Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:15 am

No...

**** idiot.

Hey, your claim is there is a single design.  You lost that.  

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:17 am

Not there, not on Grinder either..

But you may find yourself.

I demand the exclusive privilege of nominating my own posts....

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:19 am

Hey, your claim is there is a single design.  You lost that.

Tiny,

Your citation.

Rules of Grammar.

Your well recognized issues with singular/plural.

Take the L, loser.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:22 am

Tiny,

Your citation.

Rules of Grammar.

Your well recognized issues with singular/plural.

Take the L, loser.

No, the source lays out the different. Erosions and designs. 

Then I reposted another citation from the same website that lists the design differences.  Since it destroys your single design argument you lined it out.

You lose,

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:22 am

Tiny,

Your citation.

Rules of Grammar.

Your well recognized issues with singular/plural.

Take the L, loser.

Even you are correct, and you are not, you are argument does not apply to any weapon other then Colt. Todays weapons are designed SPECIFICALLY for the civilian market,

You lose.  

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:24 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:24 am

No, the source lays out the different. Erosions and designs. 

Then I reposted another citation from the same website that lists the design differences.  Since it destroys your single design argument you lined it out.

You lose,

the source lays out the different. Erosions and designs. 

No...It makes clear what it is doing in the introduction.

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:28 am

Even you are correct, and you are not, you are argument does not apply to any weapon other then Colt. Todays weapons are designed SPECIFICALLY for the civilian market,

You lose.

Of course....

Something....something....yap..

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:30 am

Of course....

Something....something....yap..

I have given this to you as well in the past:

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7l6YYs2YH

You will find the original certification letter.  Colt brought two different rifles, designed differently.  One for the battlefield and one for Civilian use.  Pay particular attention to the line:

”have changed the weapon in basic design…” 

So no, it was not a singular design.  The Sporter was a different design.

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:39 am

I have given this to you as well in the past:

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7l6YYs2YH

You will find the original certification letter.  Colt brought two different rifles, designed differently.  One for the battlefield and one for Civilian use.  Pay particular attention to the line:

”have changed the weapon in basic design…” 

So no, it was not a singular design.  The Sporter was a different design.

One design.

Don't add the verbiage the citation won't give you.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:41 am

One design.

Don't add the verbiage the citation won't give you.

Even what is now the ATF says your idiot.  Accept your loss.  

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 11:39 am

I have given this to you as well in the past:

Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians

https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7l6YYs2YH

You will find the original certification letter.  Colt brought two different rifles, designed differently.  One for the battlefield and one for Civilian use.  Pay particular attention to the line:

”have changed the weapon in basic design…” 

So no, it was not a singular design.  The Sporter was a different design.

@Selaphobia  

That one post has curbstomped the **** out of PP and his one design argument.  And yet he drones on….

@Blackvegetable  

@Blackvegetable  

Insee your hiding again.  You ran to hide on this thread because I busted you lying on another thread.  No you are running from this thread, the scene of another of your epic defeats, to hide on another thread.

Keep running, 1Design. 

@Blackvegetable  

1Design, there is a change to my sig box you might enjoy,

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:02 pm

@Blackvegetable  

1Design, there is a change to my sig box you might enjoy,

You stopped running to update your sig?

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:05 pm

You stopped running to update your sig?

I’m notrunning.  I am enjoy yet another epic victory, 1Design.
 

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm

@Blackvegetable  

Insee your hiding again.  You ran to hide on this thread because I busted you lying on another thread.  No you are running from this thread, the scene of another of your epic defeats, to hide on another thread.

Keep running, 1Design.

You can't see ****.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

You're running from THIS.


 

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm

I’m notrunning.  I am enjoy yet another epic victory, 1Design.

Over another citation?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:10 pm

Over another citation?

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

“have changed the weapon in basic design….”

Note the words many variations meaning “different”.

Huey » 19 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm

“have changed the weapon in basic design….”

Note the words many variations meaning “different”.

What are the Muzzle Velocities and Ranges of AR-15 s and M16s.

Just the facts.
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Nov 2022, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Nov 2022, 1:14 pm

What are the Muzzle Velocities and Ranges of AR-15 s and M16s.

Just the facts.

”have changed the weapon in basic design…” 

They are not 5 times fast than other rifle.