Liberal Forum

Zeets2 » 13 Oct 2022, 5:59 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2022, 5:59 pm

Yeah, most likely because it's ****!  The District of Colombia HAS IT'S OWN NATIONAL GUARD!  So why would Pelosi need to go outside of her own jurisdiction?

And before you make a fool of yourself and deny that Trump actually offered the additional security NG troops as he claimed, here is the
corroboration from Army General Kellogg who was present when the request was made:

Here's his tweet citing the date of Trump's request was on Jan. 3rd, 2021.
Keith Kellogg @generalkellogg

To be clear on 6 Jan/NG. Pg 199 of my book, "On 3 Jan the President asked the Def Dept to deploy NG troops" into DC for J6 contingencies. OK for J6 Cmte to publicly release my full sworn testimony. Release Army Guard and DC Mayor J6 testimonies as well. Would be illuminating.

Then where the **** were they on Jan6th?  Where was the National Guard?
 

Nrasobphobia » 14 Oct 2022, 4:10 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 4:10 am

^^coward

Says the guy who has no address. I don't make threats nor do I respond by making threats at people who threaten ME.  I'll let YOU figure out why, CHUMP..
 
 
 

Nrasobphobia » 14 Oct 2022, 4:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 4:34 am

**** OFF BITCH COWARD
 

RIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGHT.      
 

ScottMon » 13 Oct 2022, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Oct 2022, 9:25 pm

Then where the **** were they on Jan6?

DUH!  So now you AGREE PELOSI should have been dragged before your phony 'select committee' and TESTIFY UNDER OATH WHY SHE REPEATEDLY REFUSED THE 10,000 National Guard troops TRUMP HAD ALREADY APPROVED?

10,000 Reasons Pelosi Is to Blame for Security Failures on Jan 6
Congressman Jody Hice | 6/9/22

Why did Pelosi fail to protect the Capitol while Trump, on Jan 4, requested 10,000 National Guard to provide security to the Capitol on Jan 6? The Left would very much like you to ignore this question. Its answer fundamentally undermines the Jan 6 Partisan Witch-hunt Committee’s highly-crafted and theatrically-based storyline about Trump’s involvement in the events that day—a theory that was completely rejected by an FBI investigation. If you were planning on “inciting an insurrection,” “trying to overthrow the Republic,” or “subverting the democratic process,” you wouldn’t have asked for 10,000 National Guard troops to protect the institution you were trying to overthrow!

Pelosi’s failures on Jan 6 exposed the Capitol’s vulnerabilities during the certification (and constitutionally-valid objection process) of the 2020 election – one that has been used by Democrats for years. Now she’s blaming Trump for her egregious incompetence and dragging the country along with her through dramatic nationally-televised smokescreen hearings. Pelosi’s blunders were systemic. A secret analysis by the Capitol Police identified “53 areas of failure” in Capitol security under Pelosi’s management.

 
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 7:55 am

DUH!  So now you AGREE PELOSI should have been dragged before your phony 'select committee' and TESTIFY UNDER OATH WHY SHE REPEATEDLY REFUSED THE 10,000 National Guard troops TRUMP HAD ALREADY APPROVED?

Trump didn't need Pelosi's permission, *******.  He was the president.  
 

ScottMon » 14 Oct 2022, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 7:58 am

Trump didn't need Pelosi's permission, *******.  He was the president.

YOU'RE the *******, jerkoff!  
Just educate your stupid self before climbing out on that weak limb you love so much!:

Trump Authorized National Guard for Jan. 6 but Congress, DC Didn’t Request Its Use, Former Aide Says

Under the law, a president can’t order domestic deployment of Guard; local officials must request it
By Joseph Hanneman, July 25, 2022

Continued...
 
 
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 8:48 am

YOU'RE the *******, jerkoff!  
Just educate your stupid self before climbing out on that weak limb you love so much!:

Continued...

