would give a rapist standing in civil court, and parental rights if either or both would be necessary to prevent that woman, pregnant by that same rapist, from having an abortion. Hu
Republican politicians, and those who would support them in the voting booth are some sick ****.