Liberal Forum

DeezerShoove » 22 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm

I'm a bit disappointed in your continued quest against merely exposing the truth.
If she legitimately lost then why would you be afraid of that being exposed?

Instead you make some absurd comparison like this...

Good point Deez.  If Misty were truly confident then why waste her time arguing the point.   

Misty » 22 Nov 2022, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 10:00 am

Kari Lake is the Hiroo Onoda of the 2022 elections.

This literally has nothing to do with the OP. But I understand how you lefties need to deflect. The truth usually makes you all pretty sad. 

DeezerShoove » 22 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 12:10 pm

I'm a bit disappointed in your continued quest against merely exposing the truth.
If she legitimately lost then why would you be afraid of that being exposed?

Instead you make some absurd comparison like this...

Why is that election different from the numerous others across the country?

Someone won, someone lost.

There aren't even grounds for suspicion of a mystery.
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm

Why is that election different from the numerous others across the country?

Someone won, someone lost.

There aren't even grounds for suspicion of a mystery.

No questions, dick sucker.

https://i.imgflip.com/6yjej4.jpg
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 10:15 am

Road should join @Vegas  in a Double Mishima.

ROAD  and VEGAS joined at the rectum! Without a stop valve!      
Like an open, running sewer!  
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 12:58 pm

Why is that election different from the numerous others across the country?

Someone won, someone lost.

There aren't even grounds for suspicion of a mystery.

You really aren't paying attention.

1% difference in reported "results" determining a victor...but
7% of votes are in contention in one county alone.
If those are sorted out they could flip that 1% margin the other way very easily.

THAT is what you fear. Not an honest election, but a legitimate loss.

DeezerShoove » 22 Nov 2022, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:24 pm

You really aren't paying attention.

1% difference in reported "results" determining a victor...but
7% of votes are in contention in one county alone.
If those are sorted out they could flip that 1% margin the other way very easily.

THAT is what you fear. Not an honest election, but a legitimate loss.

1) I have no faith in your math

2) Define "in contention".
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:27 pm

1) I have no faith in your math

2) Define "in contention".

1) Do skewed samples have an effect on its population stat? You are the last person to bitch about someone else's math. 

2) **** this safe space of yours. Define it yourself. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:27 pm

1) I have no faith in your math

2) Define "in contention".

You got an answer.

Now go get ****, you sniveling piece of ****.

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:31 pm

1) Do skewed samples have an effect on its population stat? You are the last person to bitch about someone else's math. 

2) **** this safe space of yours. Define it yourself.

Yes.....that's why the conclusion of the sample of Republicans and conservatives is less reliable than the conclusion of the entire population surveyed.

Acknowledge that you've been answered.....again.

 

DeezerShoove » 22 Nov 2022, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:35 pm

You got an answer.

Now go get ****, you sniveling piece of ****.

Just sayin'

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:38 pm

Just sayin'

Thanx for citing Fox News earlier.      

"Media can no longer 'avoid' Hunter Biden laptop reality"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Op6t9QnkT-I
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm

Yes.....that's why the conclusion of the sample of Republicans and conservatives is less reliable than the conclusion of the entire population surveyed.

Acknowledge that you've been answered.....again.

Oh, now you are shifting to another poll. After I demolished with your stupid article about Trump ranking last. You didn't seem to have a problem with that skewed sample, yet you have a problem with this one ^^^. 

You stupid mother ****. Your desperation is so blatant and pathetic. 

And acknowledge that you didn't answer the first time around, as always. 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 2:38 pm

Just sayin'

If you weren't so **** lazy and ****, you wouldn't freak out about every little thing.
The truth wouldn't be so scary for you snowflake ****.

As I have said before, let the investigations prove which ones are liars.
Instead you Fearful Ones must stand strong...
Just in case you lost, ****.

DeezerShoove » 22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm

If you weren't so **** lazy and ****, you wouldn't freak out about every little thing.
The truth wouldn't be so scary for you snowflake ****.

As I have said before, let the investigations prove which ones are liars.
Instead you Fearful Ones must stand strong...
Just in case you lost, ****.

The dems know they have engaged in voter fraud...if not they would demand an investigation so they could score political point.  

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm

Oh, now you are shifting to another poll. After I demolished with your stupid article about Trump ranking last. You didn't seem to have a problem with that skewed sample, yet you have a problem with this one ^^^. 

You stupid mother ****. Your desperation is so blatant and pathetic. 

And acknowledge that you didn't answer the first time around, as always.

Bv dances like a chicken on a hot grill in a carnival.   

roadkill » 22 Nov 2022, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:13 pm

Bv dances like a chicken on a hot grill in a carnival.

Always does. He is currently thinking of a way to evade right now. 

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 3:15 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:15 pm

Always does. He is currently thinking of a way to evade right now.

Yep.   lol

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:02 pm

Oh, now you are shifting to another poll. After I demolished with your stupid article about Trump ranking last. You didn't seem to have a problem with that skewed sample, yet you have a problem with this one ^^^. 

You stupid mother ****. Your desperation is so blatant and pathetic. 

And acknowledge that you didn't answer the first time around, as always.

No, I'm not, ******* bitch.

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 3:19 pm

No, I'm not, ******* bitch.

Oh, well...you got me there. 

@roadkill  he can't dance around and evade, as always, so this is what he comes up with. ^^^