Liberal Forum

omh » 02 Nov 2022, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2022, 6:49 pm

life only evolves in series parallel occupying space spontaneously forward ancestrally simultaneously here in it. Time of arrive is as accurate as time dead because nothing exceeds evolving as currently displaced.

Translation: Time is a construct by man, it doesn't exist in nature. 

Vegas » 02 Nov 2022, 6:52 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2022, 6:52 pm

Translation: Time is a construct by man, it doesn't exist in nature. 

time does exist in nature as each cycle has its own occupying space while perpetually balancing here. Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical elements to a specific size and erode as part of molecular migration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration each cycle is specifically present now.

Event horizons don't move which reflects time is stationary to each person, place, thing never same details twice. Thermodynamics and rule of 72 calculating interest rates and yields gained during compounding cycle.

DNA is a compounding cycle of reproductions occupying space when specifically inhabiting the moment here. Don't like my honest accountability of my body actually occupying space as only me here since conceived to replace the 30 ancestors that made up my previous 4 generations place 93.75% my unique DNA signature.

the corrupted know they are dishonest within themselves. bump the thread as an in your face, deniers capitalizing of intellectual doubt ancestrally governing social behavior through history to current events.

omh » 03 Nov 2022, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Nov 2022, 9:31 am

the corrupted know they are dishonest within themselves. bump the thread as an in your face, deniers capitalizing of intellectual doubt ancestrally governing social behavior through history to current events.

For @SJConspirator  ... omh knows you're punishing him for exposing the truth about life in plain sight and your corruption... but he doesn't care, you're only proving him right by trying to ridicule him... he bumped your thread to let you know he knows...

 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Nov 2022, 6:21 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2022, 6:21 pm

If he was to quit using the fake  persona I might show him enough respect to at least read his posts.

The Wild ***'s Skin is omh in novel form.
Long-winded, tangents galore, etc.
All to make a point that is anti-climatic at best.

Some people like it, most people groan (and end up ignoring it).
Is it worth the effort for so little pay-off?

Only the reader can be sure.   



 

omh » 02 Nov 2022, 6:57 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Nov 2022, 6:57 pm

time does exist in nature as each cycle has its own occupying space while perpetually balancing here. Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical elements to a specific size and erode as part of molecular migration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration each cycle is specifically present now.

Event horizons don't move which reflects time is stationary to each person, place, thing never same details twice. Thermodynamics and rule of 72 calculating interest rates and yields gained during compounding cycle.

DNA is a compounding cycle of reproductions occupying space when specifically inhabiting the moment here. Don't like my honest accountability of my body actually occupying space as only me here since conceived to replace the 30 ancestors that made up my previous 4 generations place 93.75% my unique DNA signature.

To be clear

Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical elements to a specifically present never same total sum again for the duration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration each cycle is specific size and erode as each cycle has its own occupying space while perpetually balancing here. Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical


 

Mrkelly » 04 Nov 2022, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 9:51 am

To be clear

Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical elements to a specifically present never same total sum again for the duration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration sustaining forms shaped universally present never same total sum again for the duration each cycle is specific size and erode as each cycle has its own occupying space while perpetually balancing here. Inorganic objects are alive because they evolve by combined chemical

Inorganic objects are not alive. Organic systems could be loosely translated as objects, I suppose.

But, can a system actually be "alive"? No.

Ergo. saying that inorganic things are not alive is redundant as hell.

My metal desk is not alive.
Saying the computer system is "live" does not make it "alive".

Sincerely,
Dr. Shoove 
Dept. of Redundancy Department.

Katsaridaphobia » 04 Nov 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 10:08 am

No offense. omh is a **** idiot and he is the only person on my ignore list.

Non Taken.    

DeezerShoove » 04 Nov 2022, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 9:49 am

The Wild ***'s Skin is omh in novel form.
Long-winded, tangents galore, etc.
All to make a point that is anti-climatic at best.

Some people like it, most people groan (and end up ignoring it).
Is it worth the effort for so little pay-off?

Only the reader can be sure.   

Whenever  I encounter such aimless mumbo jumbo and jibber jabber my mind quickly shifts into "autotune mode" with 1,000,000 OHMs of resistance.....
which greatly improves the signal to noise ratio...
 
 

DeezerShoove » 04 Nov 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 10:06 am

Inorganic objects are not alive. Organic systems could be loosely translated as objects, I suppose.

But, can a system actually be "alive"? No.

Ergo. saying that inorganic things are not alive is redundant as hell.

My metal desk is not alive.
Saying the computer system is "live" does not make it "alive".

Sincerely,
Dr. Shoove 
Dept. of Redundancy Department.

I supposely translated as hell.

But, can a systems could be "alive.
Saying thing the computer system is not alive. Organic systems computer systems computer systems could be "alive.
Sayings are not as objects, I supposely translated as objects are not alive.

Ergo. sayings are not alive"? No.

Ergo. saying things are not as objects are not as objects are not alive is redundant as objects are not alive"? No.

