Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
No More One Sided J6 Hearings
No More One Sided J6 Hearings
By roadkill
11 Nov 2022 6:07 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Jan 2023 2:04 pm
Now the democrats need to pull any Democrat in these investigations and say that any investigation is one sided and only has Republicans on it.jerrab » 17 Jan 2023, 3:00 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.propublica.org/article/befo ... dent-trump
===================================After Bowser sent her New Year’s Eve request for help from the D.C. National Guard, the DOD memo says it approved sending 340 Guard members to support local officials. It further says that on Tuesday, Bowser delivered a letter confirming that Washington officials had all the support they needed.But a spokesperson for Bowser’s office told NBC News that it was McCarthy, not the mayor, who made the key decisions about the National Guard’s response, including setting the number of personnel and establishing “that the guard members were not to move East of 9th Street NW,” blocks away from the Capitol itself.
17 Jan 2023 2:06 pm
The democrats should tell McCarthy who they want on the committess and investigations and if he doesn't put them on the committee pull all democrats and say it's a one sided investigation with no democrats on it.
17 Jan 2023 2:31 pm
You didn't build that! Tsar Cannon in Moscow, 1586Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2023, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Your simperings fail... to respect your daughter's rights, cuck dad... in showers.
17 Jan 2023 2:35 pm
17 Jan 2023 3:22 pm
Largest-bore functional cannon on earth. So potent it has THREE balls.
**** a corvette. THAT^ is how one compensates.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
17 Jan 2023 3:26 pm
https://apnews.com/article/capitol-riot ... 86a999d261Majik » 17 Jan 2023, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ Plenty of proof.....
starting with this .....Jan. 6 Report Faults Failure to Heed Intelligence Warnings
- Committee’s final report says signs of trouble were clear
- Threat assessments had warned Congress could be target
Demonstrators attempt to breach the U.S. Capitol after they earlier stormed the building in Washington, DC, on Jan. 6, 2021. Photographer: Victor J. Blue/BloombergByBilly House23 December 2022, 03:15 GMT-3:30Share this articleNew
Gift this article
Follow the authors
@HouseInSession
+ Get alerts forBilly HouseThe House Committee’s report on Jan. 6 details unheeded intelligence warnings and other security lapses that allowed a mob of Trump supporters to storm the building.Impending violence in the days before the insurrection was — in the words of Gen. Mark Milley — “clear to all.” An advanced threat assessment by Capitol Police on Jan. 3 even warned “Congress itself is a target.”https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... e-warnings
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy and three other GOP lawmakers should face ethics investigations for their refusal to comply with congressional subpoenas, the House Jan. 6 committee said Monday in the culmination of a monthslong standoff over their testimony.The committee had issued subpoenas in May for the testimony of McCarthy — who is vying to become House speaker in January — as well as Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Scott Perry of Pennsylvania, and Andy Biggs of Arizona, saying all had crucial information to share about the Jan. 6 attack and the actions of former President Donald Trump.But all of them defied the order for testimony and documents. The Jan. 6 committee on Monday acknowledged that sending referrals to the House Ethics Committee was a major step, but said their defiance could not go unanswered.Another GOP member who ignored a committee subpoena, Rep. Mo Brooks of Alabama who is leaving Congress after this year, was not cited by the panel.
17 Jan 2023 3:30 pm
https://www.vox.com/22588475/kevin-mcca ... nks-jordanMajik » 17 Jan 2023, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ You are the one that has no argument ......
Pelosi refused because she did not want Jordan or Banks on the commitee **** up her contrived Hollywood produced sideshow of political subterfuge.
Jordan prior to the creation of the committee wanted Pelosi to testify as well as release all of the footage of that day with audio .......
----------------------------------------McCarthy’s news conference came hours after Pelosi rejected the nomination to the committee of two of McCarthy’s five proposed Republicans: Reps. Jim Jordan and Jim Banks, who both voted in January against certifying two states’ results which contributed to President Joe Biden’s victory over Donald Trump. Instead of nominating more suitable Republicans to the committee, McCarthy opted to try to blow the whole thing up.And while McCarthy accused Pelosi of “playing politics” by rejecting Jordan and Banks, the irony is it’s his party that has an electoral interest in maintaining a fog of confusion around an insurrection that will be a major issue heading into next year’s midterms and the 2024 presidential election.
