You look stupid enough when you are wrong...but when you try to play words games to squirm your way out a mess that your stupid mouth got you into...it just makes you look like a child who will never learn.
This is more than a modification. It is a whole new internal design:
Don't.GHETTOBLASTER » 19 Nov 2022, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ You look stupid enough when you are wrong...but when you try to play words games to squirm your way out a mess that your stupid mouth got you into...it just makes you look like a child who will never learn.
New jiggy words...Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ This is more than a modification. It is a whole new internal design:
To prevent a civilian semi-automatic AR-15 from being readily converted for use with the select fire components, several features were changed. Parts changed include the lower receiver, bolt carrier, hammer, trigger, disconnector, and safety/mode selector. The semi-automatic bolt carrier has a longer lightening slot to prevent the bolt's engagement with an automatic sear. Due to a decrease in mass, the buffer spring is heavier. On the select-fire version, the hammer has an extra spur which interacts with the additional auto-sear that holds it back until the bolt carrier group is fully in battery, when the automatic fire is selected.[54] Using a portion of the select fire parts in a semi-automatic rifle will not enable a select fire option (this requires a registered part with the ATF). Lower receivers that are select-fire are identified by a pinhole above the safety/mode selection switch.[55][56][57][58] As designed by Colt the pins supporting the semi-auto trigger and hammer in the lower receiver are larger than those used in the military rifle to prevent interchangeability between semi-automatic and select-fire components.[59]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AR-15_style_rifle#:~:text=As%20of%20September%2019%2C%202019,rifle%20across%20the%20firearms%20industry.
Game. Set. Match.
Nope, not new words. I posted that quite some time ago. Keep ignoring facts. I love watching the ignorant speak on a subject in which they have no knowledge and chose not to learnBlackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ New jiggy words...
"New internal design"...
Whip it good.
Perhaps PP could explain why a weapon that he frantically claims was designed for the battlefield was designed for the battlefield was never used by the military on the battlefield.Selaphobia » 18 Nov 2022, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable this is a fully automatic Bolt Carrier Group.
NOD
@SelaphobiaHuey » 18 Nov 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑That has been my sig for months. Many months. How observant of you.
nah.Selaphobia » 19 Nov 2022, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ time for a family intervention. I will look on Tinder and find his daughters number. Do you have it by chance?
Don’t have the number. Deleted it.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 designHuey » 19 Nov 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Nope, not new words. I posted that quite some time ago. Keep ignoring facts. I love watching the ignorant speak on a subject in which they have no knowledge and chose not to learn
Yes, I am well aware of w hat the article says. What’s your point?Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
That you aren't.Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, I am well aware of w hat the article says. What’s your point?
You're as stupid as ****.Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ @Selaphobia
His memory is awful. He read my sig yesterday (which was changed months ago) which contains the definition of variant. And then hours later he is demanding to be given the definition?
He definitely should look into an assisted living facility.
Not gonna find her in "Man seeking Boys"...Selaphobia » 19 Nov 2022, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Speaking of family, I am looking for your daughters number on Tinder.
I see your argument now is the design never changed. Already posted the design changes. Hell, the final design of the M 16 is not the same design as the Armalite design.
LMAO! So now you are arguing looks.Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ You're as stupid as ****.
"Variant" remains, in this context, a "term of art".
This is immutable, irrespective of your inability to understand it.
Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ I see your argument now is the design never changed. Already posted the design changes. Hell, the final design of the M 16 is not the same design as the Armalite design.
Please explain why there are different lowers, bolt carriers, etc between the Sporter and the M 16 if it is a single design.
No...Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:14 am » wrote: ↑ LMAO! So now you are arguing looks.
You lost this argument ages ago. Even in the art world variant means changes and something different.
sorry, if you can not take a stand and explain yourself here is no need to continue. I accept your surrender.Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ No...it's not about me..
It's about the facts in what you have insisted is a citation you brought to everyone's attention.
Not there, not on Grinder either..