Liberal Forum

Selaphobia » 13 Nov 2022, 7:07 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 7:07 pm

is it a gun in pieces?

​​​​Ask @Blackvegetable  …..he is the self described google subject matter expert.

What say you, BV?
 

BV is wearing size 43x at this very moment.


 

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2022, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 3:43 pm

You are pretty bitter about that "how many families" thing.

THERE IT IS!

I GOT you, Huey - you owe me a dollar!

I TOLD you that ***'s first post would not address the OP.








Kidding, people, kidding. 

Did anyone really think huey was stupid enough to take that bet? Hell FUTZ wouldn't have taken that bet!  

Huey » 13 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 3:53 pm

Either that or he is furiously googling to find out what a Glock 43x is.

He's gonna come back with, "I take a 38R."

nuckinfutz » 13 Nov 2022, 6:23 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 6:23 pm

...

Is that the same greg abbot that won re-election? 


Smirk.

DeplorablePatriot » 13 Nov 2022, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 7:36 pm

BV is wearing size 43x at this very moment.

Lol - same direction I took.   
 

Selaphobia » 13 Nov 2022, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 7:49 pm

BV....

Side Note: Huey, this is the one that benches 145 that BV is hot for.

lol!

BV also loves when his partner Kim changes up his drag, pre-rear entry coitus. 


 
 

@Blackvegetable  

What about the muzzle velocity?  

Huey » 13 Nov 2022, 8:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 8:44 pm

@Blackvegetable  

What about the muzzle velocity?

He said that depends on how fast the dog runs. 
 

Huey » 12 Nov 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2022, 9:33 pm

should I get the Glock 43x or not?

@Blackvegetable

  Why not try out a G29.4?
Compact and concealable.
And chambered in the best millimeter.
You can shoot .40 slow and weak.
You can shoot nuclear 10mm.
You can defend against humans.
You can hunt with it.

 
 

Huey » 12 Nov 2022, 9:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Nov 2022, 9:33 pm

should I get the Glock 43x or not?

@Blackvegetable

Since you are Askholio, define "Google gun expert"...

Cannonpointer » 13 Nov 2022, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 7:44 pm

Is that the same greg abbot that won re-election? 

Smirk.

Smirk this!!!! "Knock knock! FBI!"

 
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:34 am

Since you are Askholio, define "Google gun expert"...

The majority of your “knowledge” concerning firearms comes from Google.

Acknowledge you answered.

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 10:19 am

The majority of your “knowledge” concerning firearms comes from Google.

Acknowledge you answered.

I was answered.

Your answer clearly demonstrates that you are a moron.

Google is a platform. It gives me ready access to sources who know much better than you.

My knowledge comes from citations which are credible and consistent.




 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 10:28 am

I was answered.

Your answer clearly demonstrates that you are a moron.

Google is a platform. It gives me ready access to sources who know much better than you.

My knowledge comes from citations which are credible and consistent.

Still no answer.  

Vegas » 13 Nov 2022, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 3:44 pm

I see that calling us "bitter" is your new projection.

He started calling me that years ago...

My happy-go-lucky replies were too much for him...
...layered with remarks that HE is not happy-go-lucky.

Ergo, I am bitter.  

I am way ahead of you on the BlaVe Cry Curve. I boast because he would.    
 

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 10:29 am

Still no answer.

Tiny,

Have you forgotten your Rule of Notifications?

I was dragged into this....I can post about whatever I want.

Acknowledge your rule.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 11:21 am

Tiny,

Have you forgotten your Rule of Notifications?

I was dragged into this....I can post about whatever I want.

Acknowledge your rule.

You should have led with that.  You always do that when your idiocy is exposed.

No problem.  All it shows is you have no practical experience to take part in the discussion.  You admitted as such by responding to the Google Genius answer.  I was correct.  The majority of your firearm knowledge, by your own admission, is from Google searches.

That’s why you can’t tell a gun, in pieces from a Kydex holster.

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 11:26 am

You should have led with that.  You always do that when your idiocy is exposed.

No problem.  All it shows is you have no practical experience to take part in the discussion.  You admitted as such by responding to the Google Genius answer.  I was correct.  The majority of your firearm knowledge, by your own admission, is from Google searches.

That’s why you can’t tell a gun, in pieces from a Kydex holster.
 

 

You should have led with that.

There must be another rule, Controlly

You always do that when your idiocy is exposed.

What, specifically?

No problem.  All it shows is you have no practical experience to take part in the discussion.

What "discussion", Askholio?
No....I have NEVER engaged in a conversation with anyone I know about "holstered weapons". No one I know cares about them. Conversations with my friends cover interesting topics....

You admitted as such by responding to the Google Genius answer.  

No...that was your admission that you are pruriently attracted to children.

**** idiot.

I was correct.

No..you were completely wrong, because there is no such thing...

That's like accusing someone of being a "research expert".....well, DUH!

And on the subject matter discussed, you are CONSISTENTLY wrong.

Because you are a **** idiot.


 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 11:38 am

There must be another rule, Controlly

What, specifically?

What "discussion", Askholio?
No....I have NEVER engaged in a conversation with anyone I know about "holstered weapons". No one I know cares about them. Conversations with my friends cover interesting topics....

No...that was your admission that you are pruriently attracted to children.

**** idiot.

No..you were completely wrong, because there is no such thing...

That's like accusing someone of being a "research expert".....well, DUH!

And on the subject matter discussed, you are CONSISTENTLY wrong.

Because you are a **** idiot.

How often do you discuss holstered weapons…l,so!

that was a piss poor excuse.

No sir, I a, not consistently wrong.  You’re just an idiot who can’t admit he lost.