Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑What the ATF certification said and what the DOD said. The NFA of 1934 defines weapons like the M16 as "machineguns".Huey » 21 Nov 2022, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 21 Nov 2022, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑ Says absolutely nothing about discreet design.
One day at the NHTSA...
"Good morning.....we've come to establish the safety of our new car, the Vega."
"Did you bring a Space Shuttle, to demonstrate that this "Vega" is not a Space Shuttle?"
"No, but we did bring a DVD of "The Poseidon Adventure - The Director's Cut".....It's blu-ray."
"Cool....I'll write a letter."what the ATF said:
have changed the weapon in basic design to the extent that it is not a firearm in the machine category…”
According to the DOD:
- Semi-automatic-only rifles like the Colt AR-15 are not assault rifles; they do not have select-fire capabilities.
Title of the Article:
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for CiviliansDetuned? LMAO! It is like taking a 351 V8 with a 4 barrel and replacing it with a Volkswagen engine. Enough of your stupid ****.Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑Read more: https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7lOpSHNM2
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
He and Savage also cleared up a point of potential confusion on why the classification letter refers to the AR-15 as an “automatic rifle.”**** cretin“It is because (my thoughts) that they sent two rifles,” Stamboulieh offered. “One was an automatic rifle, and the other was the modified rifle made to be not a machinegun (a semi-automatic version).
and the other was the modified rifle made to be not a machinegun (a semi-automatic version).Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ What the ATF certification said and what the DOD. The NFA of 1934 defines weapons like the M16 as "machinegun.
Title of the Article:
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
Detuned? LMAO! It is like taking a 351 V8 with a 4 barrel and replacing it with a Volkswagen engine. Enough of your stupid ****.
Says the guy who never seen either, let alone fire them.Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑ and the other was the modified rifle made to be not a machinegun (a semi-automatic version).
Says your citation, stupid little ****.Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Says the guy who never seen either, let alone fire them.
That’s nice. Not for the battle field.
I posted the words from my citation. You know, the ATF letter. And the portion you posted says it was a semiautomatic. DOD does not classify semi autos as assault weapons.
Irrelevant.Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑ I posted the words from my citation. You know, the ATF letter. And the portion you posted says it was a semiautomatic. DOD does not classify semi autos as assault weapons.
GAME. SET. **** match!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, my citation, and the ATF letter, say it is not a machine gun.
Please shut the **** up.Selaphobia » 22 Nov 2022, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑ "machinegun" ?
https://www.ammoland.com/2021/12/origin ... z7lOpSHNM2
Definitive proof the AR-15 was never and was never meant to be a “weapon of war.”
So what?Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 6:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes, my citation, and the ATF letter, say it is not a machine gun.
they Say it was a semi auto, designed for civilians.
I am glad you agree with the article titled:
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
It is great you are catching on. Your Welcome.
Lmao! No, the citation says not. Civilians can’t own assault rifles. Assault rifles by definition of the US government are not semi automatic.Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ So what?
It wasn't designed to be a machine gun.
It was designed to be an assault rifle. Then it was modified so as not to be a machine gun.
**** idiot.
Lmao!Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ So what?
It wasn't designed to be a machine gun.
It was designed to be an assault rifle. Then it was modified so as not to be a machine gun.
**** idiot.
@BlackvegetableHuey » 20 Nov 2022, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable I forgot to tag you in on this:
Just to educate you on what we are talking about:
26 U.S. Code § 5845 - Definitions
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/5845
That contains terminology used by the FED Gov to classify weapons and parts as NFA weapons. You will not find a definition for automatic or assault rifle. Because they are classified as machine guns.
b)MachinegunThe term “machinegun” means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger. The term shall also include the frame or receiver of any such weapon, any part designed and intended solely and exclusively, or combination of parts designed and intended, for use in converting a weapon into a machinegun, and any combination of parts from which a machinegun can be assembled if such parts are in the possession or under the control of a person.
Tiny,Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Lmao! No, the citation says not. Civilians can’t own assault rifles. Assault rifles by definition of the US government are not semi automatic.
And again you fail to grasp simple concepts as explained to you a few times. In the eyes of the US government, thru the NFA of 1934, and to this day, an AUTOMATIC RIFLE is classified a machine gun.
Keep playing word games.
Title of the article:
Original ATF AR-15 Classification Refutes Claim that Rifle ‘Not Meant’ for Civilians
And you agreed.
Stop drawing my attention to more **** from which you will end up running.Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 6:45 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
How did the M16 operate? Just like that:
means any weapon which shoots, is designed to shoot, or can be readily restored to shoot, automatically more than one shot, without manual reloading, by a single function of the trigger.
Doing where?
I have no need to run. I understand the topic.Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop drawing my attention to more **** from which you will end up running.
This is tedious.
Then answer the question.Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no need to run. I understand the topic.
I’ll check tomorrow to see what nuggets of fun you drop.
This is a blast.
"No need to run"....Huey » 22 Nov 2022, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no need to run. I understand the topic.
I’ll check tomorrow to see what nuggets of fun you drop.
This is a blast.
I’m still here, ignorant one.Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 6:56 pm » wrote: ↑ Stop drawing my attention to more **** from which you will end up running.
This is tedious.