Obviously, to you, that doesn't constitute a contradiction, 2Stands...Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:17 am » wrote: ↑ If you did not have a point or argument to make (your words);there is no need to continue.
It's always better retold..Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ It was hilarious. In the pic you could see a magazine, or part of it. He went on for hours about how that justified his initial thought.
You have yet to take a stand.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Obviously, to you, that doesn't constitute a contradiction, 2Stands...
Shouldn’t of went there, you know what comes next.
Nothing is better than the record.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑It's always better retold..Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ It was hilarious. In the pic you could see a magazine, or part of it. He went on for hours about how that justified his initial thought.
Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2022, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑damn, are you stupid.
is that a gun, in pieces..
and the bed unmade?
been spankin'?
There are none left....you've taken them all, 2StandsCannedResponse..
The debate was over whether or not a "magazine" constitutes a "part of a gun".Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ Nothing is better than the record.![]()
![]()
The quote link will get ya back to the thread where you on and on about it.
Kydex, you haven’t taken a position on this thread concerning the the citation you diverted with. Let me know when you do.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ There are none left....you've taken them all, 2StandsCannedResponse..
Had I not taken a clear, consistent and unassailable position , you would have no reason to rush headling into this curbstomping with such predictable frequency.
You said it was a gun, in pieces…Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ The debate was over whether or not a "magazine" constitutes a "part of a gun".
But why this distraction from your inability to take a position on facts, or exhibit basic reading skills?
Try to not Play Stupid..Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ Kydex, you haven’t taken a position on this thread concerning the the citation you diverted with. Let me know when you do.
No more retelling, Tiny...Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ You said it was a gun, in pieces…
It is a Kydex Holster. So no, that was not a gun, in pieces. But, if you continue I will show what you recently implied about “holstered guns”.
waiting for you to post a clear, consistent and unassailable position.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑ Try to not Play Stupid..
There's a glaring sucking emotional wound of a subtext to this thread.
You are now near deafened by the familiar sound of your head banging against the rollers.
You should stop cranking.
This is one of the holsters I use for a gun that I pocket-carry. I can understand, in this case, confusing the holster with the gun......sort of.

This dodge is always a lie.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑ waiting for you to post a clear, consistent and unassailable position
Skans,Skans » 18 Nov 2022, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ This is one of the holsters I use for a gun that I pocket-carry. I can understand, in this case, confusing the holster with the gun......sort of.
FYI, I use this for a micro 9, and had to modify the holster to get it to fit perfectly. Gotta be careful with a holster like this one, though. After modifying the holster (mine is better quality than the one pictured), I was able to get it to print just like a wallet - can't tell its a gun. And, yes, it is legal because the slide is not concealed. If the slide was inside of the wallet holster, that would make it a Class III AOW.
All you have done is repost MY CITATION and asked questions. So you make your position known.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ This dodge is always a lie.
Your demonstrated inability to recognize objective facts, or even understand the written word, constitutes far too high a hurdle - even in the absence of your pathological zerointegrity - to convincing you of what is Obvious.
Why? What do you believe will inevitably follow? Do you think this is some form of illegal carry? I assure you, it's not. It is perfectly legal. I am well versed on what is and is not legal to carry.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ Skans,
I appreciate you sharing this truthy thing, but you should think very hard before subjecting yourself to what will inevitably follow.
Not at all....much worse...Skans » 18 Nov 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Why? What do you believe will inevitably follow? Do you think this is some form of illegal carry? I assure you, it's not. It is perfectly legal. I am well versed on what is and is not legal to carry.
You mean this Colt rifle? LOL - they should all be made this well! Oh, how I would have loved to get my hands on the recent reissue of this one by Colt in semi-auto!!!Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ All you have done is repost MY CITATION and asked questions. So you make your position known.
So, there is one family of COLT semiautomatic rifles. Why should we care?
