Skans » 23 Nov 2022, 11:52 am » wrote: ↑
Here's the deal. You are here trying to convince others 1) not to get the vaccine and/or 2) if you have gotten the vaccine you are medically screwed. All I am saying is that I've been vaxed 4x and have had no problems. I think it helped me not get the original covid, but have no way of knowing that for sure.
As for what
other people do, either getting vaxed or not getting vaxed - I really care about that as much as what brand of tampon some teenage girl uses. What I really can't figure out is why you give a **** about what other people do medically?
I don't give a hoot what people choose to do. They will live with the consequence of that choice whether it be about delaying treatment, vaccines or boosters. My purpose is to help people understand the importance of early treatment, as well as the risk VS benefit equation that Big Pharma's propaganda arms - the U.S. government and fellow profiteers in media and Big Tech - censored folks away from seeing.
Vaccine RISK VS BENEFIT - Pragmatism (absurdly, "hesitant") VS blind obedience
Perhaps even to a forum lurker that just found their way here today. To provide additional tools to allow them to
make a more fully informed decision as to whether they should get the clot shot or a booster, as opposed to government and vaccine center's violation of the Nuremberg Code.
Are vaccine recipients being fully informed that they are part of an experiment?
"
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.