Nope. Get your daughter to do it.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Nah...
Just more ****.
Just cut&paste it, and repost it...
Then fetch a spork.
Yes....The Issue....again.
nope. No need to surrender. You haven’t posted the answer yet.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ Yes....The Issue....again.
Sure sign of surrender.
Your rules.
The Issue is all the evidence we need.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ nope. No need to surrender. You haven’t posted the answer yet.
if you quote it and use strike thru you lost already.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑ The Issue is all the evidence we need.
Your rule.
You couldn't make it past 10:05 am.
Post it.
You quoted. Do you your own work. And refused. Do your own work, Spoiled Bitch. You lose
No...I have no reason to do any work.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ You quoted. Do you your own work. And refused. Do your own work, Spoiled Bitch. You lose
When you quoted it, lined it out and refused you surrendered. I win.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ No...I have no reason to do any work.
Your challenge is utter ****...
I doubt you've figured out why...
Because it was an unresponsive dodge.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ When you quoted it, lined it out and refused you surrendered. I win.
And no, the challenge is not BS. Multiple designs.
I accept your surrender. Multiple designs. Ask the ATF.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:40 am » wrote: ↑ Because it was an unresponsive dodge.
As is this ****.
It's why post count rises.
And why you must #readhissig
No...wrong....
Only the ATF saying so. And the list of differences I posted from Wiki that your lined out.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑ No...wrong....
No evidence of multiple designs.
Post your "challenge"....we're gonna get this done....again.
The ATF had nothing to do with designing the AR-15.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Only the ATF saying so. And the list of differences I posted from Wiki that your lined out.
I accept your surrender.
work on your terminology. The AR 15 was the Armalite Rifle 15. The Colt SP1, the Colt AR 15, was designed for the civilian and law enforcement market,Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ The ATF had nothing to do with designing the AR-15.
There is only one AR-15 design.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ work on your terminology. The AR 15 was the Armalite Rifle 15. The Colt SP1, the Colt AR 15, was designed for the civilian and law enforcement market,
Read the letter at the link I gave you.
I accept your surrender.
Read my sig.Blackvegetable » 20 Nov 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ There is only one AR-15 design.
There are numerous variants, such as the SP1, hence its inclusion on the list of Variants of the Colt AR-15 M16 family of weapons.
Post it.Huey » 20 Nov 2022, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ Read my sig.
If there is only one design take the challenge.
It is an embedded PDF in the article. You have the link.
So I have work to do?