Huey » 04 Dec 2022, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ Run, PP, run. The more you use strike thru the more I repost until you acknowledge facts.
Never said they didn’t. For a few years you still went on and on about how great they were and their system was.
1. Sweden was not great. Same players and they couldn’t make the group round this year.
2. Suarez is not on the same level as Messi and Ronaldo.
Run, PP, run. The more you use strike thru the more I repost until you acknowledge facts.
Whatever argument you are, once again, having with yourself, godspeed.Huey » 04 Dec 2022, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ Run, PP, run. The more you use strike thru the more I repost until you acknowledge facts.
Never said they didn’t. For a few years you still went on and on about how great they were and their system was.
1. Sweden was not great. Same players and they couldn’t make the group round this year.
2. Suarez is not on the same level as Messi and Ronaldo.
Do you remember you small country argument where you got bitch slapped to the point you reframed to on of “frequency”? That was hilarious.
Oh wait, you can’t remember what you posted an hour ago.
Whatever argument you are having with yourself is a diversion from what was actually posted.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2022, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑ Whatever argument you are, once again, having with yourself, godspeed.
The facts.
2018, Elite 8
No, it isn't, lying little ****.Huey » 04 Dec 2022, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ Whatever argument you are having with yourself is a diversion from what was actually posted.
Run, PP, run. The more you use strike thru the more I repost until you acknowledge facts.
Never said they didn’t. For a few years you still went on and on about how great they were and their system was.
1. Sweden was not great. Same players and they couldn’t make the group round this year.
2. Suarez is not on the same level as Messi and Ronaldo.
Do you remember you small country argument where you got bitch slapped to the point you reframed to on of “frequency”? That was hilarious.
Oh wait, you can’t remember what you posted an hour ago.
Not here to answer questions.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2022, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ No, it isn't, lying little ****.
Were it so, you would have answered the first time...
But you didn't...
Whatever argument you are having with yourself is a diversion from what was actually posted.
Run, PP, run. The more you use strike thru the more I repost until you acknowledge facts.
Never said they didn’t. For a few years you still went on and on about how great they were and their system was.
1. Sweden was not great. Same players and they couldn’t make the group round this year.
2. Suarez is not on the same level as Messi and Ronaldo.
Do you remember you small country argument where you got bitch slapped to the point you reframed to on of “frequency”? That was hilarious.
Oh wait, you can’t remember what you posted an hour ago.
You're just here to run from the facts, yapping.
You ask questions about things I never denied. Basically the same no offense team did not make it to the final 32. Park the bus offenses will not win titles. It is like a present defense and remember what Madden said about those:
For the last time....Huey » 04 Dec 2022, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ You ask questions about things I never denied. Basically the same no offense team did not make it to the final 32. Park the bus offenses will not win titles. It is like a present defense and remember what Madden said about those:
"All a prevent defense does is prevent you from winning.”
The argument was initially about their park the bus offense.
No, it is not. I never said they didn’t. You are diverting.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2022, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ For the last time....
The point is to oblige you to stipulate to them.
You chose to exhume this debate and reframe it.
You ask questions about things I never denied. Basically the same no offense team did not make it to the final 32. Park the bus offenses will not win titles. It is like a present defense and remember what Madden said about those:
"All a prevent defense does is prevent you from winning.”
The argument was initially about their park the bus offense.
Resting comfortably on his laurels.
Shirley you mean "appearing"..Huey » 07 Dec 2022, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ At home. Not in Qatar.
Where Ronaldo is STILL playing. While I agree with his benching the coach tried to say it was tactical, not disciplinary.
If you were really paying attention to the games you would have posted how Ronaldo's replacement, Ramos, played. And you should have heard tens of thousands of fans chanting Ronaldo when he was going into the game. Didn't hear that for Suarez.
And remember, Suarez was benched because of his performance.
I don't care..Huey » 07 Dec 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all what I mean. If you had read my posts instead of lining it out you would KNOW exactly what I mean. Try again.
At home. Not in Qatar.
Where Ronaldo is STILL playing. While I agree with his benching the coach tried to say it was tactical, not disciplinary.
If you were really paying attention to the games you would have posted how Ronaldo's replacement, Ramos, played. And you should have heard tens of thousands of fans chanting Ronaldo when he was going into the game. Didn't hear that for Suarez.
And remember, Suarez was benched because of his performance.
Blackvegetable » 07 Dec 2022, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑I don't care..Huey » 07 Dec 2022, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ Not at all what I mean. If you had read my posts instead of lining it out you would KNOW exactly what I mean. Try again.
At home. Not in Qatar.
Where Ronaldo is STILL playing. While I agree with his benching the coach tried to say it was tactical, not disciplinary.
If you were really paying attention to the games you would have posted how Ronaldo's replacement, Ramos, played. And you should have heard tens of thousands of fans chanting Ronaldo when he was going into the game. Didn't hear that for Suarez.
And remember, Suarez was benched because of his performance.
Your posts are always 85-100% tantrum.
What specific argument do you believe you've won?Huey » 07 Dec 2022, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ I accept your surrender and your admission you don't know what you are talking. It would behoove you to never challenge me on this topic again.![]()