But, can a systems could be loosely be "alive. Organic objects are not alive it "alive. Org
 

Katsaridaphobia » 04 Nov 2022, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 10:08 am

No offense. omh is a **** idiot and he is the only person on my ignore list.

 
 

You ignore how evolving works in plain sight evolving as one of a kind yourself in plain sight. Your choice to ignore me and tell everyone you do, just validates everything I describe how stupid ignoring how evolving really is to everyone limited physically to occupying space mutually evolving as specifically displaced adapting and navigating geographically here, as "life is what it is total sum reproductions added now.".

 

NA to the species to their DNA to their DNA to population the anception currention current.. Intents in gap previous 4 generation gap previous 4 generation currents in gap previous 4 generation currention generation the space here space intellectual argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argument.. Intents intellectual link possible or added by ancestral argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argumently always were sing forward now as eternally corrupt evolving presentionally space here incestor wouldn't occupy

Mrkelly » 04 Nov 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:42 pm

NA to the species to their DNA to their DNA to population the anception currention current.. Intents in gap previous 4 generation gap previous 4 generation currents in gap previous 4 generation currention generation the space here space intellectual argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argument.. Intents intellectual link possible or added by ancestral argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argumently always were sing forward now as eternally corrupt evolving presentionally space here incestor wouldn't occupy

Alright! enough.!!!!
one omh is ok.. two or three... NO! I'm dizzy. and now i have to lay down and its all your guys fault.  
 

Mrkelly » 04 Nov 2022, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:42 pm

NA to the species to their DNA to their DNA to population the anception currention current.. Intents in gap previous 4 generation gap previous 4 generation currents in gap previous 4 generation currention generation the space here space intellectual argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argument.. Intents intellectual link possible or added by ancestral argument.. Intent.. Intellectual argumently always were sing forward now as eternally corrupt evolving presentionally space here incestor wouldn't occupy

You went to same communication skills school as Kamala Harris did.

sootedupCyndi » 04 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm

Alright! enough.!!!!
one omh is ok.. two or three... NO! I'm dizzy. and now i have to lay down and its all your guys fault.

lol.  

omh » 04 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm

You went to same communication skills school as Kamala Harris did.

one man’s gibberish is another man’s folly 

Mrkelly » 04 Nov 2022, 4:54 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:54 pm

one man’s gibberish is another man’s folly 

one reproduction's understanding of genetic timing of perpetual motion balancing outcomes of ever changing total sum of population present always the last 5 generations added since inception arranged in natural selection of 16 original great great grandparents, reduced into 8 progressive great grandparents, devalued numerically into 4 grandparenting 2 parents added each generation change of previous 4 generation gaps great great grandchild carrying 93.75% of their previous 30 lifetimes mixed up never duplicated DNA one lifetime at a time forward now.

previous lifetimes add next generation all ending up male or female addition to the male and female parents and grandparents, and great grandparents, and great great grandparents.
So simple because it doesn't change biological methods any generation inception to extinction of current numbers each rotation of the planet.

You keep denying it is self evident, I am not the one staying fooled since birth. Everyone saving reality is.

omh » 04 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm

one reproduction's understanding of genetic timing of perpetual motion balancing outcomes of ever changing total sum of population present always the last 5 generations added since inception arranged in natural selection of 16 original great great grandparents, reduced into 8 progressive great grandparents, devalued numerically into 4 grandparenting 2 parents added each generation change of previous 4 generation gaps great great grandchild carrying 93.75% of their previous 30 lifetimes mixed up never duplicated DNA one lifetime at a time forward now.

previous lifetimes add next generation all ending up male or female addition to the male and female parents and grandparents, and great grandparents, and great great grandparents.
So simple because it doesn't change biological methods any generation inception to extinction of current numbers each rotation of the planet.

You keep denying it is self evident, I am not the one staying fooled since birth. Everyone saving reality is.

one last 5 generations added DNA one lifetime forward numericated since in natural selection changing outcomes of 16 original sum of their previous 30 lifetic timing of 16 origing total motion arrying 2 parent always the last 5 generation previous 30 lifetime forward now. one lifetiming of previous 30 lifetime forward now. one last 5 genetime at always the lifetime forward numerically into 8 previous 4 generation of produced DNA one last 5 genetime at great great granged up never duplicated now. 
 

Omh is fired up now. The first sentence is the most important.

Mrkelly » 04 Nov 2022, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Nov 2022, 4:19 pm

I supposely translated as hell.

But, can a systems could be "alive.
Saying thing the computer system is not alive. Organic systems computer systems computer systems could be "alive.
Sayings are not as objects, I supposely translated as objects are not alive.

Ergo. sayings are not alive"? No.

Ergo. saying things are not as objects are not as objects are not alive is redundant as objects are not alive"? No.

But, can a systems could be loosely be "alive. Organic objects are not alive it "alive. Org

omh couldn't have said it better.
Thanks for the salad... which is organic.
And used to be alive... if it is a lettuce pile. 

Word pile? Wood pile? Wood pyre? Good wood... Got wood.

How much ground can a ground hog grind,
If a ground hog could grind ground?