...Continued

A claim by the vice chair of the House Jan. 6 Select Committee that President Trump didn’t order the use of National Guard troops in the District of Columbia on Jan. 6, 2021, is true because that would have been a violation of the law, former Pentagon chief of staff Kash Patel says. Rep. Liz Cheney told Fox News’ Bret Baier that Trump “never issued any order to deploy the National Guard to protect the Capitol.”Patel said that Trump authorized up to 20,000 National Guard troops for use in D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, but the use of those troops was later rejected by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and the US Capitol Police. Under the law, the president can’t order the deployment of the military for use inside the United States, Patel said. “She knows the truth— [Trump] authorized the National Guard days before Jan. 6, and Pelosi and Bowser rejected it. Cheney knows it’s unconstitutional for any president to ever order the military to deploy domestically. He may only authorize their use, then there must be a request.

Continued...


 
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 8:53 am

Continued

Continued

“By her own quote, she has cleared Trump of the very thing she has accused him of from Day 1—an insurrection,” Patel said. “So, yes, Trump never made that illegal order. He followed the law.” Trump authorized as many as 20,000 Guard troops for use on Jan 6,  days earlier. The offer of troops was rejected by Bowser and House Speaker Pelosi, he said. Under the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act, the US military can’t be used domestically for enforcing laws or keeping order. “The Supreme Court said two things must happen,” said Patel, “One: the President of the US has to authorize, not order, the use of the National Guard. DC Mayor Muriel Bowser rejected Trump’s offer of NG troops on Jan 6 in this letter a day before. ‘Once that happens, step two has to happen before they can be deployed,” he said, “and that is a request from the head of state, the governor, or in this case, Mayor Bowser because it’s Washington, D.C. Or federal law enforcement needs to request the National Guard to be deployed. “If those two things don’t happen, then any issuance of the National Guard would be literally unconstitutional.”

https://drrichswier.com/2022/07/28/trum ... aide-says/

Get it now?  NO PRESIDENT can unilaterally deploy the National Guard for law enforcement or for keeping order UNDER FEDERAL LAW!!!
 
 Care to explain WHY BOTH Pelosi AND Bowser REJECTED THE SECURITY TROOPS THAT WERE AUTHORIZED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP or WHY  NEITHER ONE WAS CALLED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH AT YOUR PHONY "COMMITTEE HEARING"?

Awaiting explanations from you or from your fellow ignorant Eggplant!

 
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 9:04 am

Continued

Get it now?  NO PRESIDENT can unilaterally deploy the National Guard for law enforcement or for keeping order UNDER FEDERAL LAW!!!
 
 Care to explain WHY BOTH Pelosi AND Bowser REJECTED THE SECURITY TROOPS THAT WERE AUTHORIZED BY PRESIDENT TRUMP or WHY  NEITHER ONE WAS CALLED TO TESTIFY UNDER OATH AT YOUR PHONY "COMMITTEE HEARING"?

Awaiting explanations from you or from your fellow ignorant Eggplant!

Here's the actual letter signed by Bowser that exposed the lies of both your corrupt committee AND YOU!:


 
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 8:48 am

YOU'RE the *******, jerkoff!  
Just educate your stupid self before climbing out on that weak limb you love so much!:

Continued...

Fake news.  
Who Controls the National Guard? - FindLaw
 

ScottMon » 14 Oct 2022, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 10:13 am

Fake news.  
Who Controls the National Guard? - FindLaw

So, show me WHERE it states that the President MUST override the decision when his authorization for National Guard security troops ARE REJECTED by the local authorities!  Once his offer is REJECTED by the local authorities, PELOSI AND BOWSER ARE ACCEPTING FULL RESPONSIBILITY ONTO THEMSELVES FOR THE ENSUING RIOT!

Oh, but THAT wouldn't be useful to Democrats who are still searching desperately to find a way to prevent Trump from kicking Democrat asses in 2024, would it?

