Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:05 pm

Then don't piss about my response to it, Sheilagh..

PP, why are you discussing Colt firearms on my thread that is about the Glock 43x?

nod when you understand.  Or never, ever, bitch and moan about your thread.  Nod again.  And say Yes Sir

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:53 pm

No....

You have never answered it.

There is a reason I am asking, which will become apparent in time.

Yes…
Answered multiple times.  Now get on with it.  Make it apparent NOW or lick your wounds and go.

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 2:09 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:09 pm

Yes…
Answered multiple times.  Now get on with it.  Make it apparent NOW or lick your wounds and go.

How can we be certain that the citation is referring to ONE family?


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:11 pm

How can we be certain that the citation is referring to ONE family?

You tell me and make your point apparent NOW.  Question time is over.

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 2:12 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:12 pm

You tell me and make your point apparent NOW.  Question time is over.

Defaulting right out of the gate.


shall we make it official?

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm

Defaulting right out of the gate.

shall we make it official?

You make it official by making a point we can discuss.  I can’t default on something I never agreed to.  Even answering what questions I did goes against what I told you.  We will do this on my terms. So you started it up on this thread that was your agreement to my terms.

You are losing and you are losing bad.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:13 pm

Defaulting right out of the gate.

shall we make it official?

God! Stop with your incessant questions. Just one day, I would like to see if you have what it takes to not hide even once. Just one day. 

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:16 pm

You make it official by making a point we can discuss.  I can’t default on something I never agreed to.  Even answering what questions I did goes against what I told you.  We will do this on my terms. So you started it up on this thread that was your agreement to my terms.

You are losing and you are losing bad.

Tiny,


This was the ONE condition you had to meet. 

All you are asked to do is to acknowledge the facts of the citation.

And you can't do it.


It's a problem you have with Objective Facts.

 

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:22 pm

God! Stop with your incessant questions. Just one day, I would like to see if you have what it takes to not hide even once. Just one day.

Post the rule, and your stipulation.

Or shut the **** up, Princess.
 

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:22 pm

God! Stop with your incessant questions. Just one day, I would like to see if you have what it takes to not hide even once. Just one day.

It really is an ingrained Democrat tactic to ask incessant, nonsensical questions.  It just goes to show that their thoughts have to first piggyback off of another person's thoughts.  Whether these wackjobs agree or disagree doesn't matter, they simply are incapable of creating their own material.
 

Skans » 17 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm

It really is an ingrained Democrat tactic to ask incessant, nonsensical questions.  It just goes to show that their thoughts have to first piggyback off of another person's thoughts.  Whether these wackjobs agree or disagree doesn't matter, they simply are incapable of creating their own material.

True, but @Blackvegetable  takes it to the extreme. He abuses the privilege. I have seen other dims on this site come up with their own thoughts on things. I mean, they are stupid as hell, and make zero sense, but they at least made an effort to defend an opinion on their own. Veghead has been here since 2017. Not one intelligent thought of his own has been posted. Not a single one. 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:34 pm

Post the rule, and your stipulation.

Or shut the **** up, Princess.

My sig. 

How many **** times? My God your memory is so awful. Just **** awful. 

1. As usual, I have to remind you that I don't give a **** about your opinion of the rule/stipulations.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:32 pm

Tiny,

This was the ONE condition you had to meet. 

All you are asked to do is to acknowledge the facts of the citation.

And you can't do it.

It's a problem you have with Objective Facts.

Umm….I am not under any obligation to meet any conditions.  This is your diversion.

I gave you the citation.  I have acknowledged the facts of the citations.

Make your case.

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:45 pm

Umm….I am not under any obligation to meet any conditions.  This is your diversion.

I gave you the citation.  I have acknowledged the facts of the citations.

Make your case.

this isn't "something for nothing", Sheilagh. 

I'm not doing this again in 2 weeks because you can't read.

Either be bitch enough to acknowledge the facts, or lose.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 3:50 pm

this isn't "something for nothing", Sheilagh. 

I'm not doing this again in 2 weeks because you can't read.

Either be bitch enough to acknowledge the facts, or lose.

Hey, this is your diversion.  I am under no obligation to do a thing.  Where do you come up with this goofy ****? Particularly when I have over and over again acknowledged the citation I originally posted?  

Now get going with your case, PP.  

The only reason you have to do it again in 2 weeks is because You Will divert with it.  I have acknowledged the citation.  It is MY **** citation. 

Keep losing, PP.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:34 am

Since you are Askholio, define "Google gun expert"...

No questions, dick sucker. 

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 11:32 am

You're being asked to stipulate 
 

No questions, dick sucker.

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:48 pm

How can we be certain that the citation is referring to ONE family?

No questions, dick sucker.

​​​​​​​https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:53 pm

There is a reason I am asking, 

No questions, dick sucker.

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 2:11 pm

How can we be certain that the citation is referring to ONE family?

No questions, dick sucker.

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
​​​​​​​