So THIS ^ is why he screeches "Liar" at everyone. PROJECTION.Pastafarian » 02 Nov 2022, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑
I looked Cali law up and yup, three years of probation for a first time offender.
I took a position, ****.GeorgeWashington » 03 Nov 2022, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ You refuse to take a position on debate forum, so one must assume your position.
If that is not your position, feel free to correct me.
Jantje_Smit » 05 Nov 2022, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ Something smells about the whole story.... but it will be covered up, the truth will never come out....
![]()
https://youtu.be/xjSavNWEEWs
No doubt about that but from what I understand Paul called the police, he opened the door for him, he walked back inside and then the *** nut attacked him with a hammer... that doesn't make any sense... and why did they first say that a third person opened the door.. and what were they doing with that hammer... lol... I'm not sure I want to know that last part...DeplorablePatriot » 05 Nov 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Let's just assume the most plausible explanation for now. *** was involved.
But wait, it gets better... so Paul opened the door for the police while holding a hammer... but you can't see the video, just take their word for it...Jantje_Smit » 05 Nov 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ No doubt about that but from what I understand Paul called the police, he opened the door for him, he walked back inside and then the *** nut attacked him with a hammer... that doesn't make any sense... and why did they first say that a third person opened the door.. and what were they doing with that hammer... lol... I'm not sure I want to know that last part...

Because ALL crimes are planned out in advance.roadkill » 29 Oct 2022, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑It's hard to believe that it happened out of the blue.Cannonpointer » 29 Oct 2022, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑ We know without being told. I dunno about you, but I don't NEED them to tell me. I'm grown. I know that an illiterate meskin junky didn't home-invade the speaker of the house, on account of me not being on *** dick.
You are making OUR argument: this was an amicable social relationship gone awry.
@MistyJantje_Smit » 06 Nov 2022, 2:39 am » wrote: ↑ But wait, it gets better... so Paul opened the door for the police while holding a hammer... but you can't see the video, just take their word for it...
Prosecution Refuses to Release Police Footage Linked to Attack on Nancy Pelosi's Husband
San Francisco prosecutors refuse to release police bodycam and surveillance videos from the home of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, where her husband Paul Pelosi survived a vicious attack by a home intruder last month.
"Mr. Pelosi opened the door, they were both holding a hammer and the police observed Mr. DePape pull that hammer away and then strike Mr. Pelosi,' District Attorney Brooke Jenkins said on Thursday. That is the most that we're going to say at this point. Our job is not to try this case in the public or in the press. It's to try it in a courtroom."
He did not elaborate further on the reasons behind the decision not to share the footage with the general public.
I just posted this in another thread and this thread is a perfect example of what I was talking about.Cannonpointer » 06 Nov 2022, 3:37 am » wrote: ↑You are making OUR argument: this was an amicable social relationship gone awry.
No, you're brainwashed. He has a very SHORT history of posting crazy stuff online. VERY short - even if the back-dating had not been exposed.Misty » 06 Nov 2022, 3:47 am » wrote: ↑ I just posted this in another thread and this thread is a perfect example of what I was talking about.
"I don't post here much any more because I have very little tolerance for brainwashed MAGA cult members and their ridiculous made up conspiracy theories.
You can't reason with people who have no relationship with truth and facts."
The guy who broke into Pelosi's home has a long history of posting conspiracy theory garbage online.
How brainwashed is someone who believes the home of the next in line after Kamala is accessible to crazed illegals with hammers?Misty » 06 Nov 2022, 3:47 am » wrote: ↑He told the FBI exactly why he did it.
Now this is where you tell me that it's a cover up and the FBI is in on it.
Right?
Tucker Carlson? Seriously?Cannonpointer » 06 Nov 2022, 3:40 am » wrote: ↑ Here is what NBC said really happened.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cJtqVuLSx-Q
No.
Nope...a "premeditated crime" is planned in advance. A "non-premeditated" crime is not.
That was the first report on this incident, and we all know how accurate that kind of rush reporting is.Cannonpointer » 06 Nov 2022, 3:52 am » wrote: ↑ WHO OPENED THE DOOR FOR THE COPS, and then went back into the house - the tooth fairy?
Misty » 06 Nov 2022, 4:00 am » wrote: ↑ That was the first report on this incident, and we all know how accurate that kind of rush reporting is.
Examining the false claims about the attack on Nancy Pelosi's husband.
That never matters when the rushed reporting damns a republican, dear.Misty » 06 Nov 2022, 4:00 am » wrote: ↑ That was the first report on this incident, and we all know how accurate that kind of rush reporting is.