PELOSI is in charge of security for the US Capitol!  It is HER RESPONSIBILITY!  Are you going to try to deny that?
How come you can't provide a single reason WHY she rejected Trump's offer?
Or why hasn't SHE been called in your partisan kangaroo court to explain her decision AND WHY SHE CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO ANSWER?
 

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 10:45 am

So, show me WHERE it states that the President MUST override the decision when his authorization for National Guard security troops ARE REJECTED by the local authorities!  Once his offer is REJECTED by the local authorities, PELOSI AND BOWSER ARE ACCEPTING FULL RESPONSIBILITY ONTO THEMSELVES FOR THE ENSUING RIOT!

Oh, but THAT wouldn't be useful to Democrats who are still searching desperately to find a way to prevent Trump from kicking Democrat asses in 2024, would it?

PELOSI is in charge of security for the US Capitol!  It is HER RESPONSIBILITY!  Are you going to try to deny that?
How come you can't provide a single reason WHY she rejected Trump's offer?
Or why hasn't SHE been called in your partisan kangaroo court to explain her decision AND WHY SHE CAN'T BE BOTHERED TO ANSWER?

Seriously, You think Trump would answer to Pelosi on anything?
 

ScottMon » 14 Oct 2022, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 2:55 pm

Seriously, You think Trump would answer to Pelosi on anything?

What makes you think he would EVER be in a position to have to answer ANYTHING to bitch Pelosi?  SHE'S not on the committee, and she'll likely retire once she loses the House and her position as Speaker.  But the Congressmen who subpoena Hillary will have PLENTY of questions for her, and she'll probably show up drunk anyway!
And that will expose their partisan witch hunt for the kangaroo court it is and has been, which will be sufficient to springboard Trump into a commanding lead for the 2024 nomination, which, of course, is your worst nightmare!
 

Yeah, that did it. That one incident clearly indicates the overall behavior of millions of Trump supporters.   
 Also, I can't understand the **** illegal alien in the caption, secondly, these guys below make your example look pathetic EVERY day, NEARLY as pathetic as what your thread is supposed to imply. Looooooser!   Gawwwdangit, you're a very stupid person!


 

Run away from me or dance, Kitty Kat. Choose one or both of your only weapons.

Nrasobphobia » 14 Oct 2022, 4:41 am » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 4:41 am

NO PG TO HIDE IN          
****** BITCH COWARD      

 

LMAO. Really? Dude, you sound just like all the other bitchy SNOWFLAKES here WHINING because they can't trash the FACTS I post nor come up with a decent rebuttal.

They all sound like impotent little dweebs crying "nanny nanny boo boo." GROW THE **** UP  
 

Nrasobphobia » 15 Oct 2022, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2022, 6:48 am

really
 

Let me ease your pain.

Nrasobphobia » 15 Oct 2022, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

15 Oct 2022, 7:09 am

what is it? I can't see it.
Why are the pictures you post so small ?   
               

Yuk...BSee is offering you his prescription.   

Zeets2 » 14 Oct 2022, 5:41 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Oct 2022, 5:41 pm

What makes you think he would EVER be in a position to have to answer ANYTHING to bitch Pelosi?  SHE'S not on the committee, and she'll likely retire once she loses the House and her position as Speaker.  But the Congressmen who subpoena Hillary will have PLENTY of questions for her, and she'll probably show up drunk anyway!
And that will expose their partisan witch hunt for the kangaroo court it is and has been, which will be sufficient to springboard Trump into a commanding lead for the 2024 nomination, which, of course, is your worst nightmare!

Funny how in your universe everyone is to blame except Trump.  I recommend deprogramming.
 

ScottMon » 11 Oct 2022, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Oct 2022, 9:39 pm

No, Not really.  They assaulted the young lady with a beer and then ran off like cowards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p11kvIM6zfM

Darn...they missed her.   lol


Then she drinks it.