Liberal Forum

Following the election I have heard a lot of murmurs about redistricting and maps etc. This is popular on npr, for example https://www.npr.org/2022/10/18/11262878 ... n-american

Now...the average Democrat will look at stories like this and conclude 'yeah, white people are racist' and think no more about it. 

But alas. I was cursed with the inconvenience of having greater intelligence than a walnut. So when i see a story like this i cannot help but think: "okay, you admit that the voting process is nothing more than a racial headcount. It isn't about ideas it is just about the demographics of the people voting. Does not that very admission prove that all the foundational principles of the modern usa are simply ****? That this is not a legitimate country?"

you see...when it is useful for non whites, the democrat party is always willing to admit that ideas cannot be sovereign...only people can be sovereign. If demographics matter at all, then this blatantly contradicts the idea that we are a 'proposition nation'...that is just a bs term that some people like to say but few people really believe...and NOBODY behaves as if this is the case. Whatever absurd philosophy people pretend to have.. the facts clearly show that blood is thicker than water. People will be more loyal to their family and their ethnic group than they will be to any principles. 

Jews will be loyal to jews. Blacks to blacks. Mesizo to mestizo. Chinese to Chinese. Etc. And the foolish whites who are not loyal to whites simply wont last more than a generation or two...lacking the ability or the motive to reproduce. 

So...how can 'democrats' hold such contradicting ideas in their brain at the same time? They seem to understand that districting around race is a thing that matters.. yet they also vomit rhetoric about "our democracy"...as if we have one...or as if such a thing could ever be possible without ethnic homogeneity?
 
 

(((Chuck Schumer))), celebrating the Senate majority, made an announcement that we need to give full amnesty to all brown people...because white people simply do notbreproduce anymore.

That is a fascinating admission.

If anyone '**** loves science' then they should understand that the human being is a biological life form. We are not economic units...nor are we fundamentally citizens. We are apes.

And as such the natural law demands that our thriving is measured in reproductive fitness.

Once upon a time...not so long ago...north America was a baby factory...the seed of the once mighty anglo american subspecies was exploding since the founding of North America.

What changed? Why is the usa now a place for white people to just go extinct? Well.. a lot. But firstly it should be noted that such a state of affairs proves the state itself is a dismal failure. Whatever the reason for this turn around. Our society has failed at its most critical function, and chick Schumer both admits and celebrates this fact.

Illegal Aliens count for Congressional and EC apportionment .
Democrats [THE GIBS MUH DAT PARTY] are working to give Illegal Aliens and Felons the vote.

I see white people being encouraged to accept interracial marriage and mixed race children more than them being violently eliminated.

Either situation can of course spell doom for a group of purely white people.

But race mixing doesn't seem like extinction to me. If every white married a black and had mulatto babies, then within two generations, "white people " would literally be gone.

But their genes would live on in those mixed race kids. How is that extinction?

SJConspirator » 17 Nov 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 11:37 am

I see white people being encouraged to accept interracial marriage and mixed race children more than them being violently eliminated.

Either situation can of course spell doom for a group of purely white people.

But race mixing doesn't seem like extinction to me. If every white married a black and had mulatto babies, then within two generations, "white people " would literally be gone.

But their genes would live on in those mixed race kids. How is that extinction?

A single gene does not create a life form. Europeans share some genes with neanderthals...but Neanderthals are indeed extinct. And it will always be a mystery to us how intelligent they were...what sort of culture they had.. what they might have become over time if they were not driven to extinction. 

there is a concept, also, known as outbreeding depression. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outbreeding_depression

It can take centuries to perfectly fine tune a gene pool under selective pressure to adapt to...and thrive in...a particular habitat. A habitat can be environmental...but it can also be your society...as obviously culture and law etc can impact the reproductive fitness of individuals. 

Race mixing breaks down all those adaptations. It creates genetic chaos and a human being that is simply less adapted to anything in particular. 
 
Whether this is "good" or "bad" naturally depends on whatever things you value. But the outcome cannot be denied. If you fail to maintain the pedigree of thoroughbred horses, for example, by mixing their gene pool with other horses too much, then racing performance will obviously suffer

SJConspirator » 17 Nov 2022, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 11:37 am

I see white people being encouraged to accept interracial marriage and mixed race children more than them being violently eliminated.

Either situation can of course spell doom for a group of purely white people.

