Variants, read my sig. oh wait, you finally did today. Can’t use that excuse anymore.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 6:53 pm » wrote: ↑ I have....You can't read.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
We've gone over that as well....you are wrong again.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 7:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Variants, read my sig. oh wait, you finally did today. Can’t use that excuse anymore.
I am guessing your stand is the Colt AR 15 Sporter was designed for the battlefield. I can only guess, PP, because you ain’t man enough to take a stand.
Youare not even smart enough to realize you are being curbstomped.
Now, the differences in the lowers please. If you are not enough to post them just say so.
Is the Colt AR-15 SP1 listed as being part of the Colt AR-15 M16 FAMILY of weapons....in the citation you claim to have brought to everyone's attention?Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 7:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope, you haven’t.
If you did you would have posted which military Colt AR had simply am S-1 fire control. You have yet to accomplish that.
Nor have you described the differences in the lower. You have been running from that for months now. But you keep using strike thru, shows your ignorance.
Nope. Until you do the following you are doing nothing but ignorantly ranting.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ We've gone over that as well....you are wrong again.
Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 7:17 pm » wrote: ↑ Is the Colt AR-15 SP1 listed as being part of the Colt AR-15 M16 FAMILY of weapons....in the citation you claim to have brought to everyone's attention?
Already done.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑ post your stand and proof.
the Mustang V6 is listed as being part of the Ford Mustang of cars, As is the Mustang driven in IMSA. Take and a stand and make a point,
No proof.
No...Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 7:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No proof.
Not until you post the difference in lowers. Particularly the differences in the design of the auto sear, bolt carrier, amd trigger assembly.
No. reality and fqcts You have p run from for years in a less than manly fashion. A fashion that would embarrass your father.
@Blackvegetable has no clue what you are talking about, his father would, but not Bv.Selaphobia » 18 Nov 2022, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable this is a fully automatic Bolt Carrier Group.
NOD
Not unless you can offer a citation which confirms it.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 7:47 pm » wrote: ↑ No. reality and fqcts You have p run from for years in a less than manly fashion. A fashion that would embarrass your father.
You have been a pushy, running from questions and facts. Now post the difference isn’t he lowers. Show in the chart FROM MY CITATION, where any military Colt has a selector Function of S-1, or where on the chart any AR 15 semi automatic was ever military issue,
If you can’t do it you prove you are Poppa’s ******, ignorant of the subject matter, and lose by default.
you defaulted. I accept your surrender, and your admission of defeat. See ya later, PP.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Not unless you can offer a citation which confirms it.
Yours contradicts you directly, as demonstrated.
This doesn't require your acknowledgement.
Your arbitrary conditions are irrelevant.Huey » 18 Nov 2022, 8:01 pm » wrote: ↑ you defaulted. I accept your surrender, and your admission of defeat. See ya later, PP.
The record shows you are unable to prove the Colt Sporter Ar 15 was designed for the battlefield nor can you prove that the knock offs you can buy today were designed for the battlefield.
Dont ever bring this subject up again or I will **** curb stomp your ignorant push *** worse than I did today. Your father knew you were a pushy as do I.
Nod, ****.
You don't have to "redesign the weapon" to eliminate full auto mode.Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 6:34 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no need to redesign the weapon to eliminate Full Auto...which is how we wound up with the first Sporters...
Hence "the......design".

Define "Variant"...or shut the **** up.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Nov 2022, 9:30 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't have to "redesign the weapon" to eliminate full auto mode.
Who put that idea into your head...?
THE GIRLS ON THE VIEW...?
Was it maybe a dishonest / fake news journalism piece of **** like Katie Couric...?
Katie Couric slammed for 'deceptive' documentary about gun rights | Fox News
I'm not here to play word games with you.

then hie your ignorant *** outta here, geezer.GHETTOBLASTER » 18 Nov 2022, 10:20 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm not here to play word games with you.
You don't have to "redesign" that weapon any more than I would have to "redesign" a car to go from stick shift to full automatic.
Blackvegetable » 18 Nov 2022, 8:09 pm » wrote: ↑ Your arbitrary conditions are irrelevant.
What matters are facts, regardless of whether or not you acknowledge them.
Read my sig ****…