You are a **** idiot, BlaVe.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ Coozie,
This isn't about me.
Nod, *******.
Don't presume to opine on January 6. You have chosen to stay ignorant of the facts.
It's not about a vibe.
Cedar » 03 Oct 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ It was the 5th and 6th but if it was only the 5th, what he did on the 5th was a violation of federal law, but you seem to gloss right over that point. 2 years later, no arrest has been made for the pipe bombs and oddly enough the FBI hasn’t released the video that would best show the perpetrators face. There are a lot of unanswered questions that your sham committee isn’t asking.
Specifically?what he did on the 5th was a violation of federal law,
According to whom?2 years later, no arrest has been made for the pipe bombs and oddly enough the FBI hasn’t released the video that would best show the perpetrators face.
Read the OP again.DeezerShoove » 03 Oct 2022, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ You are a **** idiot, BlaVe.
^^^This is how you further a conversation, right? You commentary is welcomed.
MJ is a highly regarded publication.
Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2022, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ MJ is a highly regarded publication.
Breitbart....not so much.
No....nationally..roadkill » 03 Oct 2022, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ I admit MJ was a highly regarded column in the Neander Valley Gazette.
Cedar » 03 Oct 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ It was the 5th and 6th but if it was only the 5th, what he did on the 5th was a violation of federal law, but you seem to gloss right over that point. 2 years later, no arrest has been made for the pipe bombs and oddly enough the FBI hasn’t released the video that would best show the perpetrators face. There are a lot of unanswered questions that your sham committee isn’t asking.
Specifically 18 U.S. Code § 2383.
Cedar » 03 Oct 2022, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Specifically 18 U.S. Code § 2383.
According to the camera footage they did release.there were two security cameras but at the time the FBI says the bombs were planted at the DNC they only release footage from one camera that was obscured by a bush. If they’re looking for the publics help in identifying the perpetrator why haven’t they release the shot from the camera that wasn’t obscured by the bush. Not to mention the Secret Service cleared this area after the bombs were supposedly planted, yet didn’t find the bombs at that time.
How is he implicated under this code?Specifically 18 U.S. Code § 2383
I asked for your source.According to the camera footage they did release.there were
You’re a useful idiot. Poor Ray Epps.IkeBana » 03 Oct 2022, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ A Trump Backer’s Downfall as the Target of a Jan. 6 Conspiracy Theory
Massie is a lying cocksucker, and has been one for his entire 10 years in the US House.
Why not?roadkill » 03 Oct 2022, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Cool...if you can read you can research Ray Epps...just don't use google.
MJ is a leftist lunatic rag.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2022, 7:31 am » wrote: ↑ MJ is a highly regarded publication.
Breitbart....not so much.
No, you're a recidivist moron.
Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2022, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑ Why not?
The first few pages are riddled with **** from epoch and some toilet paper called "Revolver News"..
How the **** would you know.
I just told you what I found, **** moron.
What does “go into the Capitol tomorrow” mean to you? Insurrection right? Can’t have your cake and eat it too. Ray Epps was inciting insurrection on J5, a violation of federal law.Blackvegetable » 03 Oct 2022, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ How is he implicated under this code?
I asked for your source.