I hear that..
You are a goddamn LIAR!!! Water can be toxic in high enough doses. Ivermectin has been given safely BILLIONS of times.IkeBana » 21 Nov 2022, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Cedar confirms that he can't provide a legitimate study.
What's a "benis"?
There was one covid/ivermectin study. It was an in-vitro study which showed ivermectin having some negative effect on the structure of the SARS COVE 2 virus...at 25 times the toxic level in humans.
I just did when Buffalo provided a credible link. I do it all the time. I have no problems admitting when I BELIEVE I am wrong. Not the same as admitting I'm wrong when its convenient for others.Skans » 21 Nov 2022, 10:55 am » wrote: ↑ Don't call others "narcissistic" when you can't even admit when you are wrong.
Learn to read, you dumb ****.Buffalo » 21 Nov 2022, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You are a goddamn LIAR!!! Water can be toxic in high enough doses. Ivermectin has been given safely BILLIONS of times.
What is the toxicity level for the mRNA vax? How many people have died as a direct result of the vax vs Ivermectin? My doctor and I were arguing about the efficacy of Ivermectin. He told me he had 8 patients die with the communist/fauci flu that took Ivermectin. I asked him how many patients of his died from the communist/fauci flu after being vaxxed and boosted. He didn't answer me.
But you can live on in your **** ignorance, idiot!!!
**** OFF, ***!!!
Ok...don't...
Another lie. You really can't help it can you. You've been beaten down with this over and over for months and are only just now tacitly admitting to your chronic stupidity.ScottMon » 21 Nov 2022, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑ Buffalo beat you to it. He used a credible source too. Now don't you have some other people to impose your narcissistic personality disorder on?
What part of "You are full of ****..." do you not understand?freeman » 21 Nov 2022, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Another lie. You really can't help it can you. You've been beaten down with this over and over for months and are only just now tacitly admitting to your chronic stupidity.
Here's one where I handed you your *** on the same subject on the 3rd of February 2022:
viewtopic.php?p=1935342#p1935342
You aptly predicted where ScotMonster would go, as she demonstrated within just a few posts!Selaphobia » 21 Nov 2022, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ It takes proof, over and over and over, and reluctantly, after beaten down like rabid animal, you say that you made a mistake.
But deep down inside, you don't believe you are wrong, and you go down the same path again.
There aren’t any.ScottMon » 20 Nov 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me a peer review that explicitly states that Ivermectin works.
No, that's reliability.ScottMon » 20 Nov 2022, 6:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Peer review is simply a matter of duplicating the results found elsewhere.
Buffalo » 20 Nov 2022, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑ Data were sourced from published peer-reviewed studies, manuscripts posted to preprint servers, expert meta-analyses, and numerous epidemiological analyses of regions with ivermectin distribution campaigns.
Therapeutic Advances:
A large majority of randomized and observational controlled trials of ivermectin are reporting repeated, large magnitude improvements in clinical outcomes. Numerous prophylaxis trials demonstrate that regular ivermectin use leads to large reductions in transmission. Multiple, large “natural experiments” occurred in regions that initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns followed by tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates compared with nearby regions without such campaigns.
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8088823/
**** YOU!!!
Bruce » 22 Sep 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑ There aren’t any.
Trumptards are short bus stupid bastards who deny the scientific method.
There are plenty. You would know this if you didn’t rely exclusively on propaganda for “news.”Bruce » 22 Sep 2023, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑There aren’t any.ScottMon » 20 Nov 2022, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me a peer review that explicitly states that Ivermectin works.