Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 9:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Okay, Fox didn't tie it to Jan 6.
Get those *** a pulitzer - HURRY!
That sounds thin, my friend.Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Perhaps he likes to soak in a hot tub, warming his bones - while the phone is charging, talking on speaker phone. The location of the phone is a distraction. It's the old man's phone, he's a free white american - he can charge his **** phone in the attic, if that's his thing.
The issue is that crazed homeless junkies do not outfox the secret service - and the digs of the third in line to the prez are signed off on and monitored by the secret service.
Nowhere in the manual does it say, "When third-in-line is away from home, ignore the residence. Bomb-makers are people, too, with a family to feed. They cannot plant bombs while she's home, but they have dibbs on the place when it's empty, or when the only one home is the gay homosexual husband." No, sir. It does not say that. The reason that boy was in that house is that he was invited by the gay homosexual husband for queer purposes involving ***. Had he not been invited, he would not have been there. He came in through a DOOR, as a welcomed guest.
Nope...I don't think fox is perfect. But there are some differences. We're both going on what we've heard in the news and coming to our own conclusions that the news isn't telling us.Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 9:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Now we're getting toward synthesis.
It's MSNBC's JOB to protect pelosi. It's what we EXPECT.
The pretense that fox actually OPPOSES them is what I am reacting to - and you are reacting to my reaction.
You need to look at that. It's a problem for you.
Chris Wallace used to be a big shot there.Zeets2 » 30 Oct 2022, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I'll take their reporting over anything coming out of CNN or MSNBC any day.
If you think either of those two are better, you're as gullible as every leftist here! And I don't blame Fox for waiting until all the facts are in before reporting on it, rather then the wild speculating that goes on at CNN and MSNBC any day of the week. So feel free to swallow the most absurd lies coming from them that the attacker was a fan of far-RIGHT ideology when the guy's own wife (from prison) told investigators that her husband shared HER EXTREMELY LIBERAL VIEWS on politics and was NOT a Trump supporter.
I think which one of us is really the sucker will shortly be exposed.
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Chris Wallace used to be a big shot there.
btw
Fox is shy about being tough-sounding and jumping to conclusions.
CP is right about that at least in part. They'll wait until it's "safe".
The people that guard the place...roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 9:43 pm » wrote: ↑ That's logical...that's what I think Fox may be doing too. They're not jumping as high as CNN, etc.
It may simply be two *** got in a fight and a hammer was present...but there may have been another person involved who let the cops in the front door.
If so...who?
What they were actually guarding is none of your business.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 9:52 pm » wrote: ↑ If it was a clean cut case of nut job #1 breaking and entering the house then the guards were no more effective than the guards at J6.
Was it designed that way just like J6? Who knows.
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ What they were actually guarding is none of your business.
Probably never will be...
More commentary FWIW...DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Chris Wallace used to be a big shot there.
btw
Fox is shy about being tough-sounding and jumping to conclusions.
CP is right about that at least in part. They'll wait until it's "safe".
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 9:54 pm » wrote: ↑ What they were actually guarding is none of your business.
Probably never will be...
Once you're invited in, you belong there.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 9:59 pm » wrote: ↑ ? I assume they were guarding the house and anyone inside that belonged there. Did they simply miss the crazy man that seemed to have no problem entering a guarded house?
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 10:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Once you're invited in, you belong there.
This is CP's theory...
I think there's more to it. Nancy probably set it up.
Paul Pelosi has become a pariah. No big loss if he's killed off.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ If he was invited then yes, he belongs there. I just watched a video where a guy thinks we won't hear much more because they're covering up the relationship between Paul and the other guy. We'll just have to wait and see what they tell us or don't tell us.
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Paul Pelosi has become a pariah. No big loss if he's killed off.
Nancy has bigger fish to fry than having a husband-queer.
I'm just concerned that some illegal alien in his under panties can just as easily break into the WH an attack Pedo Joe with a hammer. I hope the powers that be are paying attention and post a security guard or something on the WH.DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Paul Pelosi has become a pariah. No big loss if he's killed off.
Nancy has bigger fish to fry than having a husband-queer.
DeezerShoove » 30 Oct 2022, 11:01 pm » wrote: ↑ Paul Pelosi has become a pariah. No big loss if he's killed off.
Nancy has bigger fish to fry than having a husband-queer.
It gets better all the time... a third person was there.. that sounds plausible, I don't think Nancy's husband could open the door for the police when he had his head bashed in with a hammer.. what happened to the security footage... and how come the gay nut with the hammer was in his underwear.. did he break in dressed like that.. they're trying to cover it up but it isn't working...Zeets2 » 30 Oct 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, there's no telling right now which one was the preferred "bottom boy", but what tells me that the cover-up is already in full swing is the police report stating that THERE WAS A THIRD PERSON in the home (at 3am, huh?) who actually ANSWERED THE DOOR FOR THE POLICE when they arrived.
So where is HIS statement as an eye witness to the crime? Right now, it's looking to me like they had all had a wild sex party in their underwear, probably where ALL THREE took turns pitching and catching, if you know what I mean!

Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 11:41 pm » wrote: ↑ There's no definitive proof that paul pelosi is queer. The guy he was paying to **** him is another matter. That guy is definitely queer.
No, just buried behind the wall of insanity, hidden away for the next ten years.