Liberal Forum

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:26 pm

I already went through this. You crossed it all out. I am not repeating it. 

Survivorship bias = death of presidents...        

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:24 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:24 pm

**** your demands. You know it. I know that you know, so **** off. Coward.

Since when have I ever fallen for your games?

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:28 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:28 pm

Lying coward.

Kill yourself

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:27 pm

No, you didn't. 

You're an idiot.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:29 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:29 pm

You crossed it out, thus you wouldn't know. 

Not my problem.

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:26 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:26 pm

In this context, it would have to.

You can stop bluffing. 

You're a moron.

What is the Survivorship Bias?Survivorship bias is a cognitive shortcut that occurs when a visible successful subgroup is mistaken as an entire group, due to the failure subgroup not being visible. The bias’ name comes from the error an individual makes when a data set only considers the “surviving” observations, without considering those which didn’t survive.1 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:31 pm

Survivorship bias does not apply, **** parking valet.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:31 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:31 pm

   
You **** moron. "survive" is not meant literally you idiot. 

https://thedecisionlab.com/biases/survivorship-bias

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:32 pm

You crossed out my evidence. Thus, you have no ground to stand on. 

Kill yourself.

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:34 pm

You're a moron, Vag.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:33 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:33 pm

In a survey of 44 presidents, who is the "invisible subgroup"?

**** idiot.

Yes.....that's why the conclusion of the sample of Republicans and conservatives is less reliable than the conclusion of the entire population surveyed.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:35 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:35 pm

Oh, well you got me there. No evidence, once again.

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm

We are talking about the **** poll and this comment of yours. Keep up!

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm

Stop evading.

Invisible subgroup.

NOW.

In a recent survey, nearly 200 political science scholars ranked US presidents on a scale of 0-100, from failure (zero) to average (50) to great (100). The totals were then averaged for each president and ranked from highest to lowest.A majority of the 170 respondents — roughly 57% — identified as Democrats. Just 13% were Republicans, while 27% said they were independents, and 3% selected other.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:37 pm

Just did, you **** idiot.

"Survivorship bias"

**** douche.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:46 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:46 pm

                             
You still think it means dead presidents.

Vegas » 22 Nov 2022, 5:45 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:45 pm

I'll give you a hint, but it's going to require level 2+ thinking on your part. 

Ready?

Hint: Notice how the Republicans were chosen vs the dimocrats. 
And there, you shall find, your invisible subgroup.

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:20 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:20 pm

It's exactly because I do know that I know you are a **** moron.

Presidents don't drop out of the rankings because they die.

**** idiot.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 22 Nov 2022, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Nov 2022, 5:52 pm

You have no **** idea what you're talking about.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...