Fancy talk. As always, he can't use perfectly eloquent words in a sentence without coming across like a moron.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑How does that make @Vegas not a moron?Huey » 19 Jan 2023, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ You have a thread on Santos. You can ask me there, NoStands. Plus, if you look hard enough you will find my opinion of him. Try using the search word "scumbag".
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑Wouldn't that make @Vegas a moron?Huey » 19 Jan 2023, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑ I'll take that bet......More Republicans call for George Santos to resign over lies and fabrications
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... -rcna65550
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 9:08 am » wrote: ↑@VegasFJB » 19 Jan 2023, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑ Why are you asking questions like that if I didn't mention Trump?
This is the game I am not playing.
I asked a simple question, You are going off topic.
Post the topic.
**** idiot.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑No falls, and no curbstompings.Huey » 19 Jan 2023, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑ Someone is butthurt…was it from falling down the mountain or the numerous curbstompings?
You must have me confused with someone else.
Now, Buzzy, go ahead and demonstrate that @Vegas is NOT a moron.
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑When does that begin?RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2023, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑ That question has already been asked and answered dumb ***.
Try harder.
Are you going to snatch the baton from @Vegas and run a leg of the 4 x Moron relay?
Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑No, it hasn't.Vegas » 18 Jan 2023, 7:33 pm » wrote: ↑ The Clinton foundation has stolen millions. But that's ok, of course.
You're lying.
He's something else for sure.Vegas » 19 Jan 2023, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑
![]()
I woke up to 20 notifications. About 15 were form Veghead. I own this little bitch. Rent free in his head 24 hours a day.
RedheadedStranger » 19 Jan 2023, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ He's something else for sure.
He could definitely be a case study for a psych student that needed a research subject to write a paper on.
![]()
Why hasn't vegas given this dick sucker five greenies?Blackvegetable » 19 Jan 2023, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ tiny,
you want to move from one thread to another, entirely at random.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't.
Don't forget to spend the rest of your life stalking.
So, no response about my definition compared to yours, huh?Blackvegetable » 25 Jan 2026, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't.
Don't forget to spend the rest of your life stalking.
Grass Roots, "Let's live for today." because tomorrow never arrives calling each next planetary rotation a separate day of the week in the life of equally adapting in the moment here..
Your reality to the letter of who you say you became after birth. You won't discuss all you were physically since a fertilized cell.Johnny You » 26 Jan 2026, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ Deck the Halls with Artificials... Troll La la la la la lah hah hah hah..
they? here you are chanting the same hyperbole.Johnny You » 26 Jan 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Well they say it's all a simulation so....
Trump calling for stricter gun controls this morning is a return to irregular programming... Details at Civil War 2.0 O'Clock.