But race mixing doesn't seem like extinction to me. If every white married a black and had mulatto babies, then within two generations, "white people " would literally be gone.

But their genes would live on in those mixed race kids. How is that extinction?

It took tens of thousands of years worth of selective breeding to come up with the people who eventually evolved to populate the list of most notable inventors and fathers of all scientific fields.
It is no accident that  the people on these lists are predominantly Caucasian.
Given enough time race mixing would happen whether it is being actively promoted or not by [[[THE NWO CHOSEN]]]
This doesn't mean we should turn a blind eye to their motives.


 
 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Nov 2022, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 11:53 am

It took tens of thousands of years worth of selective breeding to come up with the people who eventually evolved to populate the list of most notable inventors and fathers of all scientific fields.
It is no accident that  the people on these lists are predominantly Caucasian.
Given enough time race mixing would happen whether it is being actively promoted or not by [[[THE NWO CHOSEN]]]
This doesn't mean we should turn a blind eye to their motives.

I actually disagree a bit with your timeline.. it's a trivial objection but worth mentioning. 

It does not take thousands of years to evolve a society that has a talent for innovation. It takes a few hundred.

This is supported by the historical record.

The cycle of dark ages to golden ages is pretty consistent among human pooulations...and they tend to be separated by 500 years or so. 

But this very cycle can be made worse by the genetic confusion caused by mass immigration. 

I find it amusing that I have.. with very clear and simple rational argument...refuted the ideology of most people on this forum and indeed the very foundation of this country...yet I doubt anyone here can show me any flaw in my reasoning.

I mean...that should be a pretty big deal.

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 11:18 am

Jews will be loyal to jews. Blacks to blacks. Mesizo to mestizo. Chinese to Chinese. Etc. And the foolish whites who are not loyal to whites simply wont last more than a generation or two...lacking the ability or the motive to reproduce. 

So...how can 'democrats' hold such contradicting ideas in their brain at the same time? They seem to understand that districting around race is a thing that matters.. yet they also vomit rhetoric about "our democracy"...as if we have one...or as if such a thing could ever be possible without ethnic homogeneity?

I have always maintained this. It isn't racists either. It's not. Humans are drawn to their own kind, that's just nature. It makes sense. Asians walk around in groups together, as do Mexicans, blacks, Jews, and whites. None of that is bigotry or racist. It's nature. It's the same thing for the rest of the animal kingdom and even insects. Ants, for example, have more than 12,000 species. Each specie has their own colony that doesn't mix with the other species. Yet, they are still all ants. Nature made humans the same way. It doesn't mean we all have to hate each other, or even love each other. It's evolution. 

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm

I have always maintained this. It isn't racists either. It's not. Humans are drawn to their own kind, that's just nature. It makes sense. Asians walk around in groups together, as do Mexicans, blacks, Jews, and whites. None of that is bigotry or racist. It's nature. It's the same thing for the rest of the animal kingdom and even insects. Ants, for example, have more than 12,000 species. Each specie has their own colony that doesn't mix with the other species. Yet, they are still all ants. Nature made humans the same way. It doesn't mean we all have to hate each other, or even love each other. It's evolution.

well...its GOING to be called racist lol. And i just shrug at that. If observing facts about human nature is racist then it is simply ignorant, by definition, to not be racist. 

i do not see how anything can be ethical about denying reality.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:16 pm

well...its GOING to be called racist lol. And i just shrug at that. If observing facts about human nature is racist then it is simply ignorant, by definition, to not be racist. 

i do not see how anything can be ethical about denying reality.

youtube /watch?v=HqiWFLsgVi4

Votes. That's what it has always been about. The dims falsely accuse anyone who isn't on their side as racist. Thereby, getting the minority vote. They have been doing this for decades. It works.

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:19 pm

Votes. That's what it has always been about. The dims falsely accuse anyone who isn't on their side as racist. Thereby, getting the minority vote. They have been doing this for decades. It works.

well...like i said. If 'democracy' is not about some competition of ideas and the success of the best ideas...then democracy is quite stupid.

As i have said before, i do not believe that the conflict between republicans and democrats is real./ They are both ultimately conspiring against us. But that is another matter.

the obvious corollary to race in the USA translating to votes is that democracy simply cannot function.


and 'true believer' in democracy must also argue that being a minority anywhere CANNOT MATTER...because its all about convincing people of the best ideas. Right?

