Liberal Forum

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 7:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 7:59 pm

I’m good.  No issues here.   The record I posted is much clearer then your narrative rantings.

You have an issue recalling what you defined as The Issue.

The record I posted is much clearer then your narrative rantings.

the answer to the question "How many families?" is a number.

The answer to the question "How many have done so?" is also a number.

Nod, Thicker than ****.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:03 pm

You have an issue recalling what you defined as The Issue.

the answer to the question "How many families?" is a number.

The answer to the question "How many have done so?" is also a number.

Nod, Thicker than ****.

You have been answered.  Next time you are asked to specify exactly what you are referring to it will behoove you to do so.

Now either refute my answer, specify, or never ask again. Nod.

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:05 pm

You have been answered. Next time you are asked to specify exactly what you are referring to it will behoove you to do so.

Now either refute my answer, specify, or never ask again. Nod.

Acknowledge that you're a **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:13 pm

Acknowledge that you're a **** idiot.

I see you are still running away.  Almost as fast as you were prepared to run to Canada.

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 8:17 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:17 pm

I see you are still running away.  Almost as fast as you were prepared to run to Canada.

You were asked "how many" on 2 occasions..

You became confused.
 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:19 pm

You were asked "how many" on 2 occasions..

You became confused.

Many.  There was a whole thread dedicated to it well before you disgraced this forum.  @Cannonpointer  

CP, you remeber that thread AL started where many of us posted our pics?

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 7:38 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 7:38 pm

But there was no cheating.

So you won't call it racist to end emergency mail in voting provisions. Got you on record.
 

Neo » 14 Nov 2022, 8:30 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:30 pm

So you won't call it racist to end emergency mail in voting provisions. Got you on record.

If it works, why would we need to do so?


Other than because Worse Than Buchanan lost...
 

Huey » 14 Nov 2022, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:21 pm

Many.  There was a whole thread dedicated to it well before you disgraced this forum.  @Cannonpointer  

CP, you remeber that thread AL started where many of us posted our pics?

I do - but as my semi-literate younger brother once famously intoned, "only vividly."


He meant vaguely, if my uncertainty isn't incorrectly unremembered. 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 8:32 pm

If it works, why would we need to do so?

Other than because Worse Than Buchanan lost...

Because you **** are cheating. If the wins are legitimate surely removing the emergency mail in voting months should be of no concern. 
 

Neo » 14 Nov 2022, 9:44 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 9:44 pm

Because you **** are cheating. If the wins are legitimate surely removing the emergency mail in voting months should be of no concern.

But they are legitimate.....and if Americans want it, Treasonous 5th Columnist Scum shouldn't be allowed to stand in their way.

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 10:13 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 10:13 pm

But they are legitimate.....and if Americans want it, Treasonous 5th Columnist Scum shouldn't be allowed to stand in their way.

Your betters established election DAY. They didn't extend it for wars or disease. Colorado was red before mail in voting. Remained purple for a few years after its implementation. It's now reliably blue. National elections should require in person voting on election day with valid identification unless the individual voter has a compelling exception. 
 

Neo » 15 Nov 2022, 3:04 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 3:04 am

Your betters established election DAY. They didn't extend it for wars or disease. Colorado was red before mail in voting. Remained purple for a few years after its implementation. It's now reliably blue. National elections should require in person voting on election day with valid identification unless the individual voter has a compelling exception.
 

 

Colorado was red before mail in voting. Remained purple for a few years after its implementation. It's now reliably blue.

That has nothing to do with mail in voting......

National elections should require in person voting on election day with valid identification unless the individual voter has a compelling exception.

There's no need.....we want Americans engaged, and should make it easier, not harder, to vote.

Yes, this might put Stupid at a disadvantage, but it is time to stop enabling it....

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 8:10 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:10 am

That has nothing to do with mail in voting......

There's no need.....we want Americans engaged, and should make it easier, not harder, to vote.

Yes, this might put Stupid at a disadvantage, but it is time to stop enabling it....

Apparently mail in voting captures the political will of the ignorant, the misinformed, the gullible and the lazy. Not to mention it opens the system up to fraud and manipulation. The argument has long been those living under stolen identities wouldn't dare show up to a polling place on election day. These were arguments forwarded by liberals to explain how cartel beholden illegal aliens with stolen identities, some 15 million of them, wouldn't impact elections. I agree with them. Now that ballots are chasing them to their homes this security check is no longer in place. 

Election DAY, proper identification, I'm person. Exceptions made for active military and those with serious medical conditions that prevent attendance. 
 

Neo » 15 Nov 2022, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:25 am

Apparently mail in voting captures the political will of the ignorant, the misinformed, the gullible and the lazy. Not to mention it opens the system up to fraud and manipulation. The argument has long been those living under stolen identities wouldn't dare show up to a polling place on election day. These were arguments forwarded by liberals to explain how cartel beholden illegal aliens with stolen identities, some 15 million of them, wouldn't impact elections. I agree with them. Now that ballots are chasing them to their homes this security check is no longer in place. 

Election DAY, proper identification, I'm person. Exceptions made for active military and those with serious medical conditions that prevent attendance.

Apparently mail in voting captures the political will of the ignorant, the misinformed, the gullible and the lazy

Neo,

it takes little effort to demonstrate that "the ignorant, the misinformed, the gullible and the lazy" is you.

 

Blackvegetable » 14 Nov 2022, 7:39 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Nov 2022, 7:39 pm

Your old lady sucks mine, Naffy...

Do you actually know what yours is?....you're a leftist after all...and a dickhead

nefarious101 » 15 Nov 2022, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:52 am

Do you actually know what yours is?....you're a leftist after all...and a dickhead

Let's agree to keep family out of this, Naffy...

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 8:36 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 8:36 am

Neo,

it takes little effort to demonstrate that "the ignorant, the misinformed, the gullible and the lazy" is you.

Your mother. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Nov 2022, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

15 Nov 2022, 9:56 am

Let's agree to keep family out of this, Naffy...

Oh...family is just another sore spot for ya is it?......I'm sure it's no secret among them that you are a dickhead

Blackvegetable » 13 Nov 2022, 10:36 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Nov 2022, 10:36 pm

Republicans’ inability to translate an unpopular Democratic president and unsettled economic climate into a clear electoral advantage suggests that the party was burdened by a tarnished national reputation.

Voters who expressed dissatisfaction with the condition of the nation under Democratic rule didn’t necessarily believe that Republicans offered better solutions to their problems. It’s very possible that the GOP’s current emphasis on cultural populism left it with less credibility to address Americans’ economic concerns.

https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... f=lMtIv2Vb

http://https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=61775

How does he do it? Who knows? But we hate him.......

The Prescience.....he's so remarkable.