Liberal Forum

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:48 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:48 pm

I know he won’t.  He never has.  The citation that he is using will be found at that link.  He has been posting that for a long time.  I gave it to him.  But he never read it.  Now it bit him in the ***.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm

Then you got nothing but the rantings of an old man who is losing his mind.

These facts are established:

1. There is one Family of Colt AR weapons with a  multiple categories.

2.  One of the categories is weapons used by the military.

3.  One of the others is for civilian and law enforcement.

4.  There is no weapon on the military list with a selector designation of S-1.

5.  All weapons on the Civilian lost have a selector designation of S-1.

Acknowledge those fact before moving on.

Warcok » 18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:35 pm

VD said Colt is the only one allowed to use the AR platform?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:42 pm

You posted a series of assertions.

Now stop diverting.

Do you now understand how we can be certain that it is ONE family?

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:45 pm

No sir, I posted fact:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... e_variants

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:01 pm

We are working  on the introduction to it.

You are struggling

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:01 pm

We are working  on the introduction to it.

You are struggling

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:13 pm

I’m not.  I waiting for your point.  But you have made some false statements that you need to address since you are so concerned with lying.  

And until you make a point I will continue to beat you over the heads with facts.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 3:52 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 3:52 pm

Here is the direct link to the list of military AR weapons made by Colt.  If those are Assertions start with number 4.  To prove it is an assertion show me the military weapon with a selector of S-1.  

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_C ... ary_models

Note that is the same page as the citation you are using to divert with.

Note that is the same page as the citation you are using to divert with.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:17 pm

Eschew the hollow yapping.

Focus.

Do you understand how we know?

If you don't, we can't proceed.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:21 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:21 pm

How do you do it?

How can I divert with the language of the citation in question?

You're a **** idiot.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 4:23 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:23 pm

You diverted this THREAD with that citation, PP.  to run from your lie I busted you about in another topic.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:22 pm

I have already answered that.  I don’t give a ****.

Do you understand that there is no weapon on the military list with just an S-1 selection?

And do you understand what I posted was fact from the source of the citation you diverted with?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:28 pm

so there is no distinction, with respect to the relationship between the Colt AR-15 and the M-16..

Agreed?

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:24 pm

No...because your notification rule.

**** idiot.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 4:34 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:34 pm

My stand is the Colt AR 15 (SP1) was not designed for the battlefield. Post your stand. I 

Posting a stand does not include a question.

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:35 pm

Sniffle…Sniffle…Snot ubble Burst….Tear….But Huey….

Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 12:20 pm

Then you got nothing but the rantings of an old man who is losing his mind.

These facts are established:

1. There is one Family of Colt AR weapons with a  multiple categories.

2.  One of the categories is weapons used by the military.

3.  One of the others is for civilian and law enforcement.

4.  There is no weapon on the military list with a selector designation of S-1.

5.  All weapons on the Civilian lost have a selector designation of S-1.

Acknowledge those fact before moving on.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:36 pm

My stand is not an unsupported assertion.

It is entirely based upon a set of mutually agreed upon facts culled from what you insist is your citation.

Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 4:36 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Nov 2022, 4:36 pm

The difference being that once you do your part, I'll actually do mine.