Liberal Forum

roadkill » 29 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm

We know they would do it if it was beneficial to them.

And we know they're already doing it now, trying to frame this nut as a right-wing extremist and Trump supporter when there is nothing to prove it OR to disprove that he was actually a far-LEFT extremist, according to the conversation with his wife who obviously knows him better than CNN and MSNBC.

It's their standard operating procedure, especially when they know that the truth can do them immeasurable harm in next week's election.
 

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 8:26 am

And we know they're already doing it now, trying to frame this nut as a right-wing extremist and Trump supporter when there is nothing to prove it OR to disprove that he was actually a far-LEFT extremist, according to the conversation with his wife who obviously knows him better than CNN and MSNBC.

It's their standard operating procedure, especially when they know that the truth can do them immeasurable harm in next week's election.

But it won't help...This Just In.  MSNBC is actually reporting news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zsJ4L5tC78
 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Oct 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2022, 11:44 am

The guy had been drugged and sexually assaulted by Paul Pelosi, and he wanted Nancy to rescue him.

The poor MK Ultra victim thought the Pelosis were his "friends."

SF police and media are constructing hasty cover for the Pelosis, after Paul got carried away during rough sex and took a hammer to his sex-slave. The 911 call and security footage are being withheld, pending manipulation.

 
 

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 8:26 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 8:26 am

And we know they're already doing it now, trying to frame this nut as a right-wing extremist and Trump supporter when there is nothing to prove it OR to disprove that he was actually a far-LEFT extremist, according to the conversation with his wife who obviously knows him better than CNN and MSNBC.

It's their standard operating procedure, especially when they know that the truth can do them immeasurable harm in next week's election.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUivmIsqhAY
 

roadkill » 31 Oct 2022, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 8:31 am

But it won't help...This Just In.  MSNBC is actually reporting news.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zsJ4L5tC78

My skepticism tells me that if they're admitting to an approval rating of 38% for Biden, it's probably at least a few points lower than that.  Likewise, his DISAPPROVAL rating is certainly much higher than 57%.  How can it possibly be that 43% of the country DO NOT disapprove of this demented scumbag?
 

Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 7:11 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Oct 2022, 7:11 pm

That's okay - I'm unaware they have a news side, so we're even, except for me being a lot smarter.
 

Who knows, maybe you're right.

But I've found through my experience that those people who are truly wise, don't find the overwhelming need to constantly proclaim how smart they are.  That's often a trait found in those who are the most insecure, a group in which you're likely a part of.
 

Get a load of this TRAITOR / GLOBALIST PUPPET ........https://youtu.be/mb40L-FPEZ8

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 9:39 am

My skepticism tells me that if they're admitting to an approval rating of 38% for Biden, it's probably at least a few points lower than that.  Likewise, his DISAPPROVAL rating is certainly much higher than 57%.  How can it possibly be that 43% of the country DO NOT disapprove of this demented scumbag?

You may be right...also, repubs are less likely to respond to pollsters.  

roadkill » 31 Oct 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 10:17 am

You may be right...also, repubs are less likely to respond to pollsters.

Additionally, I'm unconvinced as to the oversampling of Democrats that they always do in these polls run by the fake news media.

The other possibility, of course, is that they're attempting to encourage Democrat turnout by showing their audience (of mostly liberals) that Democrats are far behind and need to use such a poll to terrorize the most devout liberals into making sure their side turns out every voter they possibly can, since it's well documented that an off-year election never favors the incumbents.
 

This one should go in here too

 

roadkill » 31 Oct 2022, 6:01 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 6:01 am

Some on Fox have also asked the other questions.  BTW...the man IS fruitloop...so are Paul and Nancy.  Birds of a feather.

"Some."  

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 8:02 am

I'm a fox-fed fool and a midwit jaggov.You could have come right out with that and saved us both some trouble.

 

Cannonpointer » 31 Oct 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 11:17 am

"Some."

Are you insecure, or just out of chill pills? Or maybe you think yer the shaolin priest of .net?

You think others haven't considered the same things you have?

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 9:46 am

Who knows, maybe you're right.

But I've found through my experience that those people who are truly wise, don't find the overwhelming need to constantly proclaim how smart they are.  That's often a trait found in those who are the most insecure, a group in which you're likely a part of.

You sound a little butthurt, midwit. It's almost like someone told your stupid *** that the koolaid you drink leaves the same stains as the koolaid your equivalents on the left drink. 

But hey -ya got a bunch of greenies from nuckin futz - so you are not without adherents, fruity.

Zeets2 » 31 Oct 2022, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 10:32 am

Additionally, I'm unconvinced as to the oversampling of Democrats that they always do in these polls run by the fake news media.

The other possibility, of course, is that they're attempting to encourage Democrat turnout by showing their audience (of mostly liberals) that Democrats are far behind and need to use such a poll to terrorize the most devout liberals into making sure their side turns out every voter they possibly can, since it's well documented that an off-year election never favors the incumbents.

Any of that is possible.  I think we're in good position.

roadkill » 31 Oct 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 11:22 am

Are you insecure, or just out of chill pills? Or maybe you think yer the shaolin priest of .net?

You think others haven't considered the same things you have?

I'm simply pointing out that fox is a pile of **** - and it simply seems to be giving you piles.

Maybe you need to watch an episode or two of that thinly veiled closet case Hannity, until ya feel better?

Cannonpointer » 29 Oct 2022, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2022, 11:44 am

The guy had been drugged and sexually assaulted by Paul Pelosi, and he wanted Nancy to rescue him.

The poor MK Ultra victim thought the Pelosis were his "friends."

SF police and media are constructing hasty cover for the Pelosis, after Paul got carried away during rough sex and took a hammer to his sex-slave. The 911 call and security footage are being withheld, pending manipulation.

I think Paul promised him drugs to snuff Nancy.  Something must have gone wrong. Seriously, how did the guy break in without triggering an alarm.  And, he was only armed with a hammer?  Definitely more to this story than the Pelosi-Press is revealing.
 

Cannonpointer » 31 Oct 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 11:27 am

I'm simply pointing out that fox is a pile of **** - and it simply seems to be giving you piles.

Maybe you need to watch an episode or two of that thinly veiled closet case Hannity, until ya feel better?

Maybe you should let the dust settle and see if you can shake that streak of Bv in you.

Cannonpointer » 31 Oct 2022, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 11:27 am

I'm simply pointing out that fox is a pile of **** - and it simply seems to be giving you piles.

Maybe you need to watch an episode or two of that thinly veiled closet case Hannity, until ya feel better?

I don't think they realize that FOX was acquired by Disney in 2018.
 

Skans » 31 Oct 2022, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

31 Oct 2022, 11:35 am

I think Paul promised him drugs to snuff Nancy.  Something must have gone wrong. Seriously, how did the guy break in without triggering an alarm.  And, he was only armed with a hammer?  Definitely more to this story than the Pelosi-Press is revealing.

Pelosi introduced the hammer. But we all know who the real culprit is.

Donald J. Milhouse Trump.