Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Hey BV, since you’re the google gun expert…
Hey BV, since you’re the google gun expert…
By Huey
12 Nov 2022 8:33 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
18 Nov 2022 2:07 pm
Just do it.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:08 pm
One. I can read.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑ Let's start with this...
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family
You were asked to confirm to how many families this refers.
The answer is
"One"
How can we be 100% certain?
now your point…
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:13 pm
This is not how WE can be certain, **** idiot
No...not really.I can read.
18 Nov 2022 2:14 pm
Your lie, Tiny.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑This is a lie..Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Need a rule here….
Explain why I must agree to what you think are facts…
You weren't asked to do so.
Acknowledge.
18 Nov 2022 2:15 pm
Still no point.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ This is not how WE can be certain, **** idiot
No...not really.
You lied twice on this thread concerning the fact Colt is the only manufacturer who can use the AR 15 trademark. You said that is wrong. You have been running ever since.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:15 pm
We've established that we are talking about ONE family...
You can't tell me why..
18 Nov 2022 2:17 pm
lmao! Post your point in hijacking this thread to discuss the Colt Family of AR Weapons.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:17 pm
The point was made a long time ago..Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ Still no point.
You lied twice on this thread concerning the fact Colt is the only manufacturer who can use the AR 15 trademark. You said that is wrong. You have been running ever since.
We are just remaking it...again.
But you can't explain why you finally agree that it is ONE familty
18 Nov 2022 2:18 pm
Huh, odd, you just claimed you did not ask me to acknowledge or agree to what you think are facts. Another of your lies is dismissed.Blackvegetable » 17 Nov 2022, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑ this isn't "something for nothing", Sheilagh.
I'm not doing this again in 2 weeks because you can't read.
Either be bitch enough to acknowledge the facts, or lose.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:20 pm
No, this is your argument. You tell me why. You brought it up, not me.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑ We've established that we are talking about ONE family...
You can't tell me why..
While you may think you are lawyer material because you beat a disgraced divorce lawyer and some back woods judge in a civil case you do not have the stones todo it here.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:22 pm
You brought it up here. You explain your point. Because no matter what I say you will have the wiggle room to claim I am wrong. So, man up and take a stand.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:17 pm » wrote: ↑ The point was made a long time ago..
We are just remaking it...again.
But you can't explain why you finally agree that it is ONE familty
Although I have already posted about it. No, the Colt AR 15 Sporter, and any Colt AR 15 thereafter, was not designed for the battlefield.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:25 pm
@BlackvegetableHuey » 18 Nov 2022, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Here is my point. Since you won’t make one. The Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons has many variations and multiple categories.
Some were designed for the battlefield, others were not.
Colt is the only company that manufacture and market a rifle with the AR 15 trademark.
Facts you are running from.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:26 pm
@BlackvegetableHuey » 18 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Then you got nothing but the rantings of an old man who is losing his mind.
These facts are established:
1. There is one Family of Colt AR weapons with a multiple categories.
2. One of the categories is weapons used by the military.
3. One of the others is for civilian and law enforcement.
4. There is no weapon on the military list with a selector designation of S-1.
5. All weapons on the Civilian lost have a selector designation of S-1.
Acknowledge those fact before moving on.
More facty thingys.
It seems you can’t dispute them.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:26 pm
No...they aren't..
They're assertions.
18 Nov 2022 2:28 pm
I will do so, again.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
More facty thingys.
It seems you can’t dispute them.
Using only agreed upon facts from what you assert is your citation.
Last chance to answer the question before you default.
18 Nov 2022 2:29 pm
Actually, no, they facts straight from citations on this thread. Apparently you don’t know what is contained in the citation you posted.
Like these two:
4. There is no weapon on the military list with a selector designation of S-1.
5. All weapons on the Civilian lost have a selector designation of S-1.
You just showed you have no clue what is in the citation you posted.
Mic Drop. You lose.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:31 pm
More assertions, in support of your assertions.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Actually, no, they facts straight from citations on this thread. Apparently you don’t know what is contained in the citation you posted.
Like these two:
4. There is no weapon on the military list with a selector designation of S-1.
5. All weapons on the Civilian lost have a selector designation of S-1.
You just showed you have no clue what is in the citation you posted.
Mic Drop. You lose.
Let's focus on what you insist is YOUR citation.
18 Nov 2022 2:31 pm
Sorry, you have already lost that point.. Those are facts from the source of the citation. You claimed they are assertions. You need to go to the source page and see that you just made an *** of your self. If you ask nice,y I will give you the link to the citation. You didn’t provide it.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑ I will do so, again.
Using only agreed upon facts from what you assert is your citation.
Last chance to answer the question before you default.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
18 Nov 2022 2:33 pm
Shut the **** up and focus, dim little twat.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ No, this is your argument. You tell me why. You brought it up, not me.
While you may think you are lawyer material because you beat a disgraced divorce lawyer and some back woods judge in a civil case you do not have the stones todo it here.
We are concerned with the facts in what you insist is your citation.
18 Nov 2022 2:34 pm
Here comes the pic. Predictable piece of ****.
First, you prove that you know the difference between a mistake and a lie.
Then you got a deal.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Who is online
In total there are 4918 users online :: 8 registered, 14 bots, and 4896 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, ROG62, LowIQTrash, SouthernFried, nefarious101, Huey
Bots: GPTBot, okhttp, NING, proximic, ADmantX, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, bingbot, Baiduspider, curl/7, Googlebot