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:21 pm

well...like i said. If 'democracy' is not about some competition of ideas and the success of the best ideas...then democracy is quite stupid.

As i have said before, i do not believe that the conflict between republicans and democrats is real./ They are both ultimately conspiring against us. But that is another matter.

the obvious corollary to race in the USA translating to votes is that democracy simply cannot function.

and 'true believer' in democracy must also argue that being a minority anywhere CANNOT MATTER...because its all about convincing people of the best ideas. Right?

True, but democracy can be considered the least worst idea. The alternatives aren't better. 

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 12:02 pm

I actually disagree a bit with your timeline.. it's a trivial objection but worth mentioning. 

It does not take thousands of years to evolve a society that has a talent for innovation. It takes a few hundred.

This is supported by the historical record.

The cycle of dark ages to golden ages is pretty consistent among human pooulations...and they tend to be separated by 500 years or so. 

But this very cycle can be made worse by the genetic confusion caused by mass immigration.

It took tens of thousands of years worth of evolution to create a  race that was heavily based on  the ability to convey complex / abstract ideas / forward thinking ability  and earned mutual trust / altruistic behavior as vital survival traits ...
This Innovative Society also required  a well evolved ability to RECORD HISTORICAL FINDINGS so that subsequent generations could build upon prior advances. 

I THINK IT TOOK TENS OF THOUSANDS OF YEARS TO GO FROM AFRICAN BUSHMAN TO ARCHIMEDES

 
 

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:24 pm

True, but democracy can be considered the least worst idea. The alternatives aren't better.

from the point of view of reproductive fitness lol...monarchy and fascism were FAR superior. I mean...what is your goal when you decide what works? Democracy seems excellent at making people go extinct.

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:27 pm

from the point of view of reproductive fitness lol...monarchy and fascism were FAR superior. I mean...what is your goal when you decide what works? Democracy seems excellent at making people go extinct.

Some people need to go extinct. 

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Nov 2022, 1:24 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:24 pm

It took tens of thousands of years worth of evolution to create a  race that was heavily based on  the ability to convey complex / abstract ideas / forward thinking ability  and earned mutual trust / altruistic behavior as vital survival traits ...
This Innovative Society also required  a well evolved ability to RECORD HISTORICAL FINDINGS so that subsequent generations could build upon prior advances. 

every race of people does display these characteristics, more or less. Because this is universal to the survival strategy of human beings. 

the white race evolved in a very inhospitable and cold environment. and we have various adaptations to that environment...which you could say took thousands of years. Blonde hair took thousands of years. white skin. lactose tolerance. stuff like that, say. 

but we have not always been great innovators. In 600 AD, northern europeans were relatively primitive. That was the result of the dysgenic collapse of the roman empire...just like we today are having a dysgenic collapse. But one thousand years later, the Europeans rivaled and even exceeded the innovation of the classical era. 

FOS » 17 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm

every race of people does display these characteristics, more or less. Because this is universal to the survival strategy of human beings. 

the white race evolved in a very inhospitable and cold environment. and we have various adaptations to that environment...which you could say took thousands of years. Blonde hair took thousands of years. white skin. lactose tolerance. stuff like that, say. 

but we have not always been great innovators. In 600 AD, northern europeans were relatively primitive. That was the result of the dysgenic collapse of the roman empire...just like we today are having a dysgenic collapse. But one thousand years later, the Europeans rivaled and even exceeded the innovation of the classical era.

African Bushmen..predate the rest of Mankind by 50,000 years.

Vegas » 17 Nov 2022, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:29 pm

Some people need to go extinct.

i prefer that the various races of man maintain their ecological niche, but perhaps be improved. Just as we can find use for the various breeds of horses and dogs etc. Diversity is, in fact, useful. if a certain race begins to get too stupid or something, that can be fixed (and that idealistic goal was one of the 'terrible' policies of the national socialists)

GHETTOBLASTER » 17 Nov 2022, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Nov 2022, 1:37 pm

African Bushmen..predate the rest of Mankind by 50,000 years.

evolution inevitably occurs...even if it is merely via genetic drift. Without question the genetics of modern san bushmen are a bit different from whatever they were 50k years ago. And all of the various branches of humans have altered over time. Some things change, and some do not.