1. That's not a prediction. That's just an argument over semantics.Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2022, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. I said we weren't.....you idiots said we were.
2. Each of his 3 media efforts post 2020 has failed.
3. Acknowledged by Mitch McConnell.
Time for you to post evidence that you aren't a moron.
I am citing your own source, NItwit. Not someone…..Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2022, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny coward,
I was the one telling you we aren't, while you were citing Influencers telling you we are.
Now you are citing someone telling us it WILL happen.
Naturally, you will insist that this is one stand.
1. No it isn't, **** nitwit.Vegas » 29 Oct 2022, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. That's not a prediction. That's just an argument over semantics.
2. So? Again, that isn't a prediction. Your media fails incessantly. it can be expected.
3. Again, not impressive. You had a 50/50. Big **** deal.
Try again.
That dude wasn't my source, **** idiot.Huey » 29 Oct 2022, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ I am citing your own source, NItwit. Not someone…..
I did say the Atlanta Fed said we’re we’re in a recession:
viewtopic.php?p=2074903#p2074903
Speaking of haunting and all.
A recession traditionally, until Biden, has been defined as two consecutive quarters of negative growth.
Know, every time you bring this up your run to the NBER, BUT, even they claim they are not the arbiter of whether or not we are in a recession. They take a historical view afterwards to see if we were and how long it lasted.
That has been posted for you numerous times. If I have to repost it is another 6 months. Or until you learn to make your own case,
I’ll check back tomorrow. Dickless ****** strike thrus, diversions, questions, etc will result in another 6 months unless you learn to formulate a pin argument.
Capisce, Real life ******?
Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑ 1. No it isn't, **** nitwit.
2. Bloomberg and CNN have been in business a long time. Grifty can't get out of the gate.
3. That's not a 50/50, **** moron
You're calling Obama Grifty now? Surprised, but makes total sense to me - he is a bribe-taker. I only say that because the worst recession in US history, other than the Great Depression, was under Obama. Thank God Trump got us out of that hole.
Skans,Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ You're calling Obama Grifty now? Surprised, but makes total sense to me - he is a bribe-taker. I only say that because the worst recession in US history, other than the Great Depression, was under Obama. Thank God Trump got us out of that hole.
Well, I can read English and I can analyze a graph. But, you know something, graphs are meaningless unless you know from where the coordinates were derived.Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2022, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ Skans,
We know you aren't much good with numbers....can you read a graph?
Get doing whatever you want to call it.Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Well, I can read English and I can analyze a graph. But, you know something, graphs are meaningless unless you know from where the coordinates were derived.

Just looking at your GDP graph (doesn't say much about the economy), Trump had a steady increase in GDP during his entire presidency, except for a brief, sharp dip because of the pandemic. Biden rides Trump's coattails for the first part of 2021, but when he starts in with Biden policy - look what happens, it dips and flat lines. Yeah, BIDEN SUCKS!
Now focus for a minute.Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Just looking at your GDP graph (doesn't say much about the economy), Trump had a steady increase in GDP during his entire presidency, except for a brief, sharp dip because of the pandemic. Biden rides Trump's coattails for the first part of 2021, but when he starts in with Biden policy - look what happens, it dips and flat lines. Yeah, BIDEN SUCKS!
Look at your graph. The first "tell" that it is bogus is that it portends to go through September, 2022, but it clearly doesn't go past the 1st quarter of 2022! So, the Joe Biden recession is truncated from the graph.Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2022, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Now focus for a minute.
We were talking about the magnitudes of the Recessions, never mind your visions.
Please stop.Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Look at your graph. The first "tell" that it is bogus is that it portends to go through September, 2022, but it clearly doesn't go past the 1st quarter of 2022! So, the Joe Biden recession is truncated from the graph.
So, let's start with you explaining that bogus graph to us. It should show 8 months, but you can clearly see that it only shows 3 months. MEASURE THE DISTANCE of the x-axis between 2021 and 2022, and then from 2021 to the end of your graph, before you even think about responding.
Your graph is bogus. I pointed this out to you. I showed you where to look to see ON THE FACE OF THE GRAPH ALONE (nothing else needed) that this graph is bogus or has been intentionally tampered with. Address your dishonesty. Any further discussion of "Blackvegetable's Bogus Graph" is pointless until you explain this glaring "anomaly".Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2022, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Please stop.
The dip in 2020 is substantially deeper than the dumpster fire bequeathed by Scrub.
Nod.
There is, as of yet, no Biden recession.
Nod.
This is where you fall to your knees and hail my glorious demigodhood.Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ Your graph is bogus. I pointed this out to you. I showed you where to look to see ON THE FACE OF THE GRAPH ALONE (nothing else needed) that this graph is bogus or has been intentionally tampered with. Address your dishonesty. Any further discussion of "Blackvegetable's Bogus Graph" is pointless until you explain this glaring "anomaly".
Epic Fail! I busted you wide open on your fake-news graph. Next time, check your source before you put an obviously F-ed up graph up to support your claim. I busted you like the cherry on a little, chubby 18 year old virgin libtard angrily humping my cock.Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2022, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑ This is where you fall to your knees and hail my glorious demigodhood.
IdiotSkans,Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Epic Fail! I busted you wide open on your fake-news graph. Next time, check your source before you put an obviously F-ed up graph up to support your claim. I busted you like the cherry on a little, chubby 18 year old virgin libtard angrily humping my cock.
Your fake chart is fake news. It clams to be a chart through September 1, but actually only shows the 1st quarter - through March 31. What is obviously missing is the two back to back quarters where GDP stats showed we are in a recession. LOL! Nice try, but next time, know you are dealing with someone who has more than twice the IQ of Biden.Blackvegetable » 31 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ IdiotSkans,
Each line is current as of its last reporting date.
Skans,Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Your fake chart is fake news. It clams to be a chart through September 1, but actually only shows the 1st quarter - through March 31. What is obviously missing is the two back to back quarters where GDP stats showed we are in a recession. LOL! Nice try, but next time, know you are dealing with someone who has more than twice the IQ of Biden.
"The GDP estimate released today is based on source data that are incomplete or subject to furtherBlackvegetable » 27 Oct 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.cnbc.com/2022/10/27/us-gdp- ... itive.html
Perhaps their fear of the Blackvegetable is well founded...