Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:44 pm

No narratives, Sheilagh. 

How can we be certain that the author is telling us there is ONE family?

Poppa’s ******,

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

Acknowledge these facts or pound sand.


 

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:47 pm

Please bring some objective facts and an argument.

Nothing but questions about facts already acknowledged is not beating anyone.

I have...."your citation".

Nod.

Acknowledge the facts therein.


 

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:49 pm

Poppa’s ******,

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

Acknowledge these facts or pound sand.

You clearly don't know what a fact is.

Now stop yapping and either answer the question or admit that you can't. 



 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:51 pm

I have...."your citation".

Nod.

Acknowledge the facts therein.

I'm sick of this thread.  BV, JUST BUY A FREAKING GUN.....NO, WAIT, BUY 10 GUNS, AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE BLACK!!!
 

Skans » 17 Nov 2022, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:54 pm

I'm sick of this thread.  BV, JUST BUY A FREAKING GUN.....NO, WAIT, BUY 10 GUNS, AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE BLACK!!!

**** off.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 6:54 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:54 pm

You clearly don't know what a fact is.

Now stop yapping and either answer the question or admit that you can't.

PP,  whether you are smart enough to realize it or not the moment you acknowledged that citation was mine you admitted you have brought no facts to the table.  So for you to claim I don’t acknowledge facts is a blatant lie.  When you bring facts to the table we can continue.  At the moment I am waiting for you to acknowledge the only facts on the table, brought by my me. If you disagree with these Facts explain why:

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 6:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 6:51 pm

I have...."your citation".

Nod.

Acknowledge the facts therein.

Already done.  Multiple times.  You have brought no facts.

With that said I am waiting for you to acknowledge the only facts brought to the table.  If you disagree with these facts bring forth your argument.  I’ll check in the morning to see if you found your balls or if they are still in dad’s pocket:

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.
 

Huey » 17 Nov 2022, 7:21 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 7:21 pm

Already done.  Multiple times.  You have brought no facts.

With that said I am waiting for you to acknowledge the only facts brought to the table.  If you disagree with these facts bring forth your argument.  I’ll check in the morning to see if you found your balls or if they are still in dad’s pocket:

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design



Are there any objective facts in the above?





 

Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 8:02 pm

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

Are there any objective facts in the above?

Already done.  Multiple times.  You have brought no facts.

With that said I am waiting for you to acknowledge the only facts brought to the table.  If you disagree with these facts bring forth your argument.  I’ll check in the morning to see if you found your balls or if they are still in dad’s pocket:

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

Selaphobia » 18 Nov 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:27 am

Took a look at your archives.

I appreciate why you are so bitter.

Who is Shagpoke Whipple?


QED.
 

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 8:48 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 8:48 am

Already done.  Multiple times.  You have brought no facts.

With that said I am waiting for you to acknowledge the only facts brought to the table.  If you disagree with these facts bring forth your argument.  I’ll check in the morning to see if you found your balls or if they are still in dad’s pocket:

Waiting for your facts. I am the only one bringing.  No one has any clue what you are arguing about.  So far you have done nothing but agree with the citations I provided and the below summary:

All you have is a repost of my citation and questions.  But have presented no facts.  Are you going to post any facts?

Acknowledge the first time, PP.

Present some facts so we can discuss.

All you have done is is present a citation (in part) that I posted and ask questions.  I am the only one who has presented facts.  Let me know when you do and I will be happy to discuss them.

The only facts presented to this point have been by me:

1.  Colt is the only company that can manufacture and market a rifle under the AR 15 Trademark.  Nod,

2.  There is only one family of COLT AR 15 weapons. Nod.

You were talking "canned responses".


You must be the dumbest **** to ever walk this Earth.

To be clear..

Is your current position that the passage from what you insist is your citation contains NO facts?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:51 am

You were talking "canned responses".

You must be the dumbest **** to ever walk this Earth.

To be clear..

Is your current position that the passage from what you insist is your citation contains NO facts?

To be clear…

You have an argument and point to make.  And that has already been answered.
 

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:52 am

To be clear…

You have an argument and point to make.  And that has already been answered.

No...I don't. 

You have facts to acknowledge.
 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:54 am

No...I don't. 

You have facts to acknowledge.

Already acknowledged.

If you don’t have a point to make you are just yammering incoherently.

Selaphobia » 18 Nov 2022, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:02 am

BV owned a shotgun but he lost it in the "shared wall" of glorified duplex he lives in.
You would think you could find it inside a shared wall, right?
Nope. Just like the Bermuda Triangle, gone.
BV should never be allowed to own a weapon again.
He is irresponsible and as well as gun illiterate.

Skans, ask BV about "gun pieces" or "guns in pieces"...

@Huey  am I correct?

How do you lose a shotgun in a wall?  Also, what's a "gun piece"?
 

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 9:56 am

Already acknowledged.

If you don’t have a point to make you are just yammering incoherently.

You insist I HAVEN’T posted any objective facts.

But you've acknowledged them.


You're a moron.


#readhissig 

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 10:15 am

You insist I HAVEN’T posted any objective facts.

But you've acknowledged them.

You're a moron.

#readhissig

If you did not have a point or argument to make (your words);there is no need to continue.

Skans » 18 Nov 2022, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 10:10 am

How do you lose a shotgun in a wall?  Also, what's a "gun piece"?

I don’t know if it is in the wall but he claims to own a shotgun but does not know where it is.  As far as “gun, in pieces” I posted a pic and in the pic was a Kydex holster.  Bv thought the holster was a gun, in pieces.  

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 10:19 am

I don’t know if it is in the wall but he claims to own a shotgun but does not know where it is.  As far as “gun, in pieces” I posted a pic and in the pic was a Kydex holster.  Bv thought the holster was a gun, in pieces.

LOL - sort of hard to confuse a Kydex holster with a gun.   
 

Skans » 18 Nov 2022, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 10:22 am

LOL - sort of hard to confuse a Kydex holster with a gun. 

It was hilarious.  In the pic you could see a magazine, or part of it.  He went on for hours about how that justified his initial thought.