Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I am neither **** nor going blind. I see clearly. *** ahoy.
Right.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 8:28 pm » wrote: ↑ Put in a fresh tampon and listen to the whole thing...Fox is essentially saying hold yer water. The others are tying it directly to J6.
There is video of pelosi letting his guest in too duh.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Again...who is yer precious source?
There is video...but it wasn't a plane!
I leave the "sources" to fox fools. They're always the least informed and the loudest.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Again...who is yer precious source?
There is video...but it wasn't a plane!
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I leave the "sources" to fox fools. They're always the least informed and the loudest.
I don't NEED a source to say the sky is blue. You might. I do not.
Post it.Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑ There is video of pelosi letting his guest in too duh.
But you won't see it duh.
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Right.
They're better than MSNBC.
You have a pathetic low bar. They finger your butt, and you defend them that they didn't use their dick.
Posted it already.
Zeets2 » 30 Oct 2022, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, there's no telling right now which one was the preferred "bottom boy", but what tells me that the cover-up is already in full swing is the police report stating that THERE WAS A THIRD PERSON in the home (at 3am, huh?) who actually ANSWERED THE DOOR FOR THE POLICE when they arrived.
So where is HIS statement as an eye witness to the crime? Right now, it's looking to me like they had all had a wild sex party in their underwear, probably where ALL THREE took turns pitching and catching, if you know what I mean!
roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑ The video?
We can agree that it's the latest scam by the dems...we knew they would pull something going into the midterms.
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I leave the "sources" to fox fools. They're always the least informed and the loudest.
I don't NEED a source to say the sky is blue. You might. I do not.
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't think so. It's just a ****'s spat that got out of hand - a sissy fight.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdZ1bMk3fwk
No, we do NOT see things the same.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Now yer posting like a fool. It might surprise you that we see things the same on this latest scam. It's all about the midterms.
We can argue about **** we can't prove but we know what's up.
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ No, we do NOT see things the same.
First, I see fox as being just as full of **** as cnn.
Second, I do not believe for one minute this sissy fight was staged. The old *** got nailed with his own hammer.
Cannonpointer » 30 Oct 2022, 8:57 pm » wrote: ↑ No, we do NOT see things the same.
First, I see fox as being just as full of **** as cnn.
Second, I do not believe for one minute this sissy fight was staged. The old *** got nailed with his own hammer.
roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 9:09 pm » wrote: ↑ I thought the same thing...but there's more to the story after the fact.
They're covering for Paul and blaming Nancy's opponents. And no...fox is not as full of **** as cnn. None of them are perfect, but equating fox with cnn tells me yer skipping something. I don't recall fox tying this to J6...do you?
Now we're getting toward synthesis.roadkill » 30 Oct 2022, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I think yer looking for someone to dump yer load on...I'm not yer guy.
We agree on some things with the scam...but it goes beyond a couple of *** fighting over a hammer. That was the start...but the story will continue even if the media the *** at FOX NEWS won't fill in the blanks.