It's a CONSENSUS, yours is an opinion.Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that sure is an objective opinion!
Retards like you LOVE to swallow left-wing lies and **** like your absurd references that claim Trump's only agenda was to make money, while the fact is that Trump LOST over a billion dollars from his personal wealth while he was in office.
Can Obama, Bubba Clinton, Pelosi, or any other liberal politician you love so much make that same claim?
No hurry, I'll wait while you find one, you gullible dickhead!
Subjectively targeting anyone not compromising away their own time to keep relative time logistics only truths recognized in laws governing social behavior forward.Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, that sure is an objective opinion!
Retards like you LOVE to swallow left-wing lies and **** like your absurd references that claim Trump's only agenda was to make money, while the fact is that Trump LOST over a billion dollars from his personal wealth while he was in office.
Can Obama, Bubba Clinton, Pelosi, or any other liberal politician you love so much make that same claim?
No hurry, I'll wait while you find one, you gullible dickhead!
To Democrats, the following is "Prosperity"
****, you lying scumbag! There isn't a single bit of "consensus" by ANYONE in your link! It's a COMPLETE opinion piece coming from a far-left worthless magazine like The Atlantic!
Here's ANOTHER reference to their actual consensus, and reported on by the left-wing MSN who reluctantly admit it:Biden in 'worst president ever' territory
by Paul Bedard Washington Examiner February 02, 2022
Yup. President Joe Biden has finally gone there. Battered by horrible approval ratings and just today whacked in a Gallup survey showing that voter satisfaction has hit a “gloomy” new low, Biden in just a year is being kicked to the side of the road by voters. Or, as Rasmussen Reports said in its latest analysis, “Most voters think President Joe Biden is one of the worst ever to hold the office, and rank him below his two immediate predecessors in the White House.”In three questions, Rasmussen asked voters about Biden, former President Donald Trump, and former President Barack Obama. They were asked if each will be remembered as the best, worst, or just average.Obama:Trump:
- 34% said one of the best ever.
- 33% said one of the worst ever.
- 30% said about average.
Biden:
- 41% best ever.
- 43% worst ever.
- 12% about average.
- 15% best.
- 54% worst.
- 25% average.
See the difference between the OPINION of a left-wing activist and an actual poll taken of Americans by a highly reputable source?54% of Americans think Biden will be rated among the worst presidents
Nikki Schwab, Senior U.S. Political Reporter Feb 2
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... ar-AATpQ70
C-SPAN, Siena, APSA....Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ ****, you lying scumbag! There isn't a single bit of "consensus" by ANYONE in your link! It's a COMPLETE opinion piece coming from a far-left worthless magazine like The Atlantic!
Want to see what a "consensus" actually looks like? Here is the CONSENSUS of VOTERS in an actual poll:
Here's ANOTHER reference to their actual consensus, and reported on by the left-wing MSN who reluctantly admit it:
See the difference between the OPINION of a left-wing activist and an actual poll taken of Americans by a highly reputable source?
YOUR link of an opinion comes from a failing magazine on the brink of bankruptcy while Rasmussen is one of the most accurate poll-taking researchers in the business.
Tell us you're not really too dumb to grasp that reality, if you've got any balls!
Well, I don't want to defend BV but he is right in a way... the TDS consensus is that Trump is the worst president evuh...Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ ****, you lying scumbag! There isn't a single bit of "consensus" by ANYONE in your link! It's a COMPLETE opinion piece coming from a far-left worthless magazine like The Atlantic!
Want to see what a "consensus" actually looks like? Here is the CONSENSUS of VOTERS in an actual poll:
Here's ANOTHER reference to their actual consensus, and reported on by the left-wing MSN who reluctantly admit it:
See the difference between the OPINION of a left-wing activist and an actual poll taken of Americans by a highly reputable source?
YOUR link of an opinion comes from a failing magazine on the brink of bankruptcy while Rasmussen is one of the most accurate poll-taking researchers in the business.
Tell us you're not really too dumb to grasp that reality, if you've got any balls!

MORE ****!Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2022, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ C-SPAN, Siena, APSA....
all place Grifty at or right next to last.
I don't care what stupid people think.
Can you show me a poll from 2022 that includes Biden and is not simply an opinion piece of phony left-wing "historians"?Jantje_Smit » 19 Oct 2022, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I don't want to defend BV but he is right in a way... the TDS consensus is that Trump is the worst president evuh...
The forum consensus is that BV is a dickhead...
![]()
I can't show you that... I can show you why though... they're too scared to do a credible poll that includes braindead..Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ Can you show me a poll from 2022 that includes Biden and is not simply an opinion piece of phony left-wing "historians"?
If there is one, I simply haven't seen it.
Coming from the idiot who can't think for himself. Post more links to talk for you...
Post Biden's rank in the Siena survey.Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑ MORE ****!
None of those polls include Biden in them, do they, you lying scumbag?
Want to prove you're not?
Just show us popularity polls that include the diaper-wearing demented asshole YOU voted for!
Or won't that buttress your continued lies?
Do your own homework, dickhead!
It isn't.Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Do your own homework, dickhead!
It's not like a poll from the NY Times Siena poll isn't always a left-wing hatchet job for them to attack Trump with, so it's as worthless as you are!
Don't try to tell me it isn't completely biased, when the NY Times/Siena poll of 1399 registered voters contained an oversampling of 522 who were Hispanics, which is more than DOUBLE the voter percentage of Hispanic registered voters in the country.
From the massive arsenal of a debate forum’s “Giant Slayer” comes:Vegas » 18 Oct 2022, 11:42 am » wrote: ↑ No thoughts, etc...and that last **** is level 0. **** that ****.
Spam.
Not that one, Moron...Zeets2 » 19 Oct 2022, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't try to tell me it isn't completely biased, when the NY Times/Siena poll of 1399 registered voters contained an oversampling of 522 who were Hispanics, which is more than DOUBLE the voter percentage of Hispanic registered voters in the country.
When liberals do that, THEIR POLLS ARE WORTHLESS, except to gullible morons like you who care nothing about the reality, as long as your idols think they can get away with creating phony stats like that to get stupid Democrats to believe and tout them, no matter how ignorant they make you look!
You should call them up and thank them for making you such a chump!
Not that is was a very far stretch to begin with, of course!
Did you even look at the criteria for that poll, you fool?Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2022, 8:59 pm » wrote: ↑ Not that one, Moron...
https://scri.siena.edu/2022/06/22/american-presidents-greatest-and-worst/
There isn't a bit of that post which is true.Zeets2 » 20 Oct 2022, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ Did you even look at the criteria for that poll, you fool?
It involved a grand total of 141 participants, and gullible idiots like you think that is a true indication of anything, when you know damn well that such a small sample of respondents WHO SIENA PICKED TO SEND THE POLL, would be an indication of NOTHING, other that to make liberal dopes like you happy with the result they wanted.
And on top of that, they ONLY counted the first year of your diaper-boy!
Worthless. Just like you!
but figuratively, relatively there are contrived holes in the logic created by statistically averaging everything against any one specific event.Blackvegetable » 20 Oct 2022, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑ There isn't a bit of that post which is true.
Literally, not one bit....
But it's not just "141 participants"Nrasobphobia » 20 Oct 2022, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑ "The Siena College Research Institute (SCRI) Survey of U.S. Presidents is based on responses from 141 presidential scholars, historians and political scientists that responded via mail or web to an invitation to participate."