17 Jan 2023 3:56 pm
Yeah, just like pelousi did with the J6 unselect dog and pony show!!! You **** liberals are always guilty of doing what you accuse those you disagree with of doing.Justthetruth » 17 Jan 2023, 3:06 pm » wrote: ↑ The democrats should tell McCarthy who they want on the committess and investigations and if he doesn't put them on the committee pull all democrats and say it's a one sided investigation with no democrats on it.
17 Jan 2023 7:48 pm
Thanks for proving you didn't read the provided link.
17 Jan 2023 7:55 pm
Republicans can now subpoena Nancy's texts and emails, so we can find out what she knew.ScottMon » 17 Jan 2023, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Trump doesn't answer to Pelosi. Pelosi didn't know that Trump was going to spearhead an assault on Jan6th. These feeble attempts to blame Pelosi are hilarious.
What WE know is that she was responsible for security, and they DECREASED security, while denying an offer from Trump for more troops.
17 Jan 2023 8:16 pm
yeah, like not letting mccarthy filling the committee with trump supporters? a committee investigating trump and his supporters.Buffalo » 17 Jan 2023, 4:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, just like pelousi did with the J6 unselect dog and pony show!!! You **** liberals are always guilty of doing what you accuse those you disagree with of doing.
17 Jan 2023 8:20 pm
trump only wanted the national guard to protect trump supporters and have the national guard to fight the capitol police.golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 8:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Republicans can now subpoena Nancy's texts and emails, so we can find out what she knew.
What WE know is that she was responsible for security, and they DECREASED security, while denying an offer from Trump for more troops.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------According to Miller's testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia's mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden's presidential election victory.Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congre ... 021-05-12/
17 Jan 2023 8:22 pm
Riiiight.jerrab » 17 Jan 2023, 9:20 pm » wrote: ↑ trump only wanted the national guard to protect trump supporters and have the national guard to fight the capitol police.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------According to Miller's testimony, Trump asked during that meeting whether the District of Columbia's mayor had requested National Guard troops for Jan. 6, the day Congress was to ratify Joe Biden's presidential election victory.Trump told Miller to "fill" the request, the former defense secretary testified. Miller said Trump told him: "Do whatever is necessary to protect demonstrators
that were executing their constitutionally protected rights."
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/congre ... 021-05-12/
At least you've abandoned the lie that he didn't try to make them available.
17 Jan 2023 8:25 pm
i never said that.golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 9:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Riiiight.
At least you've abandoned the lie that he didn't try to make them available.
he only wanted to protect trump supporters and have the national guard fight the national police. he could not care less about the capitol and anyone in it.
17 Jan 2023 8:29 pm
Why would the National Guard fight the Capitol Police?jerrab » 17 Jan 2023, 9:25 pm » wrote: ↑ i never said that.
he only wanted to protect trump supporters and have the national guard fight the national police. he could not care less about the capitol and anyone in it.
Who would have ordered that?
17 Jan 2023 8:39 pm
golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 9:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Why would the National Guard fight the Capitol Police?
Who would have ordered that?
trump. he wanted to protect his supporters from the capitol police.
17 Jan 2023 8:46 pm
Trump doesn't actually tell the Guard what to do.jerrab » 17 Jan 2023, 9:39 pm » wrote: ↑ trump. he wanted to protect his supporters from the capitol police.
He just makes them available to people who actually DO command them.
17 Jan 2023 9:31 pm
golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump doesn't actually tell the Guard what to do.
He just makes them available to people who actually DO command them.
nope. he was commander in chief and that applies to the national guard.
17 Jan 2023 9:32 pm
Cool. Show us the orders.jerrab » 17 Jan 2023, 10:31 pm » wrote: ↑ nope. he was commander in chief and that applies to the national guard.
17 Jan 2023 9:34 pm
---------------------------------golfboy » 17 Jan 2023, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump doesn't actually tell the Guard what to do.
He just makes them available to people who actually DO command them.
The President is Commander in Chief of all the armed forces of the United States—the Air Force as well as the Army and the Navy.
Who is online
In total there are 5391 users online :: 13 registered, 15 bots, and 5363 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: MicroMessenger, proximic, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, okhttp, ADmantX, YandexBot, Applebot, curl/7, CriteoBot, Baiduspider, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google