Liberal Forum

VD said Colt is the only one allowed to use the AR platform?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm

More assertions, in support of your assertions.

Let's focus on what you insist is YOUR citation.

Sorry, you lose again.  Here is the link I gave you in the past.  You better scroll past the first few sentences.  I posted facts.  The only one making assertion, false assertions, is you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

Scroll to down or use the contents links to see the various lists of sub category of the Colt AR 15 and M16 rifles.  

I posted fact.  Told ya so.  You lose ****,

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:33 pm

Shut the **** up and focus, dim little twat.

We are concerned with the facts in what you insist is your citation.

I posted facts.  You lost.  I just gave you the link you failed to post

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm

Sorry, you lose again. Here is the link I gave you in the past.  You better scroll past the first few sentences.  I posted facts.  The only one making assertion, false assertions, is you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

Scroll to down or use the contents links to see the various lists of sub category of the Colt AR 15 and M16 rifles.  

I posted fact.  Told ya so.  You lose ****,

Don't divert, Tiny.


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm

Don't divert, Tiny.

I can’t divert.  I am the only taking a stand, posting facts, and kicking your ***.  Wanna see, PP?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm

More assertions, in support of your assertions.

Let's focus on what you insist is YOUR citation.

No assertions.  Here is the link to the citations:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

Prove me wrong.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:36 pm

I posted facts. You lost.  I just gave you the link you failed to post

Stop lying.


We know that it is ONE family because the noun is singular, reinforced by the definite article preceeding it.


Nod.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:38 pm

Stop lying.

We know that it is ONE family because the noun is singular, reinforced by the definite article preceeding it.

Nod.

I have already said there is one family.

My response was , So, what’s your point.  This is your diversion.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:37 pm

I can’t divert.  I am the only taking a stand, posting facts, and kicking your ***.  Wanna see, PP?

Have you answered the question asked?

No.

But I just did.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm

I have already said there is one family.

My response was , So, what’s your point.  This is your diversion.

But not why WE know it is..

Stop lying.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:31 pm

More assertions, in support of your assertions.

Let's focus on what you insist is YOUR citation.

PP,

Thatbis lie.  I posted fact.  You’re busted.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm

But not why WE know it is..

Stop lying.

I don’t give a **** why we know it.  Get to your point.

You to address.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:39 pm

Have you answered the question asked?

No.

But I just did.

Yup.  I have.  You lied, got busted, and are running from your words,

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:40 pm

PP,

Thatbis lie.  I posted fact.  You’re busted.

You posted a series of assertions.

Now stop diverting.

Do you now understand how we can be certain that it is ONE family?
 

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm

Yup.  I have.  You lied, got busted, and are running from your words,

Post your answer to the question asked.


**** cretin.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm

You posted a series of assertions.

Now stop diverting.

Do you now understand how we can be certain that it is ONE family?

No sir.  I posted fact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

You lied. 

The Colt AR 15 was not designed for the battlefield.  Nod.  

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:43 pm

Post your answer to the question asked.

**** cretin.

Lmao!  

1.  There is one family.

2.  I don’t give **** how we know this,

Done.  

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm

You posted a series of assertions.

Now stop diverting.

Do you now understand how we can be certain that it is ONE family?

No sir, I posted fact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

 

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm

Sorry, you lose again.  Here is the link I gave you in the past.  You better scroll past the first few sentences.  I posted facts.  The only one making assertion, false assertions, is you.

en.wikipedia /wiki/List_of_Colt_AR-15_and_M16_rifle_variants

Scroll to down or use the contents links to see the various lists of sub category of the Colt AR 15 and M16 rifles.  

I posted fact.  Told ya so.  You lose ****,

You know that @Blackvegetable  is not going to click the link. Even if he does, he sure as hell isn't going to read anything on it. 

Vegas » 18 Nov 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:46 pm

You know that @Blackvegetable  is not going to click the link. Even if he does, he sure as hell isn't going to read anything on it.

I know he won’t.  He never has.  The citation that he is using will be found at that link.  He has been posting that for a long time.  I gave it to him.  But he never read it.  Now it bit